Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Between this thread and the likelihood of universal pre-K, why play with boundaries at all right now? Wait a minute to see what bigger shifts are likely…
Good luck paying teachers with half empty classrooms. Imagine a restaurant that committed to five years of losses without a change to employees. It doesn’t exist.
Im a mediocre teacher riding the status quo. 13 days off paid, plus holidays and health benefits. I’m no Rich Bezos but I’m sure as hell not draining my soul away in a cubicle or some crap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://sungazette.news/arlington-school-enrollment-still-well-below-pre-covid-figure/
State enrollment shows APS declined 4%, FCPS declined 5%, since the beginning of the pandemic. That’s somewhat even more remarkable given some Fairfax zip codes were among the most active for sales last year. National average was 3%, that includes states and districts that stayed shut for a year, and those that returned last summer. Looking for ACPS exact losses but they’re down too.
In other words, coronavirus school closures and losses are likely permanent. If they didn’t come back in August/September, don’t expect them to be back next year.
Maybe there is a demographic dividend in 5-7 years as (existing) families who moved to the suburbs, enroll, although births also declined in 2020-2021, so that’s probably another 1% loss assuming everything returns to normal today.
But districts still need to make payroll, and more specifically don’t be surprised if the new elementary school teacher, losses her job. For other parts of the country, teachers lost typically exit the system and don’t come back. Thanks unions and their Democrat lackeys who repeatedly refused to reopen. Always winning and doing what’s best for the children.
Except the baby boom peaked already and these declines were already forecasted years ago.
Anonymous wrote:https://sungazette.news/arlington-school-enrollment-still-well-below-pre-covid-figure/
State enrollment shows APS declined 4%, FCPS declined 5%, since the beginning of the pandemic. That’s somewhat even more remarkable given some Fairfax zip codes were among the most active for sales last year. National average was 3%, that includes states and districts that stayed shut for a year, and those that returned last summer. Looking for ACPS exact losses but they’re down too.
In other words, coronavirus school closures and losses are likely permanent. If they didn’t come back in August/September, don’t expect them to be back next year.
Maybe there is a demographic dividend in 5-7 years as (existing) families who moved to the suburbs, enroll, although births also declined in 2020-2021, so that’s probably another 1% loss assuming everything returns to normal today.
But districts still need to make payroll, and more specifically don’t be surprised if the new elementary school teacher, losses her job. For other parts of the country, teachers lost typically exit the system and don’t come back. Thanks unions and their Democrat lackeys who repeatedly refused to reopen. Always winning and doing what’s best for the children.
Anonymous wrote:This must vary widely by school. We are Fairfax residents and our pyramid added more students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Between this thread and the likelihood of universal pre-K, why play with boundaries at all right now? Wait a minute to see what bigger shifts are likely…
Good luck paying teachers with half empty classrooms. Imagine a restaurant that committed to five years of losses without a change to employees. It doesn’t exist.
Anonymous wrote:Everyone I know who left for private isn’t returning.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Between this thread and the likelihood of universal pre-K, why play with boundaries at all right now? Wait a minute to see what bigger shifts are likely…
Good luck paying teachers with half empty classrooms. Imagine a restaurant that committed to five years of losses without a change to employees. It doesn’t exist.
Anonymous wrote:Between this thread and the likelihood of universal pre-K, why play with boundaries at all right now? Wait a minute to see what bigger shifts are likely…
Anonymous wrote:Between this thread and the likelihood of universal pre-K, why play with boundaries at all right now? Wait a minute to see what bigger shifts are likely…