Sounds like an astroturf effort.

Wow. This blogger is absolutely crazy! I hope we don't have people this nasty -- and, hello, totally racist! -- in our school. We can have viewpoint diversity without condoning hateful people.

By over reacting to simple observations the Glasgow Group supporters become completely unhinged because they simply cannot handle the truth.

Google Glasgow Group + Social Media and read the detective they authored. Then watch the videos and come to your own conclusions as to whether they should be involved with your school. Then send a letter voicing your concerns.

Anonymous wrote:https://www.fairforall.org/the-glasgow-group/

Is this the same group? Is this what Undercover Mother is referring to? Are they in every school in DC? Do they just come and speak or are they working alongside staff and faculty?

I know nothing about this rambling undercover mother, but FAIR is a real and serious group. It’s board includes black professors at Columbia and Brown, a former NYTimes opinion editor, and other serious people as well as, yes, some more populist types but they are by no means as far as I can tell dominant. It views itself as a civil rights group on the spirit of MLK, and speaks out about some aspects of the modern progressive anti-racist Movement that seems willing to accept explicitly, race-based discrimination in the name of promoting diversity in violation of others civil rights (beyond current legal standards) based on overly simplistic notions of equity. My understanding is that FAIR supports policies that promote equality of opportunity, but rejects the notion that “disparate impact” is proof that a policy is necessarily racist. They call out the excesses of some DEI programming as adopted by public and private organizations (example, people being told they cannot do tasks because of their race, losing jobs if they refuse to participate in exercises where they must confess their innate racism, etc. - yes, these things exist and there are some litigations pending)

It has developed a school curriculum — which I have not studied myself - but I believe they tout it as both inclusive of the dark side of American History, but puts it in historical context and notes the progress of the American experiment over time. Similarly, they are developing some sort of model DEI trainings. FAIR is forming a DC (really DMV) chapter.

Anonymous wrote:Calling people “Trumpers” and insinuating they’re racists because they question the actions and motives is textbook
Saul Alinsky “Rules For Radicals” operations. Creating a controversy to divide a community is the stock and trade of propagandists who have little to offer except the manipulation of students by employing fake media posts.

What are you babbling about?

Anonymous wrote:Has anyone seen the posts by Undercover mother?

https://undercovermother.substack.com/p/exposed

These are standard talking points from Christopher Rufo and the astroturf groups paid to sow division.

Bottom line: You can choose to go to these schools or not. No one is forcing you to pay $50,000 a year for something you don't like.

Anonymous wrote:The Glasgow Group advocates for creating problems where none exist so that they may profit from the controversy.

Rodney Glasgow describes Sandy Springs as a plantation and the environment inside of area privates as being like Jan. 6th every day. Clearly he’s a narcissist who struggles with imposter syndrome and takes advantage of the very people he purports to help.

Wow! This is completely false. If you view him this way that says more about YOU and your handle on reality.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just can’t believe what a whack-a-MAGAMom this board has become. Just when you think you made these semi-articulate posters see some reason, another halfwit pops up with another thread.

The website OP shared is despicable, whatever your ideology. It’s also really, really dumb. [Laughs in disbelief]

FYI - deriding people as “MAGA” or “Trumpers” lost persuasive force quite a while ago. Try harder.

NP. Ok. “Dipshits”? “Dummies”? “Assholes”? “Racist trash”? “KKK-lite”? “Losers”? All of those fit.

You need to move beyond insults if you want people to listen. The left’s tactic of hurling insults has worn fairly thin at this point. People know the trick now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just can’t believe what a whack-a-MAGAMom this board has become. Just when you think you made these semi-articulate posters see some reason, another halfwit pops up with another thread.

The website OP shared is despicable, whatever your ideology. It’s also really, really dumb. [Laughs in disbelief]

FYI - deriding people as “MAGA” or “Trumpers” lost persuasive force quite a while ago. Try harder.

NP. Ok. “Dipshits”? “Dummies”? “Assholes”? “Racist trash”? “KKK-lite”? “Losers”? All of those fit.

Anonymous wrote:The Glasgow Group advocates for creating problems where none exist so that they may profit from the controversy.

Rodney Glasgow describes Sandy Springs as a plantation and the environment inside of area privates as being like Jan. 6th every day. Clearly he’s a narcissist who struggles with imposter syndrome and takes advantage of the very people he purports to help.

+1000

The Glasgow Group advocates for creating problems where none exist so that they may profit from the controversy.

Rodney Glasgow describes Sandy Springs as a plantation and the environment inside of area privates as being like Jan. 6th every day. Clearly he’s a narcissist who struggles with imposter syndrome and takes advantage of the very people he purports to help.

Don’t know because I’m not ideologue or conspiracist. But I can tell a populist demagoguery when I see it

Not just by jargon but also by how poorly argued it is

I don’t agree with everything I hear in school either but both our DCs and I can tell when something’s just a lazy jargon soup on any side and moreover can process it (or ignore) with dignity and maturity

Also though can see there are children who really do need better opportunities and more support as it takes a village

What we don’t need: more drunktard quazi-arguments

Calling people “Trumpers” and insinuating they’re racists because they question the actions and motives is textbook
Saul Alinsky “Rules For Radicals” operations. Creating a controversy to divide a community is the stock and trade of propagandists who have little to offer except the manipulation of students by employing fake media posts.

Guess what? I don’t need to do anything.

If anyone needs to try harder, it’s you, MAGAMom. But I don’t think you have the capacity or grace

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just can’t believe what a whack-a-MAGAMom this board has become. Just when you think you made these semi-articulate posters see some reason, another halfwit pops up with another thread.

The website OP shared is despicable, whatever your ideology. It’s also really, really dumb. [Laughs in disbelief]

FYI - deriding people as “MAGA” or “Trumpers” lost persuasive force quite a while ago. Try harder.

Nah. It’s still fitting. Trumper.