Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't have a dream school. Be realistic.
Exactly - I think it's the same thing with people who talk about buying their dream house or dream car or dream whatever. It sets unrealistic expectations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s one reason why top schools look for students that are athletes, artists, etc.
For students that lean on grades only for their self esteem will burn out most at top school because they can handle not being “the best” student.
This is overblown and a myth perpetuated on mommy forums. It's not about being rattled because you're not "the best," it's almost always because the kid received years and years of FAKE GRADES in a non-competitive k-12. And if you did not attend a top prep school or elite magnet program, you not only received fake inflated grades you "competed" in a school where 50-95% of your classmates were lazy underachievers. You never actually competed.
So of course the kid is a fish out of water academically and gets rattled mentally at a strong college where 95-100% of their peers are aggressive, polished, savvy and over-prepared. Peers just seem to know all the angles and how to play the "game". You feel like an idiot and no, no matter what people claim, you don't "catch up" to them in a year. It's not about being "the best," it's about being nowhere near their polished peers – and these mismatches often don't even show up on high school GPAs or ACT/SAT. So on paper you might not see it, but the differences are stark.
Holy load of arrogant crap. If you did not attend a top prep school or elite magnet program you received fake grades and you never competed?
For the most part, correct. But nobody calls their baby ugly — your kid is brilliant and where you bought a home the high school is ranked such and such. Blah blah blah. I can tell by your tone you can’t handle the truth.
Lol. Pretty sure I am not the one with a "tone" is this little discussion.
Lots of ugly lazy fake grades little babies are killing it at colleges that are as competitive as it gets.
Anonymous wrote:Your kid needs to find a reason to be excited about a few schools at the safety, target and reach levels. That way, no matter what happens, she will be content. Get rid of the "dream" nonsense now. I had a dream school. It didn't work out and I was sad to go to the school I ended up getting into. Of course, it all worked out but if someone had knocked some sense into me early on, I would have been happier and adjusted better.
I took this to heart with my own two (both currently in college). They created lists composed entirely of schools they would be happy to attend. Their orienting point was intended major but it doesn't have to be that. Once the first admit came through for each of them, they were so happy because they knew they were going to land at a great place no matter what.
Best of luck. It's a jungle out there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s one reason why top schools look for students that are athletes, artists, etc.
For students that lean on grades only for their self esteem will burn out most at top school because they can handle not being “the best” student.
This is overblown and a myth perpetuated on mommy forums. It's not about being rattled because you're not "the best," it's almost always because the kid received years and years of FAKE GRADES in a non-competitive k-12. And if you did not attend a top prep school or elite magnet program, you not only received fake inflated grades you "competed" in a school where 50-95% of your classmates were lazy underachievers. You never actually competed.
So of course the kid is a fish out of water academically and gets rattled mentally at a strong college where 95-100% of their peers are aggressive, polished, savvy and over-prepared. Peers just seem to know all the angles and how to play the "game". You feel like an idiot and no, no matter what people claim, you don't "catch up" to them in a year. It's not about being "the best," it's about being nowhere near their polished peers – and these mismatches often don't even show up on high school GPAs or ACT/SAT. So on paper you might not see it, but the differences are stark.
Holy load of arrogant crap. If you did not attend a top prep school or elite magnet program you received fake grades and you never competed?
For the most part, correct. But nobody calls their baby ugly — your kid is brilliant and where you bought a home the high school is ranked such and such. Blah blah blah. I can tell by your tone you can’t handle the truth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s one reason why top schools look for students that are athletes, artists, etc.
For students that lean on grades only for their self esteem will burn out most at top school because they can handle not being “the best” student.
This is overblown and a myth perpetuated on mommy forums. It's not about being rattled because you're not "the best," it's almost always because the kid received years and years of FAKE GRADES in a non-competitive k-12. And if you did not attend a top prep school or elite magnet program, you not only received fake inflated grades you "competed" in a school where 50-95% of your classmates were lazy underachievers. You never actually competed.
So of course the kid is a fish out of water academically and gets rattled mentally at a strong college where 95-100% of their peers are aggressive, polished, savvy and over-prepared. Peers just seem to know all the angles and how to play the "game". You feel like an idiot and no, no matter what people claim, you don't "catch up" to them in a year. It's not about being "the best," it's about being nowhere near their polished peers – and these mismatches often don't even show up on high school GPAs or ACT/SAT. So on paper you might not see it, but the differences are stark.
