RIP

Anonymous wrote:"Normal" people don't care about this... except for entire towns like Kane, PA.

Capitol riot arrest of restaurant owner rattles hometown
https://apnews.com/article/entertainment-joe-biden-government-and-politics-arrests-coronavirus-pandemic-9d89bbfa350150ae0c07822412b013c3

“Standing up for her rights.” These people are jaw-droppingly oblivious.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:In which Rep. Taylor Greene thinks that Pelosi should have known on the 5th about the bombs that were placed on the 5th but not discovered by USCP until the 6th. Did…did MTG know about the bombs on the 5th? 🤔

She also thinks Pelosi is in charge of the DC National Guard, when it was Trump. 🤡

Such an idiot. Doesn't seem that the most guilty are speaking the loudest about this inquiry. Where is bobbette? We know she's got blood on her hands too but she has been very, very quiet.

A friend with a greater than room temperature IQ probably told her to shut her mouth.

Anonymous wrote:In which Rep. Taylor Greene thinks that Pelosi should have known on the 5th about the bombs that were placed on the 5th but not discovered by USCP until the 6th. Did…did MTG know about the bombs on the 5th? 🤔

She also thinks Pelosi is in charge of the DC National Guard, when it was Trump. 🤡

Such an idiot. Doesn't seem that the most guilty are speaking the loudest about this inquiry. Where is bobbette? We know she's got blood on her hands too but she has been very, very quiet.

In which Rep. Taylor Greene thinks that Pelosi should have known on the 5th about the bombs that were placed on the 5th but not discovered by USCP until the 6th. Did…did MTG know about the bombs on the 5th? 🤔

She also thinks Pelosi is in charge of the DC National Guard, when it was Trump. 🤡

"Normal" people don't care about this... except for entire towns like Kane, PA.

Capitol riot arrest of restaurant owner rattles hometown
https://apnews.com/article/entertainment-joe-biden-government-and-politics-arrests-coronavirus-pandemic-9d89bbfa350150ae0c07822412b013c3

🧐

“As for the attacked officer: “He was doing nothing other than his job — a job that Mr. Webster himself did for years,” said Judge Amit P. Mehta of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, during the hearing in late June. “It’s really quite something. You want to talk about some of the worst behavior, some of the most horrific conduct someone has engaged in, it’s there on video.”

Mr. Webster is one of several current or former law enforcement officers charged in the riot, a subset that surprised Capitol officers.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/27/nyregion/capitol-riot-january-6.html

Double whammy of a day for Rep. Mo Brooks (Q-AL)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude. It’s right there. It doesn’t say anything about the son. It’s in the charges.
Also: all because they didn’t TAKE GUNS AWAY doesn’t mean there weren’t guns.

It's NOT in the affidavit and the charges are reiterated by PBS and CNN. That doesn't mean those WERE the charges. The actual charges would be in the court documents. Someone posted the affidavit from the FBI agent and the only mention of a gun was what the son said the guy told him.

The FBI specifically told Congress there were no guns on 1/6 confiscated.

Regarding the bolded, I do think if they found guns on the perps they would actually disarm them

Reffitt has stated multiple times that he had a gun with him in the Capitol. The Government has recordings of him telling his son he was armed, and a recording of a Jan 10 Zoom call

involving Reffitt and two other Three Percenters. In it, Reffitt allegedly said he helped lead the charge on the Capitol with a .40-caliber pistol at his side, at one point telling a U.S. Capitol Police officer who was firing nonlethal rounds at him, “Sorry, darling. You better get a bigger damn gun.”

https://www.propublica.org/article/in-exclusive-jailhouse-letter-capital-riot-defendant-explains-motives-remains-boastful

No, the gun wasn't confiscated on Jan 6, because, like the vast majority of the insurrectionists, Reffitt wasn't arrested on Jan. 6.

So they plan to prove he was carrying a gun on him on Jan 6th because of words. OK then

When the words are a confession, they’re taken very seriously by law enforcement.

They also have the guy’s own gopro video from the incident.

Republicans have very much taken the “who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes” approach to the consequences of their insurrection.

“Fascists attack the truth, because truth is essential to a free democracy.”

Anonymous wrote:”ProPublica has obtained new details about the Trump White House’s knowledge of the gathering storm, after interviewing more than 50 people involved in the events of Jan. 6 and reviewing months of private correspondence. Taken together, these accounts suggest that senior Trump aides had been warned the Jan. 6 events could turn chaotic, with tens of thousands of people potentially overwhelming ill-prepared law enforcement officials.

Rather than trying to halt the march, Trump and his allies accommodated its leaders, according to text messages and interviews with Republican operatives and officials.”

Warned? they instigated and propagated it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude. It’s right there. It doesn’t say anything about the son. It’s in the charges.
Also: all because they didn’t TAKE GUNS AWAY doesn’t mean there weren’t guns.

