Anonymous wrote:No Gonzaga?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This list makes no sense if you compare it to previous years. Sidwell has more finalists than it normally would. St. Albans only one. GDS only one. None for Gonzaga (which typically has 5ish). Nothing for Walls.
My kids don't go to any of these schools, but, I wonder what the deal is. This isn't something I'd be bragging about over at Sidwell. I think this list is really weird and possibly incomplete or manipulated in some way.
Sidewall had 13 last year and 15 this year. Are you implying that these strong results are something g the kids should be proud of because it must have been some kind of weird fluke to increase by, gasp, 2 student semi-finalists, and that that indicates some kind of manipulation. What’s “weird” about that? Like the posters who suggested sone kind of push by Sidwell for students to provide SAT scores, even though that would not have been available as the school had host a psat test last year. Could you possibly simply offer recognition if a job well done by these kids? And I haven’t seen any bragging by Sidwell. But to imply that the kids gain the award through some nefarious process such that they and their parents shouldn’t be proud us simply inappropriate. Kind of like arguing that am election is “rigged”, and implicating the prevailing party, just because some people didn’t get the result they want.
I counted 16 for Sidwell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This list makes no sense if you compare it to previous years. Sidwell has more finalists than it normally would. St. Albans only one. GDS only one. None for Gonzaga (which typically has 5ish). Nothing for Walls.
My kids don't go to any of these schools, but, I wonder what the deal is. This isn't something I'd be bragging about over at Sidwell. I think this list is really weird and possibly incomplete or manipulated in some way.
Sidewall had 13 last year and 15 this year. Are you implying that these strong results are something g the kids should be proud of because it must have been some kind of weird fluke to increase by, gasp, 2 student semi-finalists, and that that indicates some kind of manipulation. What’s “weird” about that? Like the posters who suggested sone kind of push by Sidwell for students to provide SAT scores, even though that would not have been available as the school had host a psat test last year. Could you possibly simply offer recognition if a job well done by these kids? And I haven’t seen any bragging by Sidwell. But to imply that the kids gain the award through some nefarious process such that they and their parents shouldn’t be proud us simply inappropriate. Kind of like arguing that am election is “rigged”, and implicating the prevailing party, just because some people didn’t get the result they want.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a former NMSF myself, I can’t figure out for the life of me why anyone cares about this.
Same. It varies from class to class and is not a predictor of college admissions or success later in life. Knowing that a sidwell parent is likely posting this stuff is a complete deterrent from the school, though!
Anonymous wrote:I expect this has alot to do with the fact that Wilson didn't offer a PSAT or SAT to juniors last year but the privates did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sidwell offered the PSAT on campus, so the kids didn't use the SAT route.
Many did.
How is that possible? If you school offered the PSAT, you were not eligible to use the easier AE.
Same question here: if your school offered PSAT, will you be able to submit SAT as an alternative?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a former NMSF myself, I can’t figure out for the life of me why anyone cares about this.
I'm also a former NMSF from the 1980s. While these tests measure a certain degree of knowledge, the score is not that indicative of someone's intelligence; rather, the score is more indicative of how well someone takes standardized tests.
Anonymous wrote:This list makes no sense if you compare it to previous years. Sidwell has more finalists than it normally would. St. Albans only one. GDS only one. None for Gonzaga (which typically has 5ish). Nothing for Walls.
My kids don't go to any of these schools, but, I wonder what the deal is. This isn't something I'd be bragging about over at Sidwell. I think this list is really weird and possibly incomplete or manipulated in some way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sidwell offered the PSAT on campus, so the kids didn't use the SAT route.
Many did.
How is that possible? If you school offered the PSAT, you were not eligible to use the easier AE.
Same question here: if your school offered PSAT, will you be able to submit SAT as an alternative?
No.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sidwell offered the PSAT on campus, so the kids didn't use the SAT route.
Many did.
How is that possible? If you school offered the PSAT, you were not eligible to use the easier AE.
Same question here: if your school offered PSAT, will you be able to submit SAT as an alternative?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sidwell offered the PSAT on campus, so the kids didn't use the SAT route.
Many did.
How is that possible? If you school offered the PSAT, you were not eligible to use the easier AE.
Anonymous wrote:As a former NMSF myself, I can’t figure out for the life of me why anyone cares about this.
Anonymous wrote:As a former NMSF myself, I can’t figure out for the life of me why anyone cares about this.