Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't have a dog in this fight (punintentional) but I am not seeing how Blake Lane makes geographic sense as an ES given the proximity to Mosaic ES and Oakton ES. The Dunn Loring site seems like it will be able to ease capacity pressure at BOTH Mosaic AND the various schools in greater Tysons area / FC outskirts. It's the frustration just because it's going to take longer to achieve the relief this way? Because long-term it seems the obviously superior choice.
Dunn Loring ES will be almost 6 miles from Mosaic ES. It won’t do anything to ease future capacity pressure there.
Maybe you’re confusing Mosaic ES with the Mosaic District, which feeds to Fairhill ES in a different pyramid.
Anonymous wrote:It’s appears that Karl Frish’s priorities during his time as a School Board member have been to push the sexual ideology indoctrination of students in FCPS and to preserve the dog park in his area. Both causes serve his personal interests, as opposed to those of the majority of the community members he represents. Enough of these activists making self-serving decisions that affect all children and are financed by tax payers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our K at Marshall road started at 24 and had 30 by Christmas. It was waaaay too big to control.
Yikes. That sounds chaotic.
But class sizes and whether schools are above or below capacity are different issues. If you have a small school with 60 kids in K or 1st grade, and it’s not a Title I school, you run the risk that you’ll end up with two classes each with 30 kids, even if the total number of kids leaves the school enrollment at 60-70% of building capacity.
Anonymous wrote:Our K at Marshall road started at 24 and had 30 by Christmas. It was waaaay too big to control.
Anonymous wrote:I don't have a dog in this fight (punintentional) but I am not seeing how Blake Lane makes geographic sense as an ES given the proximity to Mosaic ES and Oakton ES. The Dunn Loring site seems like it will be able to ease capacity pressure at BOTH Mosaic AND the various schools in greater Tysons area / FC outskirts. It's the frustration just because it's going to take longer to achieve the relief this way? Because long-term it seems the obviously superior choice.
Anonymous wrote:I don't have a dog in this fight (punintentional) but I am not seeing how Blake Lane makes geographic sense as an ES given the proximity to Mosaic ES and Oakton ES. The Dunn Loring site seems like it will be able to ease capacity pressure at BOTH Mosaic AND the various schools in greater Tysons area / FC outskirts. It's the frustration just because it's going to take longer to achieve the relief this way? Because long-term it seems the obviously superior choice.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Karl Frisch+the pandemic really screwed Shrevewood over. Three years ago, we were promised a boundary study the following fall, which was then postponed to the next fall, and then of course the pandemic happened so that was postponed again, and somehow Karl managed to slide in the Dunn Loring proposal under the radar.
How are things at Shrevewood? Did the pandemic help with the capacity issues?
I don't know about other grades, but Kindergarten classes are huge (larger than normal, according to neighbors with older kids). I really hope they hire a new teacher for first grade because those classes are only going to get bigger. I had heard that a few home schoolers were going to start their Kindergarteners in January, but I imagine that they have postponed their plans due to Omicron.
Anonymous wrote:Hard to believe any of these comments are anything other than astroturfing. Repurposing Dunn Loring makes much more sense than building a brand new school outright. Why anyone thinks any of this has to do with a DOG PARK only makes sense when you understand that 90% of the criticism about Frisch is very thinly veiled anti-gay stuff. That he cares more about phis than children. That he has no children in the schools.
Look, I’d having a vested interest in the schools and expertise in public education was a requirement for being elected to the school board, we’d be electing experienced FCPS teachers who are also FCPS parents. But that is explicitly Not allowed. So let’s let go of the criticism that Frisch has no children. He is a member of our community.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Karl Frisch+the pandemic really screwed Shrevewood over. Three years ago, we were promised a boundary study the following fall, which was then postponed to the next fall, and then of course the pandemic happened so that was postponed again, and somehow Karl managed to slide in the Dunn Loring proposal under the radar.
How are things at Shrevewood? Did the pandemic help with the capacity issues?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doubt it’s going to sync up well with the whole “you can live, work, and play in Tysons” marketing pitch if they end up telling people with kids moving into some of the hundreds of new Tysons condos that their kids can schlep to some school in Dunn Loring, which is between Vienna and Merrifield.
It really isn’t that far. What is it a mile or 2. We bus kids halfway across the county from Herndon to Great Falls/Langley. And yes I do believe families will eventually be drawn to the condos in Tysons. It is how much of the world lives. Small spaces that is.