It's NOT in the affidavit and the charges are reiterated by PBS and CNN. That doesn't mean those WERE the charges. The actual charges would be in the court documents. Someone posted the affidavit from the FBI agent and the only mention of a gun was what the son said the guy told him.

The FBI specifically told Congress there were no guns on 1/6 confiscated.

Regarding the bolded, I do think if they found guns on the perps they would actually disarm them

Reffitt has stated multiple times that he had a gun with him in the Capitol. The Government has recordings of him telling his son he was armed, and a recording of a Jan 10 Zoom call

involving Reffitt and two other Three Percenters. In it, Reffitt allegedly said he helped lead the charge on the Capitol with a .40-caliber pistol at his side, at one point telling a U.S. Capitol Police officer who was firing nonlethal rounds at him, “Sorry, darling. You better get a bigger damn gun.”

https://www.propublica.org/article/in-exclusive-jailhouse-letter-capital-riot-defendant-explains-motives-remains-boastful

No, the gun wasn't confiscated on Jan 6, because, like the vast majority of the insurrectionists, Reffitt wasn't arrested on Jan. 6.

So they plan to prove he was carrying a gun on him on Jan 6th because of words. OK then

When the words are a confession, they’re taken very seriously by law enforcement.

They also have the guy’s own gopro video from the incident.

Republicans have very much taken the “who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes” approach to the consequences of their insurrection.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude. It’s right there. It doesn’t say anything about the son. It’s in the charges.
Also: all because they didn’t TAKE GUNS AWAY doesn’t mean there weren’t guns.

It's NOT in the affidavit and the charges are reiterated by PBS and CNN. That doesn't mean those WERE the charges. The actual charges would be in the court documents. Someone posted the affidavit from the FBI agent and the only mention of a gun was what the son said the guy told him.

The FBI specifically told Congress there were no guns on 1/6 confiscated.

Regarding the bolded, I do think if they found guns on the perps they would actually disarm them

Reffitt has stated multiple times that he had a gun with him in the Capitol. The Government has recordings of him telling his son he was armed, and a recording of a Jan 10 Zoom call

involving Reffitt and two other Three Percenters. In it, Reffitt allegedly said he helped lead the charge on the Capitol with a .40-caliber pistol at his side, at one point telling a U.S. Capitol Police officer who was firing nonlethal rounds at him, “Sorry, darling. You better get a bigger damn gun.”

https://www.propublica.org/article/in-exclusive-jailhouse-letter-capital-riot-defendant-explains-motives-remains-boastful

No, the gun wasn't confiscated on Jan 6, because, like the vast majority of the insurrectionists, Reffitt wasn't arrested on Jan. 6.

So they plan to prove he was carrying a gun on him on Jan 6th because of words. OK then

When the words are a confession, they’re taken very seriously by law enforcement.

They also have the guy’s own gopro video from the incident.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dude. It’s right there. It doesn’t say anything about the son. It’s in the charges.
Also: all because they didn’t TAKE GUNS AWAY doesn’t mean there weren’t guns.

It's NOT in the affidavit and the charges are reiterated by PBS and CNN. That doesn't mean those WERE the charges. The actual charges would be in the court documents. Someone posted the affidavit from the FBI agent and the only mention of a gun was what the son said the guy told him.

The FBI specifically told Congress there were no guns on 1/6 confiscated.

Regarding the bolded, I do think if they found guns on the perps they would actually disarm them

Reffitt has stated multiple times that he had a gun with him in the Capitol. The Government has recordings of him telling his son he was armed, and a recording of a Jan 10 Zoom call

involving Reffitt and two other Three Percenters. In it, Reffitt allegedly said he helped lead the charge on the Capitol with a .40-caliber pistol at his side, at one point telling a U.S. Capitol Police officer who was firing nonlethal rounds at him, “Sorry, darling. You better get a bigger damn gun.”

https://www.propublica.org/article/in-exclusive-jailhouse-letter-capital-riot-defendant-explains-motives-remains-boastful

No, the gun wasn't confiscated on Jan 6, because, like the vast majority of the insurrectionists, Reffitt wasn't arrested on Jan. 6.

So they plan to prove he was carrying a gun on him on Jan 6th because of words. OK then

When the words are a confession, they’re taken very seriously by law enforcement.

”ProPublica has obtained new details about the Trump White House’s knowledge of the gathering storm, after interviewing more than 50 people involved in the events of Jan. 6 and reviewing months of private correspondence. Taken together, these accounts suggest that senior Trump aides had been warned the Jan. 6 events could turn chaotic, with tens of thousands of people potentially overwhelming ill-prepared law enforcement officials.

Rather than trying to halt the march, Trump and his allies accommodated its leaders, according to text messages and interviews with Republican operatives and officials.”