Anonymous wrote:I posted earlier today that the killer would probably be intelligent but mentally ill similar to the Unabomber. I bet he ends up being schizophrenic. Our health system probably failed him and our gun laws failed Brian Thompson.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FB page is now gone or private.

They also took him off goodreads. They are trying to wipe his footprint off the internet

But who is doing it? Platforms themselves? His family per his instructions? Or???

And how do you know that?
Wouldn’t the platforms welcome the increased traffic and more ad revenue?
The platforms and websites. To avoid wacko armchair detectives like you. SMH.

Not from the people they want to reach. You think Goodreads wants you screenshotting the reviews written by a murderer and posting them? You find it weirdly fascinating but they don’t. Nope.

Anonymous wrote:I posted earlier today that the killer would probably be intelligent but mentally ill similar to the Unabomber. I bet he ends up being schizophrenic. Our health system probably failed him and our gun laws failed Brian Thompson.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Selecting a jury is going to be tough. Who hasn't had negative experiences with health insurance out there? I wouldn't want to be on that jury.

If it goes to trial and verdict, they'll deliberate in under a day.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel so much empathy for his family. How devastatingly tragic.

Yeah as much as we are celebrating him I would still be devastated if my child threw his life away doing something like this. Odds are he’s getting some prison time and he’ll be sitting in a cell for many years after the news cycle moves on. He is clearly well educated and had someone investing a lot in him. I wish there was another way to overthrow the ruling class without young people feeling this desperate.

That said … for all the other disgruntled people out there who want to kill and be in the news, take note at how glorified this guy is compared to school shooters. If you want to go out in a blaze of glory, this is a better angle than killing kids and teachers, just sayin’.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:FB page is now gone or private.

They also took him off goodreads. They are trying to wipe his footprint off the internet

But who is doing it? Platforms themselves? His family per his instructions? Or???

And how do you know that?
Wouldn’t the platforms welcome the increased traffic and more ad revenue?
The platforms and websites. To avoid wacko armchair detectives like you. SMH.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Good looking solo young men stick out like a sore thumb in the Rust Belt, especially a McDonald’s, which is full of obese poor locals and crippled elderly people.

Yes. It is the world's worst plan to go to a tiny town like that where all the locals know each other. Makes zero sense.

The idiocy of what he did is so dumb it must have been intentional. Why the elaborate plan to get out of NYC and then that's all he had? Seems like he wanted to get caught.

Anonymous wrote:I feel so much empathy for his family. How devastatingly tragic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My guess is that The Back surgery lead to opioid abuse, which then led to use of psychedelics and harder stuff.

Here come the excuses because it’s a rich white guy.

He’s not really white. My guess is his roots are in southern Italy with North African genes somewhere in his family tree.

Italians are white.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What the heck is an “ex Ivy Leaguer”??? He’s an alumnus or a graduate. Ex?

Not if he dropped out.

You're never an ex student. You're a former, you're an alumnus, you're a graduate. Why was "ex" Ivy League student put in every headline and viral tweet?

I assume that it’s because they can’t confirm that he graduated.

It’s because they can’t write. Confirming his degrees is simple. Or it was a few hours ago. Now you’d have to work a little harder but still doable.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This trial is going to be a circus.

He’s going to take a plea.

Yeah no way this goes to trial unless he pleads insanity and even then very good chance of a plea.

Crime is on video, footage of him at Starbucks, and they found the gun and the fake idea he used to check into the NYC hostel PLUS a 3-page "manifesto" that will show motive, on him in Altoona.

He's cooked.

Probably, but that also means they don't need to offer him anything. Posters here may have fanciful ideas about jury nullification, but there's no way a jury doesn't convict on first degree murder here.

Yeah?

If I’m on that jury, I’ll hold out until it hangs. I don’t care what they say, I just won’t convict. Period.

Now, there’s plenty of people out there like me.

Are you willing to commit perjury to get on the jury in the first place? Because it will require that.

Sure. Prove I perjured myself. You cannot.

You’re right. But having picked about 15 criminal juries, I’ve looked a lot of potential jurors in the eye. People have a much harder time lying when they’re standing alone in front of a judge, a prosecutor, and a defense attorney than you might think.

How is it lying to vote that you’re not convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that he’s guilty?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This trial is going to be a circus.

He’s going to take a plea.

Yeah no way this goes to trial unless he pleads insanity and even then very good chance of a plea.

Crime is on video, footage of him at Starbucks, and they found the gun and the fake idea he used to check into the NYC hostel PLUS a 3-page "manifesto" that will show motive, on him in Altoona.

He's cooked.

Probably, but that also means they don't need to offer him anything. Posters here may have fanciful ideas about jury nullification, but there's no way a jury doesn't convict on first degree murder here.

Yeah?

If I’m on that jury, I’ll hold out until it hangs. I don’t care what they say, I just won’t convict. Period.

Now, there’s plenty of people out there like me.

There were 2 jurors on a trial I served on who said nothing would change their minds to convict, unless they’d been standing there. A lot of people who say what pp above you did haven’t ever served on a jury, or it was a cut and dry case.

This will be the Gen Z OJ Simpson case. He has a massive amount of fangirls right now.