Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say that it is harder to stand out at a magnet program. I don’t think it gives you an advantage quite honestly. Lots of great reasons to attend a magnet program but college admissions isn’t one of them.
What seems to matter for elite institutions is having some kind of hook - high level athletics, music or national awards in science or CS competitions etc.
you can look at prior years magnet destinations to see how many kids end up at mit or cal tech or CMU. It is highly variable from year to year and it is not clear to me that magnet programs have an edge over a regular high school with a good science program
Where can I find prior years college destinations from the magnet programs? Is it in a separate thread on this forum?
I do not believe they officially release that info. The year my kid graduated, within my kid's close friends of a dozen or so, 1 to P, 2 to MIT, 1 Brown, a few to Cornell, 1 to Yale, and a few to UMD w/ merit. I don't remember anyone to H or Caltech but again this is only about dozen kids or so. I know it's just a data point, nothing more.
My DD and DS graduated from Blair in 2018 and 2016, and have a freshman currently at Blair. DD is a top Ivy doing economics and applied math, DS in Ivy doing finance. I would say that approx 20-30 from the magnet class for both kids went to top schools. and about a half went to UMD (many got great scholarship money). In order to stand out at Blair, agree with OP, high GPA, near perfect SAT/ACT, AP's with 4 and 5's, some leadership in school clubs (though does not matter much), national level awards whether it is USACO, USAMO, USAPhO, quiz bowls and many others. Individual awards are considered more prestigious than team awards for obvious reasons. If kid in research, then Science fair awards going to ISEF and conference presentations/ peer reviewed publications. Service/ volunteering is also big for top schools. I remember my DC was asked in interviews about what they did, as they also included anecdotes about volunteering in essays. All in all, it is certainly more difficult to stand out at Blair as many kids have top academic grades. You have to stand out in many more extracurriculars to be clearly noticed.
This is spot on. High stats are necessary but not sufficient. You also need top notch extracurricular accomplishments- national awards etc. to get into a top 20 school.
Seems right. But this is the rule everywhere, it may feel like the direct competition is other Blair students, but really it's that there are many other Blairs out there, and many other talented students who aren't at magnets. Being at a magnet isn't necessary. Personal accomplishment will trump magnet coursework, too.
I agree with the first sentence of the bolded and disagree with the second. Can't we all just agree that admissions offices look at the whole picture?
A kid who has slightly less "personal accomplishment" at a magnet than a kid with slightly more "personal accomplishment" at a non-magnet has roughly even odds of admission (all else being equal). But it is the combination of rigor, GPA, test scores, extras, and accomplishments. You increase your odds by increasing as many of those as possible.
This all makes sense. For STEM magnet programs, how much of the accomplishments should be STEM related? How much do other awards such as in music/ art/ sports matter? Not talking about athlete recruiting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say that it is harder to stand out at a magnet program. I don’t think it gives you an advantage quite honestly. Lots of great reasons to attend a magnet program but college admissions isn’t one of them.
What seems to matter for elite institutions is having some kind of hook - high level athletics, music or national awards in science or CS competitions etc.
you can look at prior years magnet destinations to see how many kids end up at mit or cal tech or CMU. It is highly variable from year to year and it is not clear to me that magnet programs have an edge over a regular high school with a good science program
Where can I find prior years college destinations from the magnet programs? Is it in a separate thread on this forum?
I do not believe they officially release that info. The year my kid graduated, within my kid's close friends of a dozen or so, 1 to P, 2 to MIT, 1 Brown, a few to Cornell, 1 to Yale, and a few to UMD w/ merit. I don't remember anyone to H or Caltech but again this is only about dozen kids or so. I know it's just a data point, nothing more.
