Anonymous wrote:

So 125 million barrels? Operation freedom started May 4. That is 3 million barrels a day or 2 tankers. Before the war it was 20 million barrels a day. This seems to be the tankers that paid the Iranians or Iran oil tankers. The US is totally at the mercy of Iran.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Veteran journalist David Shuster laid out the reported terms of the emerging U.S.-Iran agreement in blunt detail and called it a surrender. Under terms circulated by Iranian state media, the U.S. would withdraw all forces from the Persian Gulf, lift sanctions, release $12 billion immediately and another $12 billion within 60 days, fund $300 billion in Iranian reconstruction, and cede control of the Strait of Hormuz to Tehran. In return, the U.S. receives Iran's promise to discuss its nuclear program, a commitment Shuster said does not constitute a deal.

Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate. The US is not giving Iran 300 billion dollars of American money. Yeah, Iran can have their own 30 billion confiscated dollars, but where is the 300 billion coming from? And no, the US is not pulling out of the UAE, Kuwait, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq, and Bahrain. No way. And where are the terms for Israel to stop bombing and annexing Lebanon to become the greater northern Israel. This agreement doesn’t sound right and there’s nothing in it for the USA.

What is your point?

Obama didn’t “give” Iran money (he unfroze some of the Iranian deposits in U.S.-controlled institutions and permitted them to retrieve it), but the Republicans have lived and breathed on the lie of “pallets of cash sent to Iran” for over a decade now.

Obama's name is not used once in my post, so stop being so reactionary without cause. Learn to read to comprehend and not respond.

You are clearly trying to refute points critical of this administration’s planned transfer of funds to Iran, and clearly (yet futilely) attempting to use language intended to differentiate this admin.’s plan from THE FALSE CLAIMS of what occurred under Obama.

Shove the gaslighting where the sun don’t shine. Not having it.

#benghazi! #lockherup! #pallets of cash!

Lamest, most inept hypocrites imaginable …

Delulu. How is stating Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate." trying to refute points in support of Trump. You are obviously a troll. And no, the US government can only give Iran the 30 billion dollars that the US government is holding. No, Trump is not giving Iran 300 billion American dollars. First, he doesn't have the authority, only Congress. Second, even the feckless Congress won't give him $300 billion to give to Iran. Where do you think those sixty votes are going to come from? I don't even think, "truly concerning" Collins would vote to give Iran $300 billion American dollars. Yeah, you are a troll.

Trump and SCOTUS have set the precedent that all a president has to do issue an EO and the 300 billion will be paid.

Now Trump could take it to Congress and Congress will approve it. Congress just approved giving Israel access to all our technology, intelligence networks, top secret programs, etc with nothing in return. Congress has also given Israel a blank check for US military weapon systems at the expense of our troops and will Congress approve the Trump’s slush fund and exception from taxes for Trump and his family. Congress will do whatever Trump wants.

This is a done deal. Iranians will be getting the 24 billion frozen assets and 300 billion to rebuild. All that will be paid in advance of any opening of the strait. This is the MOU that is being signed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Veteran journalist David Shuster laid out the reported terms of the emerging U.S.-Iran agreement in blunt detail and called it a surrender. Under terms circulated by Iranian state media, the U.S. would withdraw all forces from the Persian Gulf, lift sanctions, release $12 billion immediately and another $12 billion within 60 days, fund $300 billion in Iranian reconstruction, and cede control of the Strait of Hormuz to Tehran. In return, the U.S. receives Iran's promise to discuss its nuclear program, a commitment Shuster said does not constitute a deal.

Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate. The US is not giving Iran 300 billion dollars of American money. Yeah, Iran can have their own 30 billion confiscated dollars, but where is the 300 billion coming from? And no, the US is not pulling out of the UAE, Kuwait, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq, and Bahrain. No way. And where are the terms for Israel to stop bombing and annexing Lebanon to become the greater northern Israel. This agreement doesn’t sound right and there’s nothing in it for the USA.

What is your point?

Obama didn’t “give” Iran money (he unfroze some of the Iranian deposits in U.S.-controlled institutions and permitted them to retrieve it), but the Republicans have lived and breathed on the lie of “pallets of cash sent to Iran” for over a decade now.

Obama's name is not used once in my post, so stop being so reactionary without cause. Learn to read to comprehend and not respond.

