Anonymous wrote:If your daughter prefers Sarah, you and DH should call her Sarah. If your daughter is a people pleaser, maybe the pet name annoys her when YOU use it, but she's pretending it doesn't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah the fact that she escalated after you pointed it out means she knows absolutely that this is getting a rise out of you and is enjoying it.
Depending on the age of the kid either I would say or tell my child she could (but doesn’t have to) say that she prefers grandma call her “Sarah”. If she’s otherwise a good MIL I’d privately tell her, hey, Sarah mentioned to me she feels uncomfortable with you using her parents name for her, but you know how she is she’s never going to tell you that she loves you to bits. If she continues using it after that, tells you how much she cares about boundaries...
So, you'd lie to Grandma and say your child said something you didn't, and then it would teach you what the other person thinks about boundaries?
Sarah didn't mention that she felt uncomfortable. She got put on a spot by a parent who admits that they're visibly annoyed when it happens and bent over backwards to find a response that didn't offend anyone. The kid is so scared of mom's reaction that she freezes and looks to her when this happens. This is a parent with huge problems with boundaries. Grandma isn't the issue.
I disagree. I think her response that it is a name only for Mommy and Daddy to use suggests she’s not comfortable with Grandma using it. Grandparents are not parents, and a reasonable boundary is to not use the same name a parent does. If MiL won’t accept a reasonable request to use the same name for the child she has been using all along, then she is out of line.
My husband calls me an affectionate name in public. That doesn’t mean my father in law is welcome to.
My issue with this approach is that it shifts accountability. OP is the one with the issue. Or, at least, we KNOW OP has an issue and the child may have an issue. It is wrong to make this about the child. We shouldn't use our kids that way. OP needs to speak for herself, relying on her own emotions and desires, if she feels the need to say anything at all.
OP is the child’s mother. I think she can say better than we can if her daughter is actually ok with this.
Anonymous wrote:If you don’t want other people to use a pet name, then don’t use it in earshot of other people.
Anonymous wrote:MIL recently started calling my kid by the pet name that only I and DH use. It grates on me when she says it. Kid thinks it's weird but tends to bend over backwards for people and when I asked if she cared just said, "well it's really for you and daddy at home, but I guess it's okay."
When MIL has used the name, I at first was surprised and let it go, but after seeing my kid make a face, I tried correcting and saying "Schmoopy? Oh, you mean Sarah?" which I realize is a little passive aggressive. Next time I said, "sorry, it's funny to hear you use that name, it's really just a nickname DH and I use." After that she seemed to do it even more!
I wish I could be more laid back, but it feels like nails on a chalkboard. Advice?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yea, I have advice for you -- chill out.
Nope, her kid is uncomfortable because grandma is trying to co-opt a level of intimacy she does not have. OP said this is a pet name, not simply a nickname.
You're conveniently skipping over the fact that OP said her daughter is a people pleaser, she was likely equally reacting to OP's reaction. IT sounds like OP is creating a stressful situation for her daughter and she has learned to bend over backward to keep mommy calm and happy. OP needs to relax big time.
If and only if it really bothers her daughter then she can coach her daughter to say " Grandma, I like it better when you call me X".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah the fact that she escalated after you pointed it out means she knows absolutely that this is getting a rise out of you and is enjoying it.
Depending on the age of the kid either I would say or tell my child she could (but doesn’t have to) say that she prefers grandma call her “Sarah”. If she’s otherwise a good MIL I’d privately tell her, hey, Sarah mentioned to me she feels uncomfortable with you using her parents name for her, but you know how she is she’s never going to tell you that she loves you to bits. If she continues using it after that, tells you how much she cares about boundaries...
So, you'd lie to Grandma and say your child said something you didn't, and then it would teach you what the other person thinks about boundaries?
Sarah didn't mention that she felt uncomfortable. She got put on a spot by a parent who admits that they're visibly annoyed when it happens and bent over backwards to find a response that didn't offend anyone. The kid is so scared of mom's reaction that she freezes and looks to her when this happens. This is a parent with huge problems with boundaries. Grandma isn't the issue.
I disagree. I think her response that it is a name only for Mommy and Daddy to use suggests she’s not comfortable with Grandma using it. Grandparents are not parents, and a reasonable boundary is to not use the same name a parent does. If MiL won’t accept a reasonable request to use the same name for the child she has been using all along, then she is out of line.
My husband calls me an affectionate name in public. That doesn’t mean my father in law is welcome to.
My issue with this approach is that it shifts accountability. OP is the one with the issue. Or, at least, we KNOW OP has an issue and the child may have an issue. It is wrong to make this about the child. We shouldn't use our kids that way. OP needs to speak for herself, relying on her own emotions and desires, if she feels the need to say anything at all.
OP is the child’s mother. I think she can say better than we can if her daughter is actually ok with this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah the fact that she escalated after you pointed it out means she knows absolutely that this is getting a rise out of you and is enjoying it.
Depending on the age of the kid either I would say or tell my child she could (but doesn’t have to) say that she prefers grandma call her “Sarah”. If she’s otherwise a good MIL I’d privately tell her, hey, Sarah mentioned to me she feels uncomfortable with you using her parents name for her, but you know how she is she’s never going to tell you that she loves you to bits. If she continues using it after that, tells you how much she cares about boundaries...
So, you'd lie to Grandma and say your child said something you didn't, and then it would teach you what the other person thinks about boundaries?
Sarah didn't mention that she felt uncomfortable. She got put on a spot by a parent who admits that they're visibly annoyed when it happens and bent over backwards to find a response that didn't offend anyone. The kid is so scared of mom's reaction that she freezes and looks to her when this happens. This is a parent with huge problems with boundaries. Grandma isn't the issue.
I disagree. I think her response that it is a name only for Mommy and Daddy to use suggests she’s not comfortable with Grandma using it. Grandparents are not parents, and a reasonable boundary is to not use the same name a parent does. If MiL won’t accept a reasonable request to use the same name for the child she has been using all along, then she is out of line.
My husband calls me an affectionate name in public. That doesn’t mean my father in law is welcome to.
My issue with this approach is that it shifts accountability. OP is the one with the issue. Or, at least, we KNOW OP has an issue and the child may have an issue. It is wrong to make this about the child. We shouldn't use our kids that way. OP needs to speak for herself, relying on her own emotions and desires, if she feels the need to say anything at all.