Anonymous wrote:AUSA Comey: He coerced Cassie and Jane in to this - and nothing happened. He raped Mia - and nothing happened. He beat Cassie and nothing happened. He beat Cassie in hotel on tape, then bribed the guards to buy it - and nothing happened. He was untouchable
He did not think these woman would speak - and that Kid Cudi and Deonte Nash and other men would back them up. The defendant is not a God. He stands equal before the law. Find him guilty.

And that was how the prosecution finished up their rebuttal. The jurors have been released. I predict a verdict by Wednesday/Thursday.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How much does an overcharged prosecution case like this cost the taxpayers?

Are govt criminal prosecutors paid like $200-300k a year total and private defense attorneys make $1000/hour and over $1m a year income?

Is there a big chasm between the talent on each side here? I mean if I was a super smart, driven, analytical, persuasive attorney why would I stay in the public sector? (Unless trust fund or high income spouse, and even then, I’m probably naturally competitive so…)

Such a bonehead comparison. Are you really this dumb?

You do realize there isn’t a salaried $1M private defense attorney job that one applies for, right? This sort of salary comes only to a rarefied few who manage to develop a stable of wealthy clients who pay them these sorts of fees.

I see what camp you are in PP.

Whhhooooosh over your head.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict a guilty verdict and it won't take the jury very long to decide.

Agree. The defense closing statements are very disappointing. The judge even had to step in when Angifilo suggested that the prosecturos improperly decided what charges to bring. The judge told the jurors to disregard that part, and he didnt wait until the end, he stopped him immediately after he said it.

He told the jury diddy bought the video from the hotel security not because something illegal happened, he wasnt worried about that, but to protect both their public images.

Agnifilo said Diddy wouldn't have released those sex tapes, sure he might have said it, but he never would have done it.

Oh and he said Diddy wouldn't set Kid Cudi's car on fire. Diddy was a man, and as a man he would have confronted him and fought him, because that's what men do.

I would be livid if I were Diddy. Agnifilo was very undherwhelming, and sometimes, IMO, insulted the intellegence of the jury.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How much does an overcharged prosecution case like this cost the taxpayers?

Are govt criminal prosecutors paid like $200-300k a year total and private defense attorneys make $1000/hour and over $1m a year income?

Is there a big chasm between the talent on each side here? I mean if I was a super smart, driven, analytical, persuasive attorney why would I stay in the public sector? (Unless trust fund or high income spouse, and even then, I’m probably naturally competitive so…)

Such a bonehead comparison. Are you really this dumb?

You do realize there isn’t a salaried $1M private defense attorney job that one applies for, right? This sort of salary comes only to a rarefied few who manage to develop a stable of wealthy clients who pay them these sorts of fees.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict a guilty verdict and it won't take the jury very long to decide.

Agree. The defense closing statements are very disappointing. The judge even had to step in when Angifilo suggested that the prosecturos improperly decided what charges to bring. The judge told the jurors to disregard that part, and he didnt wait until the end, he stopped him immediately after he said it.

He told the jury diddy bought the video from the hotel security not because something illegal happened, he wasnt worried about that, but to protect both their public images.

Agnifilo said Diddy wouldn't have released those sex tapes, sure he might have said it, but he never would have done it.

Oh and he said Diddy wouldn't set Kid Cudi's car on fire. Diddy was a man, and as a man he would have confronted him and fought him, because that's what men do.

I would be livid if I were Diddy. Agnifilo was very undherwhelming, and sometimes, IMO, insulted the intellegence of the jury.

Shall see who fell for what.

Guess they deliberate Monday? Rebuttals today/Friday or do they want to wait until Monday?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I predict a guilty verdict and it won't take the jury very long to decide.

Agree. The defense closing statements are very disappointing. The judge even had to step in when Angifilo suggested that the prosecturos improperly decided what charges to bring. The judge told the jurors to disregard that part, and he didnt wait until the end, he stopped him immediately after he said it.

He told the jury diddy bought the video from the hotel security not because something illegal happened, he wasnt worried about that, but to protect both their public images.

Agnifilo said Diddy wouldn't have released those sex tapes, sure he might have said it, but he never would have done it.

Oh and he said Diddy wouldn't set Kid Cudi's car on fire. Diddy was a man, and as a man he would have confronted him and fought him, because that's what men do.

I would be livid if I were Diddy. Agnifilo was very undherwhelming, and sometimes, IMO, insulted the intellegence of the jury.

Anonymous wrote:This is a bit too far, what a crock

Defense says 'complicated' relationship with Ventura was 'great modern love story'

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I know I couldn't sleep at night if I were an attorney helping Sean Combs get out of a conviction.

Every person deserves a defense, even if you think it's deplorable. Defense attorneys are a vital part of our justice system.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How much does an overcharged prosecution case like this cost the taxpayers?

Are govt criminal prosecutors paid like $200-300k a year total and private defense attorneys make $1000/hour and over $1m a year income?

Is there a big chasm between the talent on each side here? I mean if I was a super smart, driven, analytical, persuasive attorney why would I stay in the public sector? (Unless trust fund or high income spouse, and even then, I’m probably naturally competitive so…)

Govt prosecutors make far less than that.

Anonymous wrote:I know I couldn't sleep at night if I were an attorney helping Sean Combs get out of a conviction.