Anonymous wrote:OMG you people and your H-B
it’s a stupid program whose outcomes are no more impressive then any other public high school in the nova area. Change it over to a regular high school and drop the middle school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think 4th high school should focus on arts and be in offcebuilding in Rosslyn. No sports so don’t need fields. With telework in future for gov will be empty space. Even use old FDIC space
Arts??? For these programs to address capacity, they need to be able to attract students. ATech has failed to do that; HB does that it droves. Maybe a 2nd HBW would be worthwhile, but considering how nice The Heights building is, any 2nd HBW will be a second class program.
Anonymous wrote:I’ve met 2 ATS legacy then HB grads and they are just ordinary. Not impressed. I am concerned about WL and WK being 4000 kids each. Shifts abs distance learning? Can’t APS do better or is this part of the downfall of APS.
Anonymous wrote:I think 4th high school should focus on arts and be in offcebuilding in Rosslyn. No sports so don’t need fields. With telework in future for gov will be empty space. Even use old FDIC space
Anonymous wrote:I think 4th high school should focus on arts and be in offcebuilding in Rosslyn. No sports so don’t need fields. With telework in future for gov will be empty space. Even use old FDIC space
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course the $100M building has no plan for additional capacity. What a crock. Is every HB class max size? Every room utilized? Could they move Stratford somewhere else and rephrase that space?
Umm, this was very clearly and publicly planned and presented. No surprises. And the space on the bottom level was designed for Shriver program students specifically. They had to be relocated temporarily and there was a large uproar at the time. I’m sorry you are late to the party.
And HB fought hard NOT to move. That wasn't something they wanted.
FFS, they wanted to keep the largest footprint campus in North Arlington. Of course they didn’t want to more. But they are prima donna about not making the program larger; if they had communicated a willingness to help the community and plan for growth that would have fed back into the plans for the building.
They would gladly support more students - in a second, separate HB program.
Anonymous wrote:All this talk about HB is like suggesting we put a bigger bandaid on this bleeding artery. Way to focus on the problem at hand.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't get why HBW has to stay 6-12 grade. We have more middle school capacity now that we've opened Hamm. Last I checked, Hamm and Williamsburg were under-enrolled, even pre-pandemic. If APS sent the HBW middle school kids back to their home schools and made HBW 9-12 instead, it would also give more kids a chance to rotate through the program because students would only stay for 4 years instead of 7 years. I've never understood why middle school has to be part of the HBW program.
That is a great idea. And with high student teacher ratios in classroom that also can increase the size of the program.
They could keep HBW MS program as a program tract within the middle schools or even just the one do the middle schools in HB MS — it would fill easily, just don’t guarantee admittance the HBW HS because of the size mismatch. That seems much more equitable rather than basically have those who apply in 6th get the special treatment for 7 years rather than potentially more participating for 3 or 4 years.
Bravo.
Anonymous wrote:I don't get why HBW has to stay 6-12 grade. We have more middle school capacity now that we've opened Hamm. Last I checked, Hamm and Williamsburg were under-enrolled, even pre-pandemic. If APS sent the HBW middle school kids back to their home schools and made HBW 9-12 instead, it would also give more kids a chance to rotate through the program because students would only stay for 4 years instead of 7 years. I've never understood why middle school has to be part of the HBW program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Of course the $100M building has no plan for additional capacity. What a crock. Is every HB class max size? Every room utilized? Could they move Stratford somewhere else and rephrase that space?
Umm, this was very clearly and publicly planned and presented. No surprises. And the space on the bottom level was designed for Shriver program students specifically. They had to be relocated temporarily and there was a large uproar at the time. I’m sorry you are late to the party.
And HB fought hard NOT to move. That wasn't something they wanted.
FFS, they wanted to keep the largest footprint campus in North Arlington. Of course they didn’t want to more. But they are prima donna about not making the program larger; if they had communicated a willingness to help the community and plan for growth that would have fed back into the plans for the building.