Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is going on that week that they need so many subs?
According to my neighbor, who is a teacher, because of the weird way the days off fell that week, tons of teachers requested the whole week off.
Yes, but the were told they couldn’t have those two days off (3rd and 5th.) Why leave was granted I have no idea, it wasn’t supposed to be.
I don't think they can deny sick leave requests. All a teacher has to do is schedule an appt that day, and then they can take the whole day off.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is going on that week that they need so many subs?
According to my neighbor, who is a teacher, because of the weird way the days off fell that week, tons of teachers requested the whole week off.
Yes, but the were told they couldn’t have those two days off (3rd and 5th.) Why leave was granted I have no idea, it wasn’t supposed to be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is going on that week that they need so many subs?
According to my neighbor, who is a teacher, because of the weird way the days off fell that week, tons of teachers requested the whole week off.
Yes, but the were told they couldn’t have those two days off (3rd and 5th.) Why leave was granted I have no idea, it wasn’t supposed to be.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My thoughts are that they need to raise the wage for subs.
+1. Subs have been underpaid in certain districts for close to a decade. The chickens are coming home to roost. Some school systems pay subs a premium to sub on the days before breaks because so many people take off. It wouldn't surprise me if the same thing happens in FCPS.
Well, the government has been dumping money on people for the past year and now it’s like, gee why doesn’t anyone want to work? Idiocy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is going on that week that they need so many subs?
According to my neighbor, who is a teacher, because of the weird way the days off fell that week, tons of teachers requested the whole week off.
Anonymous wrote:What is going on that week that they need so many subs?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand they might have booked trainers for that Friday 10/28 staff development day, but I would like to see them try to switch that to one of the asynchronous learning days instead.
I was a teacher before constant training was offered/required. I don't understand the need for so much training. My opinion: it is to justify all the people who work in higher headquarters. They have to justify their existence.
Is it really worth the expense and disruption?
X 1000.
As a sub, I agree. 99% of my subbing is for training, not teacher absences. As a parent, I find it appalling the kids miss so much instructional time. The subs don’t actually teach (I would, but that is not the plans I am given.)
The only time I will teach is if the teacher knew I was going to be there way ahead of time.
Anonymous wrote:If they can’t staff the schools I’m not sure what else they can do short term.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand they might have booked trainers for that Friday 10/28 staff development day, but I would like to see them try to switch that to one of the asynchronous learning days instead.
I was a teacher before constant training was offered/required. I don't understand the need for so much training. My opinion: it is to justify all the people who work in higher headquarters. They have to justify their existence.
Is it really worth the expense and disruption?
X 1000.
As a sub, I agree. 99% of my subbing is for training, not teacher absences. As a parent, I find it appalling the kids miss so much instructional time. The subs don’t actually teach (I would, but that is not the plans I am given.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand they might have booked trainers for that Friday 10/28 staff development day, but I would like to see them try to switch that to one of the asynchronous learning days instead.
I was a teacher before constant training was offered/required. I don't understand the need for so much training. My opinion: it is to justify all the people who work in higher headquarters. They have to justify their existence.
Is it really worth the expense and disruption?
X 1000.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My thoughts are that they need to raise the wage for subs.
+1. Subs have been underpaid in certain districts for close to a decade. The chickens are coming home to roost. Some school systems pay subs a premium to sub on the days before breaks because so many people take off. It wouldn't surprise me if the same thing happens in FCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand they might have booked trainers for that Friday 10/28 staff development day, but I would like to see them try to switch that to one of the asynchronous learning days instead.
I was a teacher before constant training was offered/required. I don't understand the need for so much training. My opinion: it is to justify all the people who work in higher headquarters. They have to justify their existence.
Is it really worth the expense and disruption?