Anonymous
01/16/2022 08:54
Subject: Re:Dreading Youngkin
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
No, Youngkin says it's the parents' choice, regardless of what the individual school districts or schools say.
From his Executive Order:
The parents of any child enrolled in a elementary or secondary school or a school based
early childcare and educational program may elect for their children not to be subject
to any mask mandate in effect at the child’s school or educational program.
No parent electing that a mask mandate should not apply to his or her child shall be
required to provide a reason or make any certification concerning their child’s health
or education.
A child whose parent has elected that he or she is not subject to a mask mandate should
not be required to wear a mask under any policy implemented by a teacher, school,
school district, the Department of Education, or any other state authority.
+1. Governor Trump is trying to strip localities’ ability to make their own decisions on this based on local conditions, and instead put all control in Richmond’s hands. Classic Republican big government.
Don’t blame it on Richmond, please. We don’t want him.
Anonymous
01/16/2022 07:44
Subject: Re:Dreading Youngkin
Anonymous wrote:
No, Youngkin says it's the parents' choice, regardless of what the individual school districts or schools say.
From his Executive Order:
The parents of any child enrolled in a elementary or secondary school or a school based
early childcare and educational program may elect for their children not to be subject
to any mask mandate in effect at the child’s school or educational program.
No parent electing that a mask mandate should not apply to his or her child shall be
required to provide a reason or make any certification concerning their child’s health
or education.
A child whose parent has elected that he or she is not subject to a mask mandate should
not be required to wear a mask under any policy implemented by a teacher, school,
school district, the Department of Education, or any other state authority.
+1. Governor Trump is trying to strip localities’ ability to make their own decisions on this based on local conditions, and instead put all control in Richmond’s hands. Classic Republican big government.
Anonymous
01/15/2022 23:59
Subject: Re:Dreading Youngkin
Anonymous wrote:
Nope, he said it was a local decision on the campaign trail but has already pulled a bait-and-switch on day one. The EO explicitly states no school or jurisdiction may require masks. So much for local authority.
Kids won’t be allowed on the bus or in the school. Think Youngkin is going to send state troopers out to every elementary school on the first few weeks in his job?
Anonymous
01/15/2022 23:16
Subject: Dreading Youngkin
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:He looks like a cheesy father of the bride from the 90s in his ridiculous inauguration outfit.
You must be completely clueless re Virginia gubernatorial inaugurations. The governor always wears that outfit, whomever is bring inaugurated.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/virginiadem.wordpress.com/2014/01/11/mcauliffe-northam-herring-inauguration-day/amp/
Ew, why?
Anonymous
01/15/2022 23:11
Subject: Re:Dreading Youngkin
Nope, he said it was a local decision on the campaign trail but has already pulled a bait-and-switch on day one. The EO explicitly states no school or jurisdiction may require masks. So much for local authority.
Anonymous
01/15/2022 22:23
Subject: Re:Dreading Youngkin
No, Youngkin says it's the parents' choice, regardless of what the individual school districts or schools say.
From his Executive Order:
The parents of any child enrolled in a elementary or secondary school or a school based
early childcare and educational program may elect for their children not to be subject
to any mask mandate in effect at the child’s school or educational program.
No parent electing that a mask mandate should not apply to his or her child shall be
required to provide a reason or make any certification concerning their child’s health
or education.
A child whose parent has elected that he or she is not subject to a mask mandate should
not be required to wear a mask under any policy implemented by a teacher, school,
school district, the Department of Education, or any other state authority.
Anonymous
01/15/2022 22:19
Subject: Dreading Youngkin
Anonymous wrote:He looks like a cheesy father of the bride from the 90s in his ridiculous inauguration outfit.
You must be completely clueless re Virginia gubernatorial inaugurations. The governor always wears that outfit, whomever is bring inaugurated.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/virginiadem.wordpress.com/2014/01/11/mcauliffe-northam-herring-inauguration-day/amp/
Anonymous
01/15/2022 22:17
Subject: Re:Dreading Youngkin
It’s hard to imagine how Yohngkin could have been more divisive on his first day in office, short of burning a cross on the front lawn of the governors mansion.
Anonymous
Anonymous
01/15/2022 21:53
Subject: Dreading Youngkin
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Move to DC!
If things get bad enough, we will move to Maryland. No need to stay in a shithole when they’re sanity just a few miles away.
Come join us in MoCo. It’s not perfect but we will never allow in a Trumpkin.
Anonymous
01/15/2022 21:15
Subject: Dreading Youngkin
Anonymous wrote:He looks like a cheesy father of the bride from the 90s in his ridiculous inauguration outfit.
He had a Pillsbury doughboy face going on, which makes it hard to pull off a polished look.
Anonymous
01/15/2022 21:14
Subject: Dreading Youngkin
Anonymous wrote:Move to DC!
If things get bad enough, we will move to Maryland. No need to stay in a shithole when they’re sanity just a few miles away.
Anonymous
01/15/2022 21:12
Subject: Dreading Youngkin
He looks like a cheesy father of the bride from the 90s in his ridiculous inauguration outfit.
Anonymous
01/15/2022 21:10
Subject: Dreading Youngkin
Move to DC!