Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regular ear piercings but anything else has to wait until they're 18 and pay for it themselves. We've gone over extensively the piercings that can be more problematic like tongue piercings.
Not trying to call out this poster specifically, but I see a lot of references like the bolded. And I find it interesting. It seems that much of the concern is based on doing something that society does not view as "regular." Of course, there are issues with certain piercings that can lead to permanent damage, but most do not- nose, cartilage, navel, etc. The only difference is what is "regular" or "normal." I side on letting my kid (15yo) get whatever she wants that she can pay for, so long as it isn't permanent. I don't set up conflicts on things that are personal expression. I have LOTS of battles to fight elsewhere!
Your post brings up an interesting point, many of these opinions are based around white, fundamental Christian norms even if the posters are not aware of it. For example, the idea that more than one ear piercing or a nose piercing is trashy.
That very well may be, but I challenge you to go into professional setting and observe if the people running things have a bunch of piercings in their face or tattoos all over their body. My GYN is not white or male. Neither is the cardiologist I saw a few years ago. And pretty much all of the people I work with in the USG (more white and male than elsewhere, but not entirely) don't have visible piercings or tattoos.
The simple truth is that people don't take you seriously as an adult if you are all tatted up and punched full of holes. Make of it what you will.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our policy is no piercings or tattoos until 21. Not even ears.
+1. Same. Takes the discussion and begging off the able. When they are of legal age and sound mind, they can make holes in themselves.
How do you enforce that? You can’t stop an 18 year old from getting a piercing or tattoo.
You threaten to stop paying their college tuition.
Honestly, it’s all about family rules and expectations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our policy is no piercings or tattoos until 21. Not even ears.
+1. Same. Takes the discussion and begging off the able. When they are of legal age and sound mind, they can make holes in themselves.
How do you enforce that? You can’t stop an 18 year old from getting a piercing or tattoo.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regular ear piercings but anything else has to wait until they're 18 and pay for it themselves. We've gone over extensively the piercings that can be more problematic like tongue piercings.
Not trying to call out this poster specifically, but I see a lot of references like the bolded. And I find it interesting. It seems that much of the concern is based on doing something that society does not view as "regular." Of course, there are issues with certain piercings that can lead to permanent damage, but most do not- nose, cartilage, navel, etc. The only difference is what is "regular" or "normal." I side on letting my kid (15yo) get whatever she wants that she can pay for, so long as it isn't permanent. I don't set up conflicts on things that are personal expression. I have LOTS of battles to fight elsewhere!
Your post brings up an interesting point, many of these opinions are based around white, fundamental Christian norms even if the posters are not aware of it. For example, the idea that more than one ear piercing or a nose piercing is trashy.
Anonymous wrote:Can you show it to Dad? Can it cause damage (that one is specifically for something like the tongue). Thats our only policy. That and to make sure its a reputable and clean place.
All it ended up being was double ears and a helix.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
My kids would have a heart attack if they knew about my piercing that they can't see.
My policy is make a case, I will listen, we can discuss pros and cons, then go from there.
Go on...
I have a hood piercing
Is that something you get on your car?
Do you really not know the female anatomy?
Do you really not know sarcasm? -NP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our policy is no piercings or tattoos until 21. Not even ears.
+1. Same. Takes the discussion and begging off the able. When they are of legal age and sound mind, they can make holes in themselves.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Regular ear piercings but anything else has to wait until they're 18 and pay for it themselves. We've gone over extensively the piercings that can be more problematic like tongue piercings.
Not trying to call out this poster specifically, but I see a lot of references like the bolded. And I find it interesting. It seems that much of the concern is based on doing something that society does not view as "regular." Of course, there are issues with certain piercings that can lead to permanent damage, but most do not- nose, cartilage, navel, etc. The only difference is what is "regular" or "normal." I side on letting my kid (15yo) get whatever she wants that she can pay for, so long as it isn't permanent. I don't set up conflicts on things that are personal expression. I have LOTS of battles to fight elsewhere!
Anonymous wrote:Our policy is no piercings or tattoos until 21. Not even ears.