Holy load of arrogant crap. If you did not attend a top prep school or elite magnet program you received fake grades and you never competed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s one reason why top schools look for students that are athletes, artists, etc.
For students that lean on grades only for their self esteem will burn out most at top school because they can handle not being “the best” student.
This is overblown and a myth perpetuated on mommy forums. It's not about being rattled because you're not "the best," it's almost always because the kid received years and years of FAKE GRADES in a non-competitive k-12. And if you did not attend a top prep school or elite magnet program, you not only received fake inflated grades you "competed" in a school where 50-95% of your classmates were lazy underachievers. You never actually competed.
So of course the kid is a fish out of water academically and gets rattled mentally at a strong college where 95-100% of their peers are aggressive, polished, savvy and over-prepared. Peers just seem to know all the angles and how to play the "game". You feel like an idiot and no, no matter what people claim, you don't "catch up" to them in a year. It's not about being "the best," it's about being nowhere near their polished peers – and these mismatches often don't even show up on high school GPAs or ACT/SAT. So on paper you might not see it, but the differences are stark.
Holy load of arrogant crap. If you did not attend a top prep school or elite magnet program you received fake grades and you never competed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s one reason why top schools look for students that are athletes, artists, etc.
For students that lean on grades only for their self esteem will burn out most at top school because they can handle not being “the best” student.
This is overblown and a myth perpetuated on mommy forums. It's not about being rattled because you're not "the best," it's almost always because the kid received years and years of FAKE GRADES in a non-competitive k-12. And if you did not attend a top prep school or elite magnet program, you not only received fake inflated grades you "competed" in a school where 50-95% of your classmates were lazy underachievers. You never actually competed.
So of course the kid is a fish out of water academically and gets rattled mentally at a strong college where 95-100% of their peers are aggressive, polished, savvy and over-prepared. Peers just seem to know all the angles and how to play the "game". You feel like an idiot and no, no matter what people claim, you don't "catch up" to them in a year. It's not about being "the best," it's about being nowhere near their polished peers – and these mismatches often don't even show up on high school GPAs or ACT/SAT. So on paper you might not see it, but the differences are stark.
Anonymous wrote:I know of several (five) students who got into their first-choice school they'd been aiming for for years, only to drop out and come home at the end of the first year. For some, it was academic troubles, for others it was disappointment in the culture/community/vibe. It's almost as if the school couldn't possibly live up to the expectations they had. In each case it was very traumatic experience or the kids and, frankly, the family who had focused for years on that school as the goal and then it didn't work out.
My daughter is still a freshman, but has her eyes on a particular school and is becoming increasingly fixated on it. I do think she can get in. Any advice on how we can we prevent this sort of flame out if she does attend?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s one reason why top schools look for students that are athletes, artists, etc.
For students that lean on grades only for their self esteem will burn out most at top school because they can handle not being “the best” student.
This is overblown and a myth perpetuated on mommy forums. It's not about being rattled because you're not "the best," it's almost always because the kid received years and years of FAKE GRADES in a non-competitive k-12. And if you did not attend a top prep school or elite magnet program, you not only received fake inflated grades you "competed" in a school where 50-95% of your classmates were lazy underachievers. You never actually competed.
So of course the kid is a fish out of water academically and gets rattled mentally at a strong college where 95-100% of their peers are aggressive, polished, savvy and over-prepared. Peers just seem to know all the angles and how to play the "game". You feel like an idiot and no, no matter what people claim, you don't "catch up" to them in a year. It's not about being "the best," it's about being nowhere near their polished peers – and these mismatches often don't even show up on high school GPAs or ACT/SAT. So on paper you might not see it, but the differences are stark.
Anonymous wrote:Don't have a dream school. Be realistic.
Anonymous wrote:Dream schools, jobs and spouses are a myth. Teach them that there are pros and cons to every place and situation.
Anonymous wrote:Maturity matters a lot. If your kid needs reminders, nagging, guidance on homework or projects in HS, they are already set up for failing out of college. Take a gap year. BTDT.