You are clearly trying to refute points critical of this administration’s planned transfer of funds to Iran, and clearly (yet futilely) attempting to use language intended to differentiate this admin.’s plan from THE FALSE CLAIMS of what occurred under Obama.

Shove the gaslighting where the sun don’t shine. Not having it.

#benghazi! #lockherup! #pallets of cash!

Lamest, most inept hypocrites imaginable …

Delulu. How is stating Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate." trying to refute points in support of Trump. You are obviously a troll. And no, the US government can only give Iran the 30 billion dollars that the US government is holding. No, Trump is not giving Iran 300 billion American dollars. First, he doesn't have the authority, only Congress. Second, even the feckless Congress won't give him $300 billion to give to Iran. Where do you think those sixty votes are going to come from? I don't even think, "truly concerning" Collins would vote to give Iran $300 billion American dollars. Yeah, you are a troll.

Also, you better wake up at some point and learn the harsh truth that our government no longer plays by any rules. It’s hysterical that you think anyone in the government can or would stop the transfer of billions of U.S. taxpayer funds to Iran … did you miss the Board of Peace commitment of $10,000,000,000.00 (that’s billion with a “B”)? When did Congress approve that?

Yeah. Exactly. This is bread and circuses time for MAGA, buddy. Time to wake up.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Veteran journalist David Shuster laid out the reported terms of the emerging U.S.-Iran agreement in blunt detail and called it a surrender. Under terms circulated by Iranian state media, the U.S. would withdraw all forces from the Persian Gulf, lift sanctions, release $12 billion immediately and another $12 billion within 60 days, fund $300 billion in Iranian reconstruction, and cede control of the Strait of Hormuz to Tehran. In return, the U.S. receives Iran's promise to discuss its nuclear program, a commitment Shuster said does not constitute a deal.

Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate. The US is not giving Iran 300 billion dollars of American money. Yeah, Iran can have their own 30 billion confiscated dollars, but where is the 300 billion coming from? And no, the US is not pulling out of the UAE, Kuwait, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq, and Bahrain. No way. And where are the terms for Israel to stop bombing and annexing Lebanon to become the greater northern Israel. This agreement doesn’t sound right and there’s nothing in it for the USA.

What is your point?

Obama didn’t “give” Iran money (he unfroze some of the Iranian deposits in U.S.-controlled institutions and permitted them to retrieve it), but the Republicans have lived and breathed on the lie of “pallets of cash sent to Iran” for over a decade now.

Obama's name is not used once in my post, so stop being so reactionary without cause. Learn to read to comprehend and not respond.

You are clearly trying to refute points critical of this administration’s planned transfer of funds to Iran, and clearly (yet futilely) attempting to use language intended to differentiate this admin.’s plan from THE FALSE CLAIMS of what occurred under Obama.

Shove the gaslighting where the sun don’t shine. Not having it.

#benghazi! #lockherup! #pallets of cash!

Lamest, most inept hypocrites imaginable …

Liar. Just stop. I most certainly was not. Again, read for comprehension and not to respond.

Cool, so we agree …

1. The Obama admin. “gave” Iran nothing …

2. The Obama admin. allowed Iran to retrieve some amount of THEIR OWN DEPOSITS that had been frozen by the U.S. (likely in violation of int’l law)

3. Whatever the amount was under #2 above, all indications are that the current Trump admin. will be allowing Iran to retrieve substantially more of THEIR OWN DEPOSITS; and that the current Trump admin. will ALSO be transferring an amount of OUR U.S. FUNDS to Iran, an amount of which will dwarf whatever the amount was in #2 above.

Bad time to be a Republican if “owning the libs” is a priority …

$400 million uner the JCPOA

at least 30 billion plus another 250-300 billion in "reconstruction"

PLUS lifting of sanctions
PLUS Iran can now charge for services (toll) for the Straits.

utter disaster for the GOP

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Veteran journalist David Shuster laid out the reported terms of the emerging U.S.-Iran agreement in blunt detail and called it a surrender. Under terms circulated by Iranian state media, the U.S. would withdraw all forces from the Persian Gulf, lift sanctions, release $12 billion immediately and another $12 billion within 60 days, fund $300 billion in Iranian reconstruction, and cede control of the Strait of Hormuz to Tehran. In return, the U.S. receives Iran's promise to discuss its nuclear program, a commitment Shuster said does not constitute a deal.

Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate. The US is not giving Iran 300 billion dollars of American money. Yeah, Iran can have their own 30 billion confiscated dollars, but where is the 300 billion coming from? And no, the US is not pulling out of the UAE, Kuwait, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq, and Bahrain. No way. And where are the terms for Israel to stop bombing and annexing Lebanon to become the greater northern Israel. This agreement doesn’t sound right and there’s nothing in it for the USA.

What is your point?

Obama didn’t “give” Iran money (he unfroze some of the Iranian deposits in U.S.-controlled institutions and permitted them to retrieve it), but the Republicans have lived and breathed on the lie of “pallets of cash sent to Iran” for over a decade now.

Obama's name is not used once in my post, so stop being so reactionary without cause. Learn to read to comprehend and not respond.

You are clearly trying to refute points critical of this administration’s planned transfer of funds to Iran, and clearly (yet futilely) attempting to use language intended to differentiate this admin.’s plan from THE FALSE CLAIMS of what occurred under Obama.

Shove the gaslighting where the sun don’t shine. Not having it.

#benghazi! #lockherup! #pallets of cash!

Lamest, most inept hypocrites imaginable …

Delulu. How is stating Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate." trying to refute points in support of Trump. You are obviously a troll. And no, the US government can only give Iran the 30 billion dollars that the US government is holding. No, Trump is not giving Iran 300 billion American dollars. First, he doesn't have the authority, only Congress. Second, even the feckless Congress won't give him $300 billion to give to Iran. Where do you think those sixty votes are going to come from? I don't even think, "truly concerning" Collins would vote to give Iran $300 billion American dollars. Yeah, you are a troll.

Says the mouthbreather whose life’s dream is to “own the libs”.

Seek mental help

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Veteran journalist David Shuster laid out the reported terms of the emerging U.S.-Iran agreement in blunt detail and called it a surrender. Under terms circulated by Iranian state media, the U.S. would withdraw all forces from the Persian Gulf, lift sanctions, release $12 billion immediately and another $12 billion within 60 days, fund $300 billion in Iranian reconstruction, and cede control of the Strait of Hormuz to Tehran. In return, the U.S. receives Iran's promise to discuss its nuclear program, a commitment Shuster said does not constitute a deal.

Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate. The US is not giving Iran 300 billion dollars of American money. Yeah, Iran can have their own 30 billion confiscated dollars, but where is the 300 billion coming from? And no, the US is not pulling out of the UAE, Kuwait, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq, and Bahrain. No way. And where are the terms for Israel to stop bombing and annexing Lebanon to become the greater northern Israel. This agreement doesn’t sound right and there’s nothing in it for the USA.

What is your point?

Obama didn’t “give” Iran money (he unfroze some of the Iranian deposits in U.S.-controlled institutions and permitted them to retrieve it), but the Republicans have lived and breathed on the lie of “pallets of cash sent to Iran” for over a decade now.

Obama's name is not used once in my post, so stop being so reactionary without cause. Learn to read to comprehend and not respond.

You are clearly trying to refute points critical of this administration’s planned transfer of funds to Iran, and clearly (yet futilely) attempting to use language intended to differentiate this admin.’s plan from THE FALSE CLAIMS of what occurred under Obama.

Shove the gaslighting where the sun don’t shine. Not having it.

#benghazi! #lockherup! #pallets of cash!

Lamest, most inept hypocrites imaginable …

Liar. Just stop. I most certainly was not. Again, read for comprehension and not to respond.

Cool, so we agree …

1. The Obama admin. “gave” Iran nothing …

2. The Obama admin. allowed Iran to retrieve some amount of THEIR OWN DEPOSITS that had been frozen by the U.S. (likely in violation of int’l law)

3. Whatever the amount was under #2 above, all indications are that the current Trump admin. will be allowing Iran to retrieve substantially more of THEIR OWN DEPOSITS; and that the current Trump admin. will ALSO be transferring an amount of OUR U.S. FUNDS to Iran, an amount of which will dwarf whatever the amount was in #2 above.

