Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:80% chance he walks. It sounds like he has a bit of money to be able to afford an attorney. He likely already destroyed and disposed of his and her phones a long time ago, so cops wont have that evidence to use. He will claim that she decided to break up with him during the trip and she decided to hitchhike. The van was owned by him, IIRC.

The van will have her DNA all over it, but likely nothing that indicates a crime. He most likely killed her outside the van.

The police will retrace his route by looking at his transactions (he probably didn't pay for gas in cash on a cross country drive) and the mobile phone tower pings. Whenever he shut off the phones, that's likely when she died.

Completely disagree. Not with the insane amount of location and other data available these days. They don’t need her physical phone for that.

And let’s be real. If he just showed up back in town without any kind of excuse, or story of what happened, this guy isn’t exactly playing 3D chess.

DP His story is - she left - end of story.

As for the location pings, if I learned anything from the California couple hiking who died from algae bloom. The national parks and extremely rural areas of America have zero cell service.

All he’d have to do is leave the phone in the area with no cell service or destroy it before he drove back into areas near cell phone towers. And it’s be like he was never there.

if he had his phone with him and he used google maps or even something like komoot for hiking, his phone was still receiving GPS data which is then uploaded to servers ones it gets a connection.

She’s been missing for two weeks and at least 72 hours since her mother filed a critical missing persons report. I’m going to go with - if they haven’t found her by now the cell phone is destroyed and no location data recovered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:80% chance he walks. It sounds like he has a bit of money to be able to afford an attorney. He likely already destroyed and disposed of his and her phones a long time ago, so cops wont have that evidence to use. He will claim that she decided to break up with him during the trip and she decided to hitchhike. The van was owned by him, IIRC.

The van will have her DNA all over it, but likely nothing that indicates a crime. He most likely killed her outside the van.

The police will retrace his route by looking at his transactions (he probably didn't pay for gas in cash on a cross country drive) and the mobile phone tower pings. Whenever he shut off the phones, that's likely when she died.

Completely disagree. Not with the insane amount of location and other data available these days. They don’t need her physical phone for that.

And let’s be real. If he just showed up back in town without any kind of excuse, or story of what happened, this guy isn’t exactly playing 3D chess.

DP His story is - she left - end of story.

As for the location pings, if I learned anything from the California couple hiking who died from algae bloom. The national parks and extremely rural areas of America have zero cell service.

All he’d have to do is leave the phone in the area with no cell service or destroy it before he drove back into areas near cell phone towers. And it’s be like he was never there.

I don’t understand why they don’t just extend cell service to them? These parks sound horrible.

I don’t think you can just extend cell services. Don’t you have to build towers in these forests?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:80% chance he walks. It sounds like he has a bit of money to be able to afford an attorney. He likely already destroyed and disposed of his and her phones a long time ago, so cops wont have that evidence to use. He will claim that she decided to break up with him during the trip and she decided to hitchhike. The van was owned by him, IIRC.

The van will have her DNA all over it, but likely nothing that indicates a crime. He most likely killed her outside the van.

The police will retrace his route by looking at his transactions (he probably didn't pay for gas in cash on a cross country drive) and the mobile phone tower pings. Whenever he shut off the phones, that's likely when she died.

Completely disagree. Not with the insane amount of location and other data available these days. They don’t need her physical phone for that.

And let’s be real. If he just showed up back in town without any kind of excuse, or story of what happened, this guy isn’t exactly playing 3D chess.

DP His story is - she left - end of story.

As for the location pings, if I learned anything from the California couple hiking who died from algae bloom. The national parks and extremely rural areas of America have zero cell service.

All he’d have to do is leave the phone in the area with no cell service or destroy it before he drove back into areas near cell phone towers. And it’s be like he was never there.

I don’t understand why they don’t just extend cell service to them? These parks sound horrible.

I don’t think you can just extend cell services. Don’t you have to build towers in these forests?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:80% chance he walks. It sounds like he has a bit of money to be able to afford an attorney. He likely already destroyed and disposed of his and her phones a long time ago, so cops wont have that evidence to use. He will claim that she decided to break up with him during the trip and she decided to hitchhike. The van was owned by him, IIRC.

The van will have her DNA all over it, but likely nothing that indicates a crime. He most likely killed her outside the van.

The police will retrace his route by looking at his transactions (he probably didn't pay for gas in cash on a cross country drive) and the mobile phone tower pings. Whenever he shut off the phones, that's likely when she died.

Completely disagree. Not with the insane amount of location and other data available these days. They don’t need her physical phone for that.

And let’s be real. If he just showed up back in town without any kind of excuse, or story of what happened, this guy isn’t exactly playing 3D chess.

DP His story is - she left - end of story.

As for the location pings, if I learned anything from the California couple hiking who died from algae bloom. The national parks and extremely rural areas of America have zero cell service.

All he’d have to do is leave the phone in the area with no cell service or destroy it before he drove back into areas near cell phone towers. And it’s be like he was never there.

I don’t understand why they don’t just extend cell service to them? These parks sound horrible.

Anonymous wrote:So many of these threads. I think Jeff needs to create a new section for True Crime or Mysterious Deaths.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:80% chance he walks. It sounds like he has a bit of money to be able to afford an attorney. He likely already destroyed and disposed of his and her phones a long time ago, so cops wont have that evidence to use. He will claim that she decided to break up with him during the trip and she decided to hitchhike. The van was owned by him, IIRC.

The van will have her DNA all over it, but likely nothing that indicates a crime. He most likely killed her outside the van.

The police will retrace his route by looking at his transactions (he probably didn't pay for gas in cash on a cross country drive) and the mobile phone tower pings. Whenever he shut off the phones, that's likely when she died.

