Anonymous wrote:This is false. Business calculus does not require trigonometry, which AP/engineering calculus do. That's why even MIT accepts AP calc credit.Anonymous wrote:Business calculus and engineering calculus are very different. The calculus it take in high school is business calculus.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes calc II and III, physics I, II, III. Also statics and dynamics. This was at UMD more than 10 years ago.
And these are vastly harder than AP Calc BC and AP Physics C? Do these classes prepare you at all?
Somewhat. My son has always been getting easy As in high school math, went beyond AP calc to multivariable calculus and differential equations, never been tutored, etc.
And then he took Calc II-III as a math major in one of the top schools. It was brutal. Half of the math majors switched to something else, like economics, as a result. I'd imagine the same thing is happening with Engineering majors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They allow you to skip them, which is awesome. You can do just fine in calc 3 with a BC background so long as you learned the material properly. Taking calc 1 and 2 from a weeder program doesn't teach you the material better, it just gives you a lower GPA.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes calc II and III, physics I, II, III. Also statics and dynamics. This was at UMD more than 10 years ago.
And these are vastly harder than AP Calc BC and AP Physics C? Do these classes prepare you at all?
You are responding for a four year old post.
Anonymous wrote:For my child at Northwestern, it was Physics in the Integrated Science Program. My child took Calculus BC and Physics C in high school, and the ISP Physics course she took fall quarter completely kicked her a$$. One of my majors was physics, and I was astounded at the level and depth of questions in both the course and on the exams
This is false. Business calculus does not require trigonometry, which AP/engineering calculus do. That's why even MIT accepts AP calc credit.Anonymous wrote:Business calculus and engineering calculus are very different. The calculus it take in high school is business calculus.

Anonymous wrote:They allow you to skip them, which is awesome. You can do just fine in calc 3 with a BC background so long as you learned the material properly. Taking calc 1 and 2 from a weeder program doesn't teach you the material better, it just gives you a lower GPA.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes calc II and III, physics I, II, III. Also statics and dynamics. This was at UMD more than 10 years ago.
And these are vastly harder than AP Calc BC and AP Physics C? Do these classes prepare you at all?
They allow you to skip them, which is awesome. You can do just fine in calc 3 with a BC background so long as you learned the material properly. Taking calc 1 and 2 from a weeder program doesn't teach you the material better, it just gives you a lower GPA.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes calc II and III, physics I, II, III. Also statics and dynamics. This was at UMD more than 10 years ago.
And these are vastly harder than AP Calc BC and AP Physics C? Do these classes prepare you at all?
Anonymous wrote:Would life be less terrifying if you got a BA in CS and is a BA in CS less marketable than a BS in CS?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don’t freak out if your kid got a 50% on a physics or calc test, chances are there will be a curve and 50 —> 80.
Why would you know your kid's test scores? Land the helicopter.
Back in the day I had the top score on an exam in quantum physics with a 34%, which got me an A. Curves are real.
Because they call you crying because it’s the first time they’ve gotten anything below and 90. Most kids don’t even know what a curve is. They also don’t know you can drop a class at a certain date and it doesn’t show up on your transcript.