Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have been a person on here who regularly comments that teachers are making plenty at 100k a year.
Even I think sub pay is too low.
That’s the end of the pay scale WTF. 100k in DC is nothing. But I agree subs need more money.
I understand that you struggle to get by on your salary of 300k per year, but the median household income in DC is $92,266 so you are objectively wrong.
Teachers deserve more than median wage.
And 300k would be fine. Kidding I’m thinking more 150k.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have been a person on here who regularly comments that teachers are making plenty at 100k a year.
Even I think sub pay is too low.
That’s the end of the pay scale WTF. 100k in DC is nothing. But I agree subs need more money.
I understand that you struggle to get by on your salary of 300k per year, but the median household income in DC is $92,266 so you are objectively wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have been a person on here who regularly comments that teachers are making plenty at 100k a year.
Even I think sub pay is too low.
That’s the end of the pay scale WTF. 100k in DC is nothing. But I agree subs need more money.
Anonymous wrote:I have been a person on here who regularly comments that teachers are making plenty at 100k a year.
Even I think sub pay is too low.
Anonymous wrote:How about they pay full-time teachers who sign a year-long contract, no more than 10 days of in-person absence etc, $5,500+ a month and call it day?
Why pay subs (DCPS retirees) $9,000/mo? Get teachers for a year instead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s retired teachers only, it doesn’t have anything to do with certification. I’m a certified DCPS teacher that substitutes, I have young children that my parents want to watch and like the flexibility to only work on those days. I am not eligible for the increased rate. Also, even if a substitute teacher works every school day there are not benefits available. So unless you get health insurance somewhere else you’re out of luck. There aren’t enough substitutes because no one who doesn’t have money and benefits coming from somewhere else can afford to do it.
They're retired...why would they need benefits? Anyone over 65 qualifies for free healthcare via medicare? They don't need a retirement account because they're already retired. Sick leave...they can just not sign up to sub that day.
Anonymous wrote:Man I pay a college babysitter more than a sub makes. I'm not rich, just a fed making under $90K before taxes. Pretty sure subbing a public school class of 30 kids is harder than playing with my 4 yo and 2 yo.
Anonymous wrote:How about they pay full-time teachers who sign a year-long contract, no more than 10 days of in-person absence etc, $5,500+ a month and call it day?
Why pay subs (DCPS retirees) $9,000/mo? Get teachers for a year instead.