Anonymous wrote:Kids this age cannot give consent. It is not ok and it needs to go. I do Scouts and this is an issue--child on child abuse is 1/3 of all abuse. It needs to be treated with such care. I just cannot believe FCPS cannot see that some things need to go.

It is between two 4th grade boys.

?????

you apparently haven't read the Old Testament very closely

deflection--

Kids this age cannot give consent. It is not ok and it needs to go. I do Scouts and this is an issue--child on child abuse is 1/3 of all abuse. It needs to be treated with such care. I just cannot believe FCPS cannot see that some things need to go.

Fourth grade boys sucking each other off. THAT is what it is. It is disgusting and regularlizes abuse. It needs to go. This is not even a close call.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“’He talked about old times at the church, but never mentioned our penises or the fact that he never said ten words to me after our little foray in the bushes. Not a single reference to holding or tugging or sucking d**ks. All I could think about while he was chatting me up was his little salamander between my fourth-grade fingers, rapidly engorging with blood,’”

Disgusting. Definitely don’t want this in high school.

4th grader??? I would have been okay if the book was about adults but not under-aged kids. What message are we sending here? What are we encouraging? HS kids should go out and look for elementary school kids to bang? FCPS and many of these school districts are becoming lawless.

I also agree that the Bible should be banned in school.

That’s good, I guess?
Not sure what that has to do with pedophilia. The books they referenced last night are pretty bad. It’s shameful they are defending these books under the guise of lgbtq support. This is graphic sexual writing about a 10 year old boy.

you apparently haven't read the Old Testament very closely

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did thre right wing media send out the bat signal to ban books now? Every parent has the right to opt out of books for their kods but the nuts at tonight’s school board meeting want to pray and ban books. The latest idiot wouldn’t stop talking when her time was up and made the Board have to recess. No rules for these sheep. Where did these backwards folks come from?

Looks like Parents Defending Education (full of Koch associates and Trumphumpers) is all over this manufactured "issue":

https://twitter.com/Think_Schultz
https://twitter.com/AsraNomani

Someone needs to be. Frisch thinks this is great. Someone needs to bring this up.

+1

This shouldn’t be political. Frisch is disgusting for blanketing this as an lgbt support issue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did thre right wing media send out the bat signal to ban books now? Every parent has the right to opt out of books for their kods but the nuts at tonight’s school board meeting want to pray and ban books. The latest idiot wouldn’t stop talking when her time was up and made the Board have to recess. No rules for these sheep. Where did these backwards folks come from?

It only going to get worse.

They are emboldened because of Don the con.

We must vote the GOP out or we are hosed.

These freaks want control we must stop them. Religion and book banning should not be in public school.

Neither should explicit books, whether between two boys or a boy and girl. Or man and woman, or two men or two women, etc.

Anonymous wrote:Did thre right wing media send out the bat signal to ban books now? Every parent has the right to opt out of books for their kods but the nuts at tonight’s school board meeting want to pray and ban books. The latest idiot wouldn’t stop talking when her time was up and made the Board have to recess. No rules for these sheep. Where did these backwards folks come from?

It only going to get worse.

They are emboldened because of Don the con.

We must vote the GOP out or we are hosed.

These freaks want control we must stop them. Religion and book banning should not be in public school.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did thre right wing media send out the bat signal to ban books now? Every parent has the right to opt out of books for their kods but the nuts at tonight’s school board meeting want to pray and ban books. The latest idiot wouldn’t stop talking when her time was up and made the Board have to recess. No rules for these sheep. Where did these backwards folks come from?

Looks like Parents Defending Education (full of Koch associates and Trumphumpers) is all over this manufactured "issue":

https://twitter.com/Think_Schultz
https://twitter.com/AsraNomani

Someone needs to be. Frisch thinks this is great. Someone needs to bring this up.

Anonymous wrote:Did thre right wing media send out the bat signal to ban books now? Every parent has the right to opt out of books for their kods but the nuts at tonight’s school board meeting want to pray and ban books. The latest idiot wouldn’t stop talking when her time was up and made the Board have to recess. No rules for these sheep. Where did these backwards folks come from?

Looks like Parents Defending Education (full of Koch associates and Trumphumpers) is all over this manufactured "issue":

https://twitter.com/Think_Schultz
https://twitter.com/AsraNomani

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“’He talked about old times at the church, but never mentioned our penises or the fact that he never said ten words to me after our little foray in the bushes. Not a single reference to holding or tugging or sucking d**ks. All I could think about while he was chatting me up was his little salamander between my fourth-grade fingers, rapidly engorging with blood,’”

Disgusting. Definitely don’t want this in high school.

4th grader??? I would have been okay if the book was about adults but not under-aged kids. What message are we sending here? What are we encouraging? HS kids should go out and look for elementary school kids to bang? FCPS and many of these school districts are becoming lawless.

The context is that the main character has like one friend, his bf. This friend was making homophobic comments but main character didnt say anything like “come on man, stop” because he had this secret in his past re hooking up with this kid.

Want to clarify—when I said “kid” i meant that the main character had this homosexual experience as a 4th grader with another 4th grader when they were in 4th grade. Now they are grown up but main character is remembering the acts. The person who he forayed in the bushes with is now a successful businessman in town who doesnt talk about his same-sex experimentation.

Is 4th grade a bit young for sexual experimentation? Yes, to me it is. But the book doesnt say “you are in 4th grade, go have gay sex”. It is telling a story about the main characters life, of which this was a part.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“’He talked about old times at the church, but never mentioned our penises or the fact that he never said ten words to me after our little foray in the bushes. Not a single reference to holding or tugging or sucking d**ks. All I could think about while he was chatting me up was his little salamander between my fourth-grade fingers, rapidly engorging with blood,’”

Disgusting. Definitely don’t want this in high school.

4th grader??? I would have been okay if the book was about adults but not under-aged kids. What message are we sending here? What are we encouraging? HS kids should go out and look for elementary school kids to bang? FCPS and many of these school districts are becoming lawless.

The context is that the main character has like one friend, his bf. This friend was making homophobic comments but main character didnt say anything like “come on man, stop” because he had this secret in his past re hooking up with this kid.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“’He talked about old times at the church, but never mentioned our penises or the fact that he never said ten words to me after our little foray in the bushes. Not a single reference to holding or tugging or sucking d**ks. All I could think about while he was chatting me up was his little salamander between my fourth-grade fingers, rapidly engorging with blood,’”

Disgusting. Definitely don’t want this in high school.

4th grader??? I would have been okay if the book was about adults but not under-aged kids. What message are we sending here? What are we encouraging? HS kids should go out and look for elementary school kids to bang? FCPS and many of these school districts are becoming lawless.

I also agree that the Bible should be banned in school.

That’s good, I guess?
Not sure what that has to do with pedophilia. The books they referenced last night are pretty bad. It’s shameful they are defending these books under the guise of lgbtq support. This is graphic sexual writing about a 10 year old boy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“’He talked about old times at the church, but never mentioned our penises or the fact that he never said ten words to me after our little foray in the bushes. Not a single reference to holding or tugging or sucking d**ks. All I could think about while he was chatting me up was his little salamander between my fourth-grade fingers, rapidly engorging with blood,’”

Disgusting. Definitely don’t want this in high school.

4th grader??? I would have been okay if the book was about adults but not under-aged kids. What message are we sending here? What are we encouraging? HS kids should go out and look for elementary school kids to bang? FCPS and many of these school districts are becoming lawless.

I also agree that the Bible should be banned in school.

That book sounds quite disgusting, but is it any worse than Flowers in the Attic which many people read in HS or younger? (I genuinely don’t know, I haven’t read either book)