My DD and DS graduated from Blair in 2018 and 2016, and have a freshman currently at Blair. DD is a top Ivy doing economics and applied math, DS in Ivy doing finance. I would say that approx 20-30 from the magnet class for both kids went to top schools. and about a half went to UMD (many got great scholarship money). In order to stand out at Blair, agree with OP, high GPA, near perfect SAT/ACT, AP's with 4 and 5's, some leadership in school clubs (though does not matter much), national level awards whether it is USACO, USAMO, USAPhO, quiz bowls and many others. Individual awards are considered more prestigious than team awards for obvious reasons. If kid in research, then Science fair awards going to ISEF and conference presentations/ peer reviewed publications. Service/ volunteering is also big for top schools. I remember my DC was asked in interviews about what they did, as they also included anecdotes about volunteering in essays. All in all, it is certainly more difficult to stand out at Blair as many kids have top academic grades. You have to stand out in many more extracurriculars to be clearly noticed.
This is spot on. High stats are necessary but not sufficient. You also need top notch extracurricular accomplishments- national awards etc. to get into a top 20 school.
Seems right. But this is the rule everywhere, it may feel like the direct competition is other Blair students, but really it's that there are many other Blairs out there, and many other talented students who aren't at magnets. Being at a magnet isn't necessary. Personal accomplishment will trump magnet coursework, too.
I agree with the first sentence of the bolded and disagree with the second. Can't we all just agree that admissions offices look at the whole picture?
A kid who has slightly less "personal accomplishment" at a magnet than a kid with slightly more "personal accomplishment" at a non-magnet has roughly even odds of admission (all else being equal). But it is the combination of rigor, GPA, test scores, extras, and accomplishments. You increase your odds by increasing as many of those as possible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say that it is harder to stand out at a magnet program. I don’t think it gives you an advantage quite honestly. Lots of great reasons to attend a magnet program but college admissions isn’t one of them.
What seems to matter for elite institutions is having some kind of hook - high level athletics, music or national awards in science or CS competitions etc.
you can look at prior years magnet destinations to see how many kids end up at mit or cal tech or CMU. It is highly variable from year to year and it is not clear to me that magnet programs have an edge over a regular high school with a good science program
Where can I find prior years college destinations from the magnet programs? Is it in a separate thread on this forum?
I do not believe they officially release that info. The year my kid graduated, within my kid's close friends of a dozen or so, 1 to P, 2 to MIT, 1 Brown, a few to Cornell, 1 to Yale, and a few to UMD w/ merit. I don't remember anyone to H or Caltech but again this is only about dozen kids or so. I know it's just a data point, nothing more.
My DD and DS graduated from Blair in 2018 and 2016, and have a freshman currently at Blair. DD is a top Ivy doing economics and applied math, DS in Ivy doing finance. I would say that approx 20-30 from the magnet class for both kids went to top schools. and about a half went to UMD (many got great scholarship money). In order to stand out at Blair, agree with OP, high GPA, near perfect SAT/ACT, AP's with 4 and 5's, some leadership in school clubs (though does not matter much), national level awards whether it is USACO, USAMO, USAPhO, quiz bowls and many others. Individual awards are considered more prestigious than team awards for obvious reasons. If kid in research, then Science fair awards going to ISEF and conference presentations/ peer reviewed publications. Service/ volunteering is also big for top schools. I remember my DC was asked in interviews about what they did, as they also included anecdotes about volunteering in essays. All in all, it is certainly more difficult to stand out at Blair as many kids have top academic grades. You have to stand out in many more extracurriculars to be clearly noticed.
This is spot on. High stats are necessary but not sufficient. You also need top notch extracurricular accomplishments- national awards etc. to get into a top 20 school.
Seems right. But this is the rule everywhere, it may feel like the direct competition is other Blair students, but really it's that there are many other Blairs out there, and many other talented students who aren't at magnets. Being at a magnet isn't necessary. Personal accomplishment will trump magnet coursework, too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say that it is harder to stand out at a magnet program. I don’t think it gives you an advantage quite honestly. Lots of great reasons to attend a magnet program but college admissions isn’t one of them.
