Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t want to have to charge my car for 30 minutes every 2 hours on a road trip. I will wait for the infrastructure to catch up.
Does it change your mind if it's 20 minutes every 3 hours?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't expect anyone to trade in a car they already have, and I realize that many (most, even) people can't afford to buy electric cars. But if you're driving around with temporary tags on a new gas-burning car that costs more than our new $45,000 electric car did, what is wrong with you? If you can afford a new Porsche Macan, you can afford a Tesla or an electric Audi or something that doesn't contribute as much to destroying the world. (They even make electric Porsches! They'll soon be making electric Macans!) Do people just not think about climate change at all when they're in the process of dropping $60,000 on a car?
1. Someday the technology will be there for a battery powered car that does what I want it to do. My guess is 30-40 years from now. I will buy one then.
2. Gas is not going anywhere. We will still be driving gas cars in 30 years.
3. No I do not consider climate change when purchasing a car or really doing anything else.
Do you not believe in it? Do you have kids?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are you under the impression that the electricity just wills its way in to existence?
Accounting for how the electricity is produced, the environmental costs of producing the car, etc., an electric car is cleaner than a gas car within 27,000 to 40,000 miles driven: https://www.caranddriver.com/features/a36877102/20-questions-evs-environmentally-friendly/
If you care about the environment, maybe you should consider how much you are driving. Big different if you put a few thousand miles on like me vs. 27,000 to 40,000. Even when I worked and used my car for work, I put on 12-15K. You are driving way to much.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t want to have to charge my car for 30 minutes every 2 hours on a road trip. I will wait for the infrastructure to catch up.
Does it change your mind if it's 20 minutes every 3 hours?
If you really care about the environment drive less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t want to have to charge my car for 30 minutes every 2 hours on a road trip. I will wait for the infrastructure to catch up.
Does it change your mind if it's 20 minutes every 3 hours?
Anonymous wrote:I don’t want to have to charge my car for 30 minutes every 2 hours on a road trip. I will wait for the infrastructure to catch up.
Anonymous wrote:
Refueling takes 5 minutes. And we can actually make it 500 miles on a full tank, although we usually have to stop once to go to the bathroom. A 200 mile range means 2 recharging stops, and normally we don't stop for more than 10-15 minutes total in a trip.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because I don’t want an electric car. I don’t want to have to plan my trip to charge my car.
This.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't expect anyone to trade in a car they already have, and I realize that many (most, even) people can't afford to buy electric cars. But if you're driving around with temporary tags on a new gas-burning car that costs more than our new $45,000 electric car did, what is wrong with you? If you can afford a new Porsche Macan, you can afford a Tesla or an electric Audi or something that doesn't contribute as much to destroying the world. (They even make electric Porsches! They'll soon be making electric Macans!) Do people just not think about climate change at all when they're in the process of dropping $60,000 on a car?
1. Someday the technology will be there for a battery powered car that does what I want it to do. My guess is 30-40 years from now. I will buy one then.
2. Gas is not going anywhere. We will still be driving gas cars in 30 years.
3. No I do not consider climate change when purchasing a car or really doing anything else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What a presumptuous and arrogant question (and I am fully in support of the move to electric)
I don't think it's presumptuous to ask why people are buying expensive cars that burn gasoline when they could buy electric ones instead (and in many cases, cheaper electric ones!), but I also think we're past the point where we can afford to worry about hurting people's feelings if we're going to do anything effective about climate change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't expect anyone to trade in a car they already have, and I realize that many (most, even) people can't afford to buy electric cars. But if you're driving around with temporary tags on a new gas-burning car that costs more than our new $45,000 electric car did, what is wrong with you? If you can afford a new Porsche Macan, you can afford a Tesla or an electric Audi or something that doesn't contribute as much to destroying the world. (They even make electric Porsches! They'll soon be making electric Macans!) Do people just not think about climate change at all when they're in the process of dropping $60,000 on a car?
2. Gas is not going anywhere. We will still be driving gas cars in 30 years.
Anonymous wrote:Because I don’t want an electric car. I don’t want to have to plan my trip to charge my car.