Anonymous wrote:This is a spin-off of another thread where a late 30s woman was asking how to meet men, and of course mentions the “well-educated” criterion multiple times.
I just don’t get this. And I should preface this by saying I’m a guy with an Ivy degree. But would you ladies not consider someone who owns his own construction business or a few Subway franchises and earns $150,000 per year? (Or we could make it 15 Subway franchises and an income of $600,000 if that is your requirement.) This is not about income – that part I understand.
But why the obsession with “well-educated” men? Do you not understand that for many people, going to college/graduate school is a terrible life decision? I mean, there was a recent article about NYU film grads coming out of the Master’s program with $30,000/year jobs and $250,000 in debt. Surely women in their late 30s recognize that the dating market is not skewed in their favor. Why add yet *another* filter that further winnows down your available options?
Anonymous wrote:I agree with you, OP. With women now 60% of college graduates, this higher education criteria is going to leave more women without a mate. FWIW, I’m an attorney and DH doesn’t have a degree. He makes a good salary at a job he loves. We still have intelligent conversations. People wrongly equate intelligence with education. My experience working in the government has proven that plenty of people with degrees are complete idiots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Well-educated" = financially well off. The same as when women say they want a man who is "ambitious".
LOL is this a joke?
There are FAR TOO MANY well educated americans who went to college, are deep in student debt and live paycheck to paycheck.
This comment is hilarious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is incel-speak for “how dare women have standards.”
That's exactly what it is
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Education is one of the new status symbols. Newer generations are less materialistic but not less status-seeking.
It’s not a symbol. Higher education actually DOES carry higher status.
Ugh. What do you mean, it’s not a symbol? Status is a symbol, it’s not reflecting an objective, tangible thing that you can grasp. It’s something that humans came up with, and therefore is symbolic. We choose things like money, beauty, education as symbols of status, but we could easily have chosen other things. My point is, you say that higher education carries higher status, as if that is some fact of nature. It doesn’t carry higher status any more than any other thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Education is one of the new status symbols. Newer generations are less materialistic but not less status-seeking.
It’s not a symbol. Higher education actually DOES carry higher status.
Anonymous wrote:I agree OP. Neither my spouse or i have degrees. We live ineastern moco, our one kid goes to a Christian private, we travel, have newish cars, can afford to take care of our pets, eat out etc…..I actually wonder the same thing about people looking for nannies. They want newborn nannies with degrees. It doesn’t take a degree to love and care for a baby.
Anonymous wrote:"Well-educated" = financially well off. The same as when women say they want a man who is "ambitious".