Anonymous wrote:A lot of postings over the last few weeks on the 2nd grade AAP pool made me realize that many on this board don't actually know what "equity" means. It is NOT equal treatment for all. It is "right sizing" the treatment based on the needs of the population.(alt+p)
Equity means providing the Title I kids more benefits than the kids from the higher SES schools because the Title I kids theoretically need greater support to have an equal footing as the kids from the SES schools.
Anonymous wrote:And none of the solutions are fair to the people that paid to watch the game. Removing the "barrier" to accommodate a cheater is not "justice"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pp please go private if you like, but lobby for a voucher system so the money follows the student. Then the people that stay in the public school can play their equity games from morning till night.
Equity is always more fair when it’s not done on your dime. It feels even good to be magnanimous with the less fortunate as long as it doesn’t hurt your pocket.
For the equity crowd, what have you personally done with your own resources to advance equity? Chances are the answer is nothing.
True! PP whose kid with 140+ score is in pool supports Equity as she has nothing to lose. When she has something to lose, she will Not support it.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of postings over the last few weeks on the 2nd grade AAP pool made me realize that many on this board don't actually know what "equity" means. It is NOT equal treatment for all. It is "right sizing" the treatment based on the needs of the population.(alt+p)
Equity means providing the Title I kids more benefits than the kids from the higher SES schools because the Title I kids theoretically need greater support to have an equal footing as the kids from the SES schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of postings over the last few weeks on the 2nd grade AAP pool made me realize that many on this board don't actually know what "equity" means. It is NOT equal treatment for all. It is "right sizing" the treatment based on the needs of the population.(alt+p)
Equity means providing the Title I kids more benefits than the kids from the higher SES schools because the Title I kids theoretically need greater support to have an equal footing as the kids from the SES schools.
So the high achiever receives nothing in order to give more to the lowest achiever? Seems like the direction FCPS is heading in.
The high achiever gets no boost in this example because they don't need it. They can already see the game without help. In other words, the high-SES child with a score of 132 is already surrounded by many other high-scoring kids (see FCPS example from prior years of schools with 40+ kids in-pool) and is likely receiving a higher level of educational services already as a result--for example, the elementary schools that are already using an AAP curriculum for gen ed.
Do you actually have any real world classroom experience? These make believe schools where everybody is 132+ don't exist and definitely don't exist when you take the 140 crowd to hang with 115/120s from elsewhere. HIgh SES schools also have problems, and yes also have many kids behind grade level, especially this year. Who do you think gets reading/math support on a 1 on 1 basis? Extra help multiple times a week? And who gets told to figure it out on their own with a small group of peers, teacher too busy to help.
Anonymous wrote:People are arguing based on speculation. There is no evidence at this point that FCPS will admit any fewer high-SES kids under the new system. Those not in the pool will self-refer anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of postings over the last few weeks on the 2nd grade AAP pool made me realize that many on this board don't actually know what "equity" means. It is NOT equal treatment for all. It is "right sizing" the treatment based on the needs of the population.(alt+p)
Equity means providing the Title I kids more benefits than the kids from the higher SES schools because the Title I kids theoretically need greater support to have an equal footing as the kids from the SES schools.
So the high achiever receives nothing in order to give more to the lowest achiever? Seems like the direction FCPS is heading in.
The high achiever gets no boost in this example because they don't need it. They can already see the game without help. In other words, the high-SES child with a score of 132 is already surrounded by many other high-scoring kids (see FCPS example from prior years of schools with 40+ kids in-pool) and is likely receiving a higher level of educational services already as a result--for example, the elementary schools that are already using an AAP curriculum for gen ed.
Anonymous wrote:Pp please go private if you like, but lobby for a voucher system so the money follows the student. Then the people that stay in the public school can play their equity games from morning till night.
Equity is always more fair when it’s not done on your dime. It feels even good to be magnanimous with the less fortunate as long as it doesn’t hurt your pocket.
For the equity crowd, what have you personally done with your own resources to advance equity? Chances are the answer is nothing.