What seems to matter for elite institutions is having some kind of hook - high level athletics, music or national awards in science or CS competitions etc.
you can look at prior years magnet destinations to see how many kids end up at mit or cal tech or CMU. It is highly variable from year to year and it is not clear to me that magnet programs have an edge over a regular high school with a good science program
Where can I find prior years college destinations from the magnet programs? Is it in a separate thread on this forum?
I do not believe they officially release that info. The year my kid graduated, within my kid's close friends of a dozen or so, 1 to P, 2 to MIT, 1 Brown, a few to Cornell, 1 to Yale, and a few to UMD w/ merit. I don't remember anyone to H or Caltech but again this is only about dozen kids or so. I know it's just a data point, nothing more.
My DD and DS graduated from Blair in 2018 and 2016, and have a freshman currently at Blair. DD is a top Ivy doing economics and applied math, DS in Ivy doing finance. I would say that approx 20-30 from the magnet class for both kids went to top schools. and about a half went to UMD (many got great scholarship money). In order to stand out at Blair, agree with OP, high GPA, near perfect SAT/ACT, AP's with 4 and 5's, some leadership in school clubs (though does not matter much), national level awards whether it is USACO, USAMO, USAPhO, quiz bowls and many others. Individual awards are considered more prestigious than team awards for obvious reasons. If kid in research, then Science fair awards going to ISEF and conference presentations/ peer reviewed publications. Service/ volunteering is also big for top schools. I remember my DC was asked in interviews about what they did, as they also included anecdotes about volunteering in essays. All in all, it is certainly more difficult to stand out at Blair as many kids have top academic grades. You have to stand out in many more extracurriculars to be clearly noticed.
This is spot on. High stats are necessary but not sufficient. You also need top notch extracurricular accomplishments- national awards etc. to get into a top 20 school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say that it is harder to stand out at a magnet program. I don’t think it gives you an advantage quite honestly. Lots of great reasons to attend a magnet program but college admissions isn’t one of them.
What seems to matter for elite institutions is having some kind of hook - high level athletics, music or national awards in science or CS competitions etc.
you can look at prior years magnet destinations to see how many kids end up at mit or cal tech or CMU. It is highly variable from year to year and it is not clear to me that magnet programs have an edge over a regular high school with a good science program
Where can I find prior years college destinations from the magnet programs? Is it in a separate thread on this forum?
I do not believe they officially release that info. The year my kid graduated, within my kid's close friends of a dozen or so, 1 to P, 2 to MIT, 1 Brown, a few to Cornell, 1 to Yale, and a few to UMD w/ merit. I don't remember anyone to H or Caltech but again this is only about dozen kids or so. I know it's just a data point, nothing more.
My DD and DS graduated from Blair in 2018 and 2016, and have a freshman currently at Blair. DD is a top Ivy doing economics and applied math, DS in Ivy doing finance. I would say that approx 20-30 from the magnet class for both kids went to top schools. and about a half went to UMD (many got great scholarship money). In order to stand out at Blair, agree with OP, high GPA, near perfect SAT/ACT, AP's with 4 and 5's, some leadership in school clubs (though does not matter much), national level awards whether it is USACO, USAMO, USAPhO, quiz bowls and many others. Individual awards are considered more prestigious than team awards for obvious reasons. If kid in research, then Science fair awards going to ISEF and conference presentations/ peer reviewed publications. Service/ volunteering is also big for top schools. I remember my DC was asked in interviews about what they did, as they also included anecdotes about volunteering in essays. All in all, it is certainly more difficult to stand out at Blair as many kids have top academic grades. You have to stand out in many more extracurriculars to be clearly noticed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say that it is harder to stand out at a magnet program. I don’t think it gives you an advantage quite honestly. Lots of great reasons to attend a magnet program but college admissions isn’t one of them.
What seems to matter for elite institutions is having some kind of hook - high level athletics, music or national awards in science or CS competitions etc.
you can look at prior years magnet destinations to see how many kids end up at mit or cal tech or CMU. It is highly variable from year to year and it is not clear to me that magnet programs have an edge over a regular high school with a good science program
Where can I find prior years college destinations from the magnet programs? Is it in a separate thread on this forum?