Bad time to be a Republican if “owning the libs” is a priority …

Again, Obama's name was never used or implied. That's all you. I am through engaging with dishonest people who make up stuff that was never said or implied to fit their narrative. It's like people cannot have a conversation without bringing up Biden or Obama when discussing the current president's bad acts.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Veteran journalist David Shuster laid out the reported terms of the emerging U.S.-Iran agreement in blunt detail and called it a surrender. Under terms circulated by Iranian state media, the U.S. would withdraw all forces from the Persian Gulf, lift sanctions, release $12 billion immediately and another $12 billion within 60 days, fund $300 billion in Iranian reconstruction, and cede control of the Strait of Hormuz to Tehran. In return, the U.S. receives Iran's promise to discuss its nuclear program, a commitment Shuster said does not constitute a deal.

Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate. The US is not giving Iran 300 billion dollars of American money. Yeah, Iran can have their own 30 billion confiscated dollars, but where is the 300 billion coming from? And no, the US is not pulling out of the UAE, Kuwait, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq, and Bahrain. No way. And where are the terms for Israel to stop bombing and annexing Lebanon to become the greater northern Israel. This agreement doesn’t sound right and there’s nothing in it for the USA.

What is your point?

Obama didn’t “give” Iran money (he unfroze some of the Iranian deposits in U.S.-controlled institutions and permitted them to retrieve it), but the Republicans have lived and breathed on the lie of “pallets of cash sent to Iran” for over a decade now.

Obama's name is not used once in my post, so stop being so reactionary without cause. Learn to read to comprehend and not respond.

You are clearly trying to refute points critical of this administration’s planned transfer of funds to Iran, and clearly (yet futilely) attempting to use language intended to differentiate this admin.’s plan from THE FALSE CLAIMS of what occurred under Obama.

Shove the gaslighting where the sun don’t shine. Not having it.

#benghazi! #lockherup! #pallets of cash!

Lamest, most inept hypocrites imaginable …

Delulu. How is stating Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate." trying to refute points in support of Trump. You are obviously a troll. And no, the US government can only give Iran the 30 billion dollars that the US government is holding. No, Trump is not giving Iran 300 billion American dollars. First, he doesn't have the authority, only Congress. Second, even the feckless Congress won't give him $300 billion to give to Iran. Where do you think those sixty votes are going to come from? I don't even think, "truly concerning" Collins would vote to give Iran $300 billion American dollars. Yeah, you are a troll.

Says the mouthbreather whose life’s dream is to “own the libs”.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Veteran journalist David Shuster laid out the reported terms of the emerging U.S.-Iran agreement in blunt detail and called it a surrender. Under terms circulated by Iranian state media, the U.S. would withdraw all forces from the Persian Gulf, lift sanctions, release $12 billion immediately and another $12 billion within 60 days, fund $300 billion in Iranian reconstruction, and cede control of the Strait of Hormuz to Tehran. In return, the U.S. receives Iran's promise to discuss its nuclear program, a commitment Shuster said does not constitute a deal.

Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate. The US is not giving Iran 300 billion dollars of American money. Yeah, Iran can have their own 30 billion confiscated dollars, but where is the 300 billion coming from? And no, the US is not pulling out of the UAE, Kuwait, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq, and Bahrain. No way. And where are the terms for Israel to stop bombing and annexing Lebanon to become the greater northern Israel. This agreement doesn’t sound right and there’s nothing in it for the USA.

What is your point?

Obama didn’t “give” Iran money (he unfroze some of the Iranian deposits in U.S.-controlled institutions and permitted them to retrieve it), but the Republicans have lived and breathed on the lie of “pallets of cash sent to Iran” for over a decade now.

Obama's name is not used once in my post, so stop being so reactionary without cause. Learn to read to comprehend and not respond.

You are clearly trying to refute points critical of this administration’s planned transfer of funds to Iran, and clearly (yet futilely) attempting to use language intended to differentiate this admin.’s plan from THE FALSE CLAIMS of what occurred under Obama.

Shove the gaslighting where the sun don’t shine. Not having it.

#benghazi! #lockherup! #pallets of cash!

Lamest, most inept hypocrites imaginable …

Liar. Just stop. I most certainly was not. Again, read for comprehension and not to respond.

Cool, so we agree …

1. The Obama admin. “gave” Iran nothing …

2. The Obama admin. allowed Iran to retrieve some amount of THEIR OWN DEPOSITS that had been frozen by the U.S. (likely in violation of int’l law)

3. Whatever the amount was under #2 above, all indications are that the current Trump admin. will be allowing Iran to retrieve substantially more of THEIR OWN DEPOSITS; and that the current Trump admin. will ALSO be transferring an amount of OUR U.S. FUNDS to Iran, an amount of which will dwarf whatever the amount was in #2 above.

