Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reply brief! As dumb as I thought it would be
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22273348-trump-filing-responding-to-doj-in-his-request-for-a-special-master
Dear lord that’s a shitty brief.
And yet the judge will till appoint a special master because she can. DOJ recognized the likelihood and set forth ground rules it would seem reasonable.
This judge is a real wild card because she was appointed by Trump. It has been pointed out that she was also a federal prosecutor, but then again, so was Sidney Powell.
Federalist Society through and through. Her career advancement depends in a Republican in the WH. She doesn’t want to spend the next 25 years sitting as a district judge in West Palm Beach of all places.
Anonymous wrote:Don't you think DOJ will immediately appeal if she orders a special master? That would be a horrible precