Anonymous wrote:No. You assumed the risk by sending your kid. Sorry. Is this purely hypothetical?
A hypothetical example. Let's say this is the last coronavirus wave and it's mild. MCPS will look like they're superstars.
Let's say, however, this is not the last coronavirus wave and the next one is not mild. However, MCPS went back on their own policies, or maybe MCPS finds out that kids lungs get damaged and a next wave is far more serious (even if they were vaccinated) and the family can prove the in-person child was first infected? That would put MCPS, hypothetically, squarely as the proximate cause of their injuries? Adding that MCPS *COULD* have offered hybrid options, but did not; *COULD* have published daily data, but stopped; MCPS employees and board leadership *COULD* be linked to some of the comments on this anonymous board as part of criminal discovery; yada, yada, yada, it may not be beyond the realm of possibility?
Is it a long-shot, sure. But only after history is played out will anyone really have 20/20 hindsight. A jury could, hypothetically, see the timing of not posting daily updates combined with a end of week policy change this week as knowingly and deliberately intending to commit an act of wanton negligence?