Bad time to be a Republican if “owning the libs” is a priority …

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Veteran journalist David Shuster laid out the reported terms of the emerging U.S.-Iran agreement in blunt detail and called it a surrender. Under terms circulated by Iranian state media, the U.S. would withdraw all forces from the Persian Gulf, lift sanctions, release $12 billion immediately and another $12 billion within 60 days, fund $300 billion in Iranian reconstruction, and cede control of the Strait of Hormuz to Tehran. In return, the U.S. receives Iran's promise to discuss its nuclear program, a commitment Shuster said does not constitute a deal.

Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate. The US is not giving Iran 300 billion dollars of American money. Yeah, Iran can have their own 30 billion confiscated dollars, but where is the 300 billion coming from? And no, the US is not pulling out of the UAE, Kuwait, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq, and Bahrain. No way. And where are the terms for Israel to stop bombing and annexing Lebanon to become the greater northern Israel. This agreement doesn’t sound right and there’s nothing in it for the USA.

What is your point?

Obama didn’t “give” Iran money (he unfroze some of the Iranian deposits in U.S.-controlled institutions and permitted them to retrieve it), but the Republicans have lived and breathed on the lie of “pallets of cash sent to Iran” for over a decade now.

Obama's name is not used once in my post, so stop being so reactionary without cause. Learn to read to comprehend and not respond.

You are clearly trying to refute points critical of this administration’s planned transfer of funds to Iran, and clearly (yet futilely) attempting to use language intended to differentiate this admin.’s plan from THE FALSE CLAIMS of what occurred under Obama.

Shove the gaslighting where the sun don’t shine. Not having it.

#benghazi! #lockherup! #pallets of cash!

Lamest, most inept hypocrites imaginable …

Delulu. How is stating Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate." trying to refute points in support of Trump. You are obviously a troll. And no, the US government can only give Iran the 30 billion dollars that the US government is holding. No, Trump is not giving Iran 300 billion American dollars. First, he doesn't have the authority, only Congress. Second, even the feckless Congress won't give him $300 billion to give to Iran. Where do you think those sixty votes are going to come from? I don't even think, "truly concerning" Collins would vote to give Iran $300 billion American dollars. Yeah, you are a troll.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Veteran journalist David Shuster laid out the reported terms of the emerging U.S.-Iran agreement in blunt detail and called it a surrender. Under terms circulated by Iranian state media, the U.S. would withdraw all forces from the Persian Gulf, lift sanctions, release $12 billion immediately and another $12 billion within 60 days, fund $300 billion in Iranian reconstruction, and cede control of the Strait of Hormuz to Tehran. In return, the U.S. receives Iran's promise to discuss its nuclear program, a commitment Shuster said does not constitute a deal.

Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate. The US is not giving Iran 300 billion dollars of American money. Yeah, Iran can have their own 30 billion confiscated dollars, but where is the 300 billion coming from? And no, the US is not pulling out of the UAE, Kuwait, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq, and Bahrain. No way. And where are the terms for Israel to stop bombing and annexing Lebanon to become the greater northern Israel. This agreement doesn’t sound right and there’s nothing in it for the USA.

What is your point?

Obama didn’t “give” Iran money (he unfroze some of the Iranian deposits in U.S.-controlled institutions and permitted them to retrieve it), but the Republicans have lived and breathed on the lie of “pallets of cash sent to Iran” for over a decade now.

Obama's name is not used once in my post, so stop being so reactionary without cause. Learn to read to comprehend and not respond.

You are clearly trying to refute points critical of this administration’s planned transfer of funds to Iran, and clearly (yet futilely) attempting to use language intended to differentiate this admin.’s plan from THE FALSE CLAIMS of what occurred under Obama.

Shove the gaslighting where the sun don’t shine. Not having it.

#benghazi! #lockherup! #pallets of cash!

Lamest, most inept hypocrites imaginable …

Liar. Just stop. I most certainly was not. Again, read for comprehension and not to respond.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Veteran journalist David Shuster laid out the reported terms of the emerging U.S.-Iran agreement in blunt detail and called it a surrender. Under terms circulated by Iranian state media, the U.S. would withdraw all forces from the Persian Gulf, lift sanctions, release $12 billion immediately and another $12 billion within 60 days, fund $300 billion in Iranian reconstruction, and cede control of the Strait of Hormuz to Tehran. In return, the U.S. receives Iran's promise to discuss its nuclear program, a commitment Shuster said does not constitute a deal.

Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate. The US is not giving Iran 300 billion dollars of American money. Yeah, Iran can have their own 30 billion confiscated dollars, but where is the 300 billion coming from? And no, the US is not pulling out of the UAE, Kuwait, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq, and Bahrain. No way. And where are the terms for Israel to stop bombing and annexing Lebanon to become the greater northern Israel. This agreement doesn’t sound right and there’s nothing in it for the USA.

What is your point?

Obama didn’t “give” Iran money (he unfroze some of the Iranian deposits in U.S.-controlled institutions and permitted them to retrieve it), but the Republicans have lived and breathed on the lie of “pallets of cash sent to Iran” for over a decade now.

Obama's name is not used once in my post, so stop being so reactionary without cause. Learn to read to comprehend and not respond.

You are clearly trying to refute points critical of this administration’s planned transfer of funds to Iran, and clearly (yet futilely) attempting to use language intended to differentiate this admin.’s plan from THE FALSE CLAIMS of what occurred under Obama.

Shove the gaslighting where the sun don’t shine. Not having it.

#benghazi! #lockherup! #pallets of cash!

Lamest, most inept hypocrites imaginable …

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Veteran journalist David Shuster laid out the reported terms of the emerging U.S.-Iran agreement in blunt detail and called it a surrender. Under terms circulated by Iranian state media, the U.S. would withdraw all forces from the Persian Gulf, lift sanctions, release $12 billion immediately and another $12 billion within 60 days, fund $300 billion in Iranian reconstruction, and cede control of the Strait of Hormuz to Tehran. In return, the U.S. receives Iran's promise to discuss its nuclear program, a commitment Shuster said does not constitute a deal.

Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate. The US is not giving Iran 300 billion dollars of American money. Yeah, Iran can have their own 30 billion confiscated dollars, but where is the 300 billion coming from? And no, the US is not pulling out of the UAE, Kuwait, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq, and Bahrain. No way. And where are the terms for Israel to stop bombing and annexing Lebanon to become the greater northern Israel. This agreement doesn’t sound right and there’s nothing in it for the USA.

What is your point?

Obama didn’t “give” Iran money (he unfroze some of the Iranian deposits in U.S.-controlled institutions and permitted them to retrieve it), but the Republicans have lived and breathed on the lie of “pallets of cash sent to Iran” for over a decade now.

Obama's name is not used once in my post, so stop being so reactionary without cause. Learn to read to comprehend and not respond.

Anonymous wrote:Israel has struck Beirut today, so no Iran deal today. Iran said "nope". Yall called it. Posters kept saying that Israel was going to do something to tank the deal.

Oh look at that, the evil Islamic terrorist empire of Iran consistently is supporting Gaza and Lebanon while liberal western democracies, the shining beacon of morality and goodness continues to send weapons and money to the genociders. Almost like we've been lied to our whole lives or something.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Veteran journalist David Shuster laid out the reported terms of the emerging U.S.-Iran agreement in blunt detail and called it a surrender. Under terms circulated by Iranian state media, the U.S. would withdraw all forces from the Persian Gulf, lift sanctions, release $12 billion immediately and another $12 billion within 60 days, fund $300 billion in Iranian reconstruction, and cede control of the Strait of Hormuz to Tehran. In return, the U.S. receives Iran's promise to discuss its nuclear program, a commitment Shuster said does not constitute a deal.

Trump is desperate to extricate himself from this quagmire, but I don’t think even his demented, narcissistic self is this desperate. The US is not giving Iran 300 billion dollars of American money. Yeah, Iran can have their own 30 billion confiscated dollars, but where is the 300 billion coming from? And no, the US is not pulling out of the UAE, Kuwait, Jordan, Qatar, Iraq, and Bahrain. No way. And where are the terms for Israel to stop bombing and annexing Lebanon to become the greater northern Israel. This agreement doesn’t sound right and there’s nothing in it for the USA.

What is your point?

Obama didn’t “give” Iran money (he unfroze some of the Iranian deposits in U.S.-controlled institutions and permitted them to retrieve it), but the Republicans have lived and breathed on the lie of “pallets of cash sent to Iran” for over a decade now.

Lather, rinse, repeat. It's all exhausting.