Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump
Plus less ED!!!
ED can be a blessing, who the heck wants to service a younger man daily several years into marriage. This set up is a disaster asking for him to cheat on you.
Me!! Sounds like fun, if hes young and hot. Better than "servicing" a wrinkled old man!
The thing is you likely won’t be the only one servicing him. I would rather have an older guy than a younger guy that is getting serviced by others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump
You have been dealing with some beta males. None of the men I know let their wives boss them around. How the hell is that even attractive? I would never be attracted to a man I had to boss around. I like real men, not immature men that I have to treat like a bad kid.
Almost all the high value men I can think of get bossed around by their wives
![]()
All take him over your old wrinkled "alpha"anyday (this guy is way more alpha than your husband will ever be, alpha men defer to their wives)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump
Plus less ED!!!
ED can be a blessing, who the heck wants to service a younger man daily several years into marriage. This set up is a disaster asking for him to cheat on you.
Me!! Sounds like fun, if hes young and hot. Better than "servicing" a wrinkled old man!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump
You have been dealing with some beta males. None of the men I know let their wives boss them around. How the hell is that even attractive? I would never be attracted to a man I had to boss around. I like real men, not immature men that I have to treat like a bad kid.
anyday (this guy is way more alpha than your husband will ever be, alpha men defer to their wives)Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump
You have been dealing with some beta males. None of the men I know let their wives boss them around. How the hell is that even attractive? I would never be attracted to a man I had to boss around. I like real men, not immature men that I have to treat like a bad kid.
Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump
Plus less ED!!!
ED can be a blessing, who the heck wants to service a younger man daily several years into marriage. This set up is a disaster asking for him to cheat on you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump
Plus less ED!!!
ED can be a blessing, who the heck wants to service a younger man daily several years into marriage. This set up is a disaster asking for him to cheat on you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think same/similar age is ideal. Anything over 6 or 7 is problematic.
What's problematic about a six year age difference? DH is six years older. We haven't had a problem. We are in our 50s.
NP. It's just kind of weird and creepy tbh
Omg. Six or seven year difference is absolutely fine and not weird or creepy at all. Not even pushing it. Example - 56 husband and 50 wife? He may even look younger. Come on now. It’s not like at 27 year difference.
It's creepy to me and many others.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think same/similar age is ideal. Anything over 6 or 7 is problematic.
What's problematic about a six year age difference? DH is six years older. We haven't had a problem. We are in our 50s.
NP. It's just kind of weird and creepy tbh
Omg. Six or seven year difference is absolutely fine and not weird or creepy at all. Not even pushing it. Example - 56 husband and 50 wife? He may even look younger. Come on now. It’s not like at 27 year difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump
Plus less ED!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the guy being anywhere from 5-10 years younger is ideal. Most men act like children anyway, and benefit from being kind of bossed around by a woman. That ends up being the dynamic for most couples anyway, so when both parties go into it with that dynamic at play already (she's older and in authority), then there's no weird rebelliousness that happens, like the men you see here whining that their wife asked them to take out the trash. the rules get established from the jump
Plus less ED!!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think same/similar age is ideal. Anything over 6 or 7 is problematic.
What's problematic about a six year age difference? DH is six years older. We haven't had a problem. We are in our 50s.
NP. It's just kind of weird and creepy tbh
Omg. Six or seven year difference is absolutely fine and not weird or creepy at all. Not even pushing it. Example - 56 husband and 50 wife? He may even look younger. Come on now. It’s not like at 27 year difference.