Anonymous
Post 09/23/2021 08:09     Subject: Re:Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
Most of DH former gfs were more attractive. He would say he married me b/c of attraction that grew with more time while with others the attraction lessened with more time.
Anonymous
Post 09/23/2021 07:20     Subject: Re:Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
Anonymous wrote:She has to be physically attractive enough to get my attention but she doesn’t have to be beautiful. Once there is an attraction then it comes down to brains, a sense of humor etc etc plus great sex.



You say this, but I haven't found this to be true in real life, especially the highlighted portion.
Anonymous
Post 09/23/2021 07:19     Subject: Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
This thread explains clearly why so many of you are in miserable marriages, even the ones that always post about how happy they are and their spouse is their bff.
Anonymous
Post 09/23/2021 07:18     Subject: Re:Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:She has to be physically attractive enough to get my attention but she doesn’t have to be beautiful. Once there is an attraction then it comes down to brains, a sense of humor etc etc plus great sex.


Exactly this. I'd say that when I was in my 20s, I found more than 80 % of the women I met attractive physically, but that's a low bar. Finding someone you match with emotionally and intellectually is a lot rarer.


Anonymous
Post 09/23/2021 07:17     Subject: Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
Anonymous wrote:My husband had some hot but crazy girlfriends. I'm pretty sure he didn't find me nearly as "attractive" as he found them, but he married me because I'm level-headed and capable.



This is not the positive you think it is.
Anonymous
Post 09/23/2021 07:14     Subject: Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Her style and how she carries herself would be a bigger factor than natural beauty.

I would rather a woman have average looks and be presentable/sophisticated than a gorgeous woman with no style or sophistication.


Said no guy ever. Men don’t understand style or fashion. Outside the extreme, they don’t care.


I am a man, and I think I am entitled to my opinion. Maybe not everyman thinks this way, but I do.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2021 23:50     Subject: Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most men are willing to go down in looks to go up in great personality. To a man, having a great personality means being pleasant to be around, cooperative, understanding, calm, centered, and kind. If you can do all of these, then you are a keeper. He'll be running to buy a ring.


HA! I was all those things and hot when I was age 20-30. No guy wanted more than casual seggs until I met my DH at 30.


I could have written this post. I think that a lot of men think that less attractive women make more “stable” and “presentable” wives and girlfriends. Then they complain down the line that their wives won’t have sex. Men are stupid.


You have no idea what men actually think. You are stupid.

Says the type of plain woman referenced in the post.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2021 22:26     Subject: Re:Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
Anonymous wrote:She has to be physically attractive enough to get my attention but she doesn’t have to be beautiful. Once there is an attraction then it comes down to brains, a sense of humor etc etc plus great sex.


Exactly this. I'd say that when I was in my 20s, I found more than 80 % of the women I met attractive physically, but that's a low bar. Finding someone you match with emotionally and intellectually is a lot rarer.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2021 22:17     Subject: Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
I don’t care what someone else thinks is attractive. Like an earlier poster said, if you love them, they become attractive. Unconventional looks can be very attractive anyway.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2021 21:59     Subject: Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
My husband had some hot but crazy girlfriends. I'm pretty sure he didn't find me nearly as "attractive" as he found them, but he married me because I'm level-headed and capable.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2021 21:52     Subject: Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most men are willing to go down in looks to go up in great personality. To a man, having a great personality means being pleasant to be around, cooperative, understanding, calm, centered, and kind. If you can do all of these, then you are a keeper. He'll be running to buy a ring.


disagree. men always think they can do better. Most WOMEN are willing to go down in looks for other qualities.


Namely, his money.


I’m the pp. yes, I was thinking that, but wanted everyone to draw their own conclusions.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2021 21:50     Subject: Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most men are willing to go down in looks to go up in great personality. To a man, having a great personality means being pleasant to be around, cooperative, understanding, calm, centered, and kind. If you can do all of these, then you are a keeper. He'll be running to buy a ring.


HA! I was all those things and hot when I was age 20-30. No guy wanted more than casual seggs until I met my DH at 30.


I could have written this post. I think that a lot of men think that less attractive women make more “stable” and “presentable” wives and girlfriends. Then they complain down the line that their wives won’t have sex. Men are stupid.


You have no idea what men actually think. You are stupid.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2021 21:48     Subject: Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Most men are willing to go down in looks to go up in great personality. To a man, having a great personality means being pleasant to be around, cooperative, understanding, calm, centered, and kind. If you can do all of these, then you are a keeper. He'll be running to buy a ring.


disagree. men always think they can do better. Most WOMEN are willing to go down in looks for other qualities.


Namely, his money.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2021 21:27     Subject: Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
Anonymous wrote:Let me put it to you this way… If you had a choice between a girl that’s an 11, but she’s a witch vs a girl that’s a 7 and totally awesome and you broke BOTH your arms, which girl would wipe your azz for you?

Some of you just can’t fathom that a woman can be both beautiful and have an amazing personality.
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2021 20:52     Subject: Re:Would you marry a woman who is not conventionally beautiful/you view as less physically attractive
Anonymous wrote:No but I laugh when I see all those fat tatted rejects on Tinder making outlandish demands for commitment from high-quality men.


Maybe some of them are beautiful on the inside. You are definitely not.