I do not believe they officially release that info. The year my kid graduated, within my kid's close friends of a dozen or so, 1 to P, 2 to MIT, 1 Brown, a few to Cornell, 1 to Yale, and a few to UMD w/ merit. I don't remember anyone to H or Caltech but again this is only about dozen kids or so. I know it's just a data point, nothing more.
My DD and DS graduated from Blair in 2018 and 2016, and have a freshman currently at Blair. DD is a top Ivy doing economics and applied math, DS in Ivy doing finance. I would say that approx 20-30 from the magnet class for both kids went to top schools. and about a half went to UMD (many got great scholarship money). In order to stand out at Blair, agree with OP, high GPA, near perfect SAT/ACT, AP's with 4 and 5's, some leadership in school clubs (though does not matter much), national level awards whether it is USACO, USAMO, USAPhO, quiz bowls and many others. Individual awards are considered more prestigious than team awards for obvious reasons. If kid in research, then Science fair awards going to ISEF and conference presentations/ peer reviewed publications. Service/ volunteering is also big for top schools. I remember my DC was asked in interviews about what they did, as they also included anecdotes about volunteering in essays. All in all, it is certainly more difficult to stand out at Blair as many kids have top academic grades. You have to stand out in many more extracurriculars to be clearly noticed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say that it is harder to stand out at a magnet program. I don’t think it gives you an advantage quite honestly. Lots of great reasons to attend a magnet program but college admissions isn’t one of them.
What seems to matter for elite institutions is having some kind of hook - high level athletics, music or national awards in science or CS competitions etc.
you can look at prior years magnet destinations to see how many kids end up at mit or cal tech or CMU. It is highly variable from year to year and it is not clear to me that magnet programs have an edge over a regular high school with a good science program
Where can I find prior years college destinations from the magnet programs? Is it in a separate thread on this forum?
I do not believe they officially release that info. The year my kid graduated, within my kid's close friends of a dozen or so, 1 to P, 2 to MIT, 1 Brown, a few to Cornell, 1 to Yale, and a few to UMD w/ merit. I don't remember anyone to H or Caltech but again this is only about dozen kids or so. I know it's just a data point, nothing more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say that it is harder to stand out at a magnet program. I don’t think it gives you an advantage quite honestly. Lots of great reasons to attend a magnet program but college admissions isn’t one of them.
What seems to matter for elite institutions is having some kind of hook - high level athletics, music or national awards in science or CS competitions etc.
you can look at prior years magnet destinations to see how many kids end up at mit or cal tech or CMU. It is highly variable from year to year and it is not clear to me that magnet programs have an edge over a regular high school with a good science program
Where can I find prior years college destinations from the magnet programs? Is it in a separate thread on this forum?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say that it is harder to stand out at a magnet program. I don’t think it gives you an advantage quite honestly. Lots of great reasons to attend a magnet program but college admissions isn’t one of them.
What seems to matter for elite institutions is having some kind of hook - high level athletics, music or national awards in science or CS competitions etc.
you can look at prior years magnet destinations to see how many kids end up at mit or cal tech or CMU. It is highly variable from year to year and it is not clear to me that magnet programs have an edge over a regular high school with a good science program
Where can I find prior years college destinations from the magnet programs? Is it in a separate thread on this forum?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say that it is harder to stand out at a magnet program. I don’t think it gives you an advantage quite honestly. Lots of great reasons to attend a magnet program but college admissions isn’t one of them.
What seems to matter for elite institutions is having some kind of hook - high level athletics, music or national awards in science or CS competitions etc.
you can look at prior years magnet destinations to see how many kids end up at mit or cal tech or CMU. It is highly variable from year to year and it is not clear to me that magnet programs have an edge over a regular high school with a good science program
I disagree. My kid went to Blair, and that magnet is relatively small (100 per class), and it offers unique classes and a means to stand out through the variety of rigorous courses. So, instead of the typical array of APs, kids may have Complex Analysis, AI, and/or Thermodynamics mixed in. The transcript also comes with a program description, and the program is recognized by top schools because of its national prominence. It is also intense, and the level of organization and investment kids make in the program may also show in the way they approach college apps. The same is probably true of IB kids.