Completely disagree. Not with the insane amount of location and other data available these days. They don’t need her physical phone for that.

And let’s be real. If he just showed up back in town without any kind of excuse, or story of what happened, this guy isn’t exactly playing 3D chess.

DP His story is - she left - end of story.

As for the location pings, if I learned anything from the California couple hiking who died from algae bloom. The national parks and extremely rural areas of America have zero cell service.

All he’d have to do is leave the phone in the area with no cell service or destroy it before he drove back into areas near cell phone towers. And it’s be like he was never there.

I don’t understand why they don’t just extend cell service to them? These parks sound horrible.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:80% chance he walks. It sounds like he has a bit of money to be able to afford an attorney. He likely already destroyed and disposed of his and her phones a long time ago, so cops wont have that evidence to use. He will claim that she decided to break up with him during the trip and she decided to hitchhike. The van was owned by him, IIRC.

The van will have her DNA all over it, but likely nothing that indicates a crime. He most likely killed her outside the van.

The police will retrace his route by looking at his transactions (he probably didn't pay for gas in cash on a cross country drive) and the mobile phone tower pings. Whenever he shut off the phones, that's likely when she died.

Completely disagree. Not with the insane amount of location and other data available these days. They don’t need her physical phone for that.

And let’s be real. If he just showed up back in town without any kind of excuse, or story of what happened, this guy isn’t exactly playing 3D chess.

DP His story is - she left - end of story.

As for the location pings, if I learned anything from the California couple hiking who died from algae bloom. The national parks and extremely rural areas of America have zero cell service.

All he’d have to do is leave the phone in the area with no cell service or destroy it before he drove back into areas near cell phone towers. And it’s be like he was never there.

Anonymous wrote:The very likely explanation is he killed her. The only other possibility I can think of is that there was an accident, like an accidental overdose death, and he hid her body and ran because he was afraid of being prosecuted. I hope they recover her soon so her family can get some answers. This is horrible for them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:80% chance he walks. It sounds like he has a bit of money to be able to afford an attorney. He likely already destroyed and disposed of his and her phones a long time ago, so cops wont have that evidence to use. He will claim that she decided to break up with him during the trip and she decided to hitchhike. The van was owned by him, IIRC.

The van will have her DNA all over it, but likely nothing that indicates a crime. He most likely killed her outside the van.

The police will retrace his route by looking at his transactions (he probably didn't pay for gas in cash on a cross country drive) and the mobile phone tower pings. Whenever he shut off the phones, that's likely when she died.

Completely disagree. Not with the insane amount of location and other data available these days. They don’t need her physical phone for that.

And let’s be real. If he just showed up back in town without any kind of excuse, or story of what happened, this guy isn’t exactly playing 3D chess.

DP His story is - she left - end of story.

As for the location pings, if I learned anything from the California couple hiking who died from algae bloom. The national parks and extremely rural areas of America have zero cell service.

All he’d have to do is leave the phone in the area with no cell service or destroy it before he drove back into areas near cell phone towers. And it’s be like he was never there.

if he had his phone with him and he used google maps or even something like komoot for hiking, his phone was still receiving GPS data which is then uploaded to servers ones it gets a connection.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:80% chance he walks. It sounds like he has a bit of money to be able to afford an attorney. He likely already destroyed and disposed of his and her phones a long time ago, so cops wont have that evidence to use. He will claim that she decided to break up with him during the trip and she decided to hitchhike. The van was owned by him, IIRC.

The van will have her DNA all over it, but likely nothing that indicates a crime. He most likely killed her outside the van.

The police will retrace his route by looking at his transactions (he probably didn't pay for gas in cash on a cross country drive) and the mobile phone tower pings. Whenever he shut off the phones, that's likely when she died.

Completely disagree. Not with the insane amount of location and other data available these days. They don’t need her physical phone for that.

And let’s be real. If he just showed up back in town without any kind of excuse, or story of what happened, this guy isn’t exactly playing 3D chess.

DP His story is - she left - end of story.

As for the location pings, if I learned anything from the California couple hiking who died from algae bloom. The national parks and extremely rural areas of America have zero cell service.

All he’d have to do is leave the phone in the area with no cell service or destroy it before he drove back into areas near cell phone towers. And it’s be like he was never there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:80% chance he walks. It sounds like he has a bit of money to be able to afford an attorney. He likely already destroyed and disposed of his and her phones a long time ago, so cops wont have that evidence to use. He will claim that she decided to break up with him during the trip and she decided to hitchhike. The van was owned by him, IIRC.

The van will have her DNA all over it, but likely nothing that indicates a crime. He most likely killed her outside the van.

The police will retrace his route by looking at his transactions (he probably didn't pay for gas in cash on a cross country drive) and the mobile phone tower pings. Whenever he shut off the phones, that's likely when she died.

Completely disagree. Not with the insane amount of location and other data available these days. They don’t need her physical phone for that.

And let’s be real. If he just showed up back in town without any kind of excuse, or story of what happened, this guy isn’t exactly playing 3D chess.

Anonymous wrote:80% chance he walks. It sounds like he has a bit of money to be able to afford an attorney. He likely already destroyed and disposed of his and her phones a long time ago, so cops wont have that evidence to use. He will claim that she decided to break up with him during the trip and she decided to hitchhike. The van was owned by him, IIRC.

The van will have her DNA all over it, but likely nothing that indicates a crime. He most likely killed her outside the van.

The police will retrace his route by looking at his transactions (he probably didn't pay for gas in cash on a cross country drive) and the mobile phone tower pings. Whenever he shut off the phones, that's likely when she died.