Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Think back to your 20 something self and ask if you would date a guy that age that lives with his parents. That's the age at which he should move out.
I distinctly remember, twenty-plus years ago, meeting a cute guy at a picnic, learning that he lived at home with his parents, and thinking... ummm... no. Hard pass.
Anonymous wrote:I had to live with mine until I got married at 30. My sister is a PA and still lives with them at 32 so she can pay back her loans. DC is SO expensive, there was no way I could have made it without living with my parents, and I’m super grateful they let me.
Anonymous wrote:My son is also 24. He graduated from college in Dec 2019 and we suggested he live at home for a year and see where his social life was compared to his job. Plus, he could save some money. We said he could if he put $3k a month into a savings plan- over and above the 15% he is putting into his 401k. Covid hit and he is still living at home. He works here too as and not had much of a social life since Covid. We have set next June as a target date for moving out. He is still working from home, but I expect that to change in Jan. A bonus of Covid for him is that he has saved more than the $3k month. He just got a promotion and last Jan started a Masters through his employer - online first as a result of Covid. So, he should be set.
I am glad he did not have an apartment from the get go because he would be alone in it and working from home alone.
Anonymous wrote:Hats how you never move for a job or career or person ever.
And btw, you can earn way more equity in the stock, crypto or direct lending market than buying a depreciating asset with flat mined value and 10% buy/sell fees round trip.
Build equity Bs. Maybe if you don’t move for 30 years and timed it OK. That’s just your money locked up that you put in it doing nothing but at the whims of whatever you sell it at later.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I view my 40 year old cousin who never left his parent's house different than my 35 year old brother that's still living at home.
My cousin has a Ph.D., a career and money. My brother is just a loser just sucking my parents dry.
So, it all depends.
Both situations are odd. And examples of enabling and codependency.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We live in a very expensive area. I agree there is no set time as long as your son is working, going to school, or otherwise making forward progress in his life.
A friend of mine lived with her parents until 25 or so. I thought it was crazy at the time, but then she bought her first house, while I was still renting a shit place and wasting money on other things.
You were ahead in other, perhaps more important, ways. Trust me on this one.
Nope. There is zero difference between those who moved out at 22 vs 25, behaviorally speaking. Financially, however, there is a difference between someone who bought their first real estate in mid-20s vs someone who waited until 30+.
In my family, kids moved out when they had enough money for a downpayment, which was 24 for me and 27 for my brother (he went to grad school).
Why own a home when you are 24?
Anonymous wrote:I view my 40 year old cousin who never left his parent's house different than my 35 year old brother that's still living at home.
My cousin has a Ph.D., a career and money. My brother is just a loser just sucking my parents dry.
So, it all depends.
Anonymous wrote:I know it's longer in some cultures, but I say by 22-23. Whenever college is done. I'd be fine with my child staying with us for a year to save money after school is done, but then, you need to leave the nest.
I moved out as soon as possible (18) and spent my summers on campus as well, working, taking summer classes or doing internships. I never spent more than a month or two living at home after graduating college.