I do think this could be an issue with large program like TJ, and may be true in high frequency majors like CS or Bio when it comes to Blair. But, overall, I'd say a magnet is a really good thing for college prep.
Thank you for this advice. My DD will be trying for magnet or IB program for next year. She is a good student. Assuming she gets into the magnet program (her first choice), will she have a harder time standing out amongst the 100 kids who are all very bright and talented. Will she have better college admissions in her home school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP I compared the destinations for Walt Whitman (our home school) and RMIB when my kid was thinking of applying for that program. Their results were pretty comparable in terms of results and college acceptances.
Remember RMIB is only about 100 kids.
Right. If 4 kids from WW and 4 kids from RMIB were accepted for a certain school, that means that the RMIB kid had a MUCH greater chance of getting in than the WW kid.
Sure, - I said the end results were comparable not skewed in order to be mis-interpreted as comparable. I'm sorry I don't have the links to hand. I expect they were published in the Bethesda Magazine and those were TOTALS from each school, not differentiating between the IB and the Non-IB students at RM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP I compared the destinations for Walt Whitman (our home school) and RMIB when my kid was thinking of applying for that program. Their results were pretty comparable in terms of results and college acceptances.
Remember RMIB is only about 100 kids.
Right. If 4 kids from WW and 4 kids from RMIB were accepted for a certain school, that means that the RMIB kid had a MUCH greater chance of getting in than the WW kid.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say that it is harder to stand out at a magnet program. I don’t think it gives you an advantage quite honestly. Lots of great reasons to attend a magnet program but college admissions isn’t one of them.
What seems to matter for elite institutions is having some kind of hook - high level athletics, music or national awards in science or CS competitions etc.
you can look at prior years magnet destinations to see how many kids end up at mit or cal tech or CMU. It is highly variable from year to year and it is not clear to me that magnet programs have an edge over a regular high school with a good science program
I disagree. My kid went to Blair, and that magnet is relatively small (100 per class), and it offers unique classes and a means to stand out through the variety of rigorous courses. So, instead of the typical array of APs, kids may have Complex Analysis, AI, and/or Thermodynamics mixed in. The transcript also comes with a program description, and the program is recognized by top schools because of its national prominence. It is also intense, and the level of organization and investment kids make in the program may also show in the way they approach college apps. The same is probably true of IB kids.
I do think this could be an issue with large program like TJ, and may be true in high frequency majors like CS or Bio when it comes to Blair. But, overall, I'd say a magnet is a really good thing for college prep.
and that's resulted in how many Blair students going to MIT? CalTech?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would say that it is harder to stand out at a magnet program. I don’t think it gives you an advantage quite honestly. Lots of great reasons to attend a magnet program but college admissions isn’t one of them.
What seems to matter for elite institutions is having some kind of hook - high level athletics, music or national awards in science or CS competitions etc.
you can look at prior years magnet destinations to see how many kids end up at mit or cal tech or CMU. It is highly variable from year to year and it is not clear to me that magnet programs have an edge over a regular high school with a good science program
I disagree. My kid went to Blair, and that magnet is relatively small (100 per class), and it offers unique classes and a means to stand out through the variety of rigorous courses. So, instead of the typical array of APs, kids may have Complex Analysis, AI, and/or Thermodynamics mixed in. The transcript also comes with a program description, and the program is recognized by top schools because of its national prominence. It is also intense, and the level of organization and investment kids make in the program may also show in the way they approach college apps. The same is probably true of IB kids.
I do think this could be an issue with large program like TJ, and may be true in high frequency majors like CS or Bio when it comes to Blair. But, overall, I'd say a magnet is a really good thing for college prep.