Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you spend just $500 per month on groceries, that's $1500 per year. Maybe that's nothing to you, but that's meaningful for many people. OP: you must be quite privileged.
=500*12 =6000 yearly 2.5% is $150 dollars.....
Anonymous wrote:If you spend just $500 per month on groceries, that's $1500 per year. Maybe that's nothing to you, but that's meaningful for many people. OP: you must be quite privileged.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The issue isn't the grocery tax itself so much as how they will make up for the lost revenue, much of which goes to localities. This is just like Gilmore's attempt to repeal the car tax. The legislation he got passed would have phased it out over five years, but midway through the phase out the legislature froze it because they couldn't cover the shortfall to the general fund. The end result is that we still have a car tax with only limited relief, but Richmond has a whole set of new obligations to transfer funding to localities to make up for the loss of revenue. The grocery tax would be no different unless Youngkin comes up with a proposal for raising other taxes to make up the lost revenue.
Or spend less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The grocery tax is ridiculous. That said, how is Youngkin going to replace the revenue? Is his plan the 80s style trickle down economics? Virginia is already a top state for businesses. Youngkin will probably make it less attractive since he wants extreme right wing policies here.
DC doesn’t have a grocery tax. We’re doing fine - universal pre-k, full paid leave, UBI pilot for new moms, and free Covid tests to all residents. But I suppose we’re too right wing for you?
Your state governor sounds great -- oh wait -- these are handouts to the fiefdom from the rest of the country.
Yeah - and we pay federal tax and have no representation in Congress. Go back to 11th grade government class.
Anonymous wrote:The issue isn't the grocery tax itself so much as how they will make up for the lost revenue, much of which goes to localities. This is just like Gilmore's attempt to repeal the car tax. The legislation he got passed would have phased it out over five years, but midway through the phase out the legislature froze it because they couldn't cover the shortfall to the general fund. The end result is that we still have a car tax with only limited relief, but Richmond has a whole set of new obligations to transfer funding to localities to make up for the loss of revenue. The grocery tax would be no different unless Youngkin comes up with a proposal for raising other taxes to make up the lost revenue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you spend just $500 per month on groceries, that's $1500 per year. Maybe that's nothing to you, but that's meaningful for many people. OP: you must be quite privileged.
HAHAHAHA! Check your numbers again.
This definitely shows the intelligence level of Youngkin supporters.
Anonymous wrote:groceries sales tax is only 2.5% so you won't even noticed it after its repealed by Youngkin, you will only noticed it if you're poor and pay in cash or if you look at the bill, If you spend $100 dollars on groceries it will only save you $2.50.... If they want to repeal a tax they should start with the SALES TAX AND THE RESTATE TAX AND the INCOME TAX. Just removing the Groceries tax is bs....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The grocery tax is ridiculous. That said, how is Youngkin going to replace the revenue? Is his plan the 80s style trickle down economics? Virginia is already a top state for businesses. Youngkin will probably make it less attractive since he wants extreme right wing policies here.
DC doesn’t have a grocery tax. We’re doing fine - universal pre-k, full paid leave, UBI pilot for new moms, and free Covid tests to all residents. But I suppose we’re too right wing for you?
Your state governor sounds great -- oh wait -- these are handouts to the fiefdom from the rest of the country.
Anonymous wrote:If you spend just $500 per month on groceries, that's $1500 per year. Maybe that's nothing to you, but that's meaningful for many people. OP: you must be quite privileged.
Anonymous wrote:Most states don’t impose a sales tax on regular groceries.
Anonymous wrote:The grocery tax is ridiculous. That said, how is Youngkin going to replace the revenue? Is his plan the 80s style trickle down economics? Virginia is already a top state for businesses. Youngkin will probably make it less attractive since he wants extreme right wing policies here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you spend just $500 per month on groceries, that's $1500 per year. Maybe that's nothing to you, but that's meaningful for many people. OP: you must be quite privileged.
It is $150 a year. Not $1,500.
Do you also want our schools to teach about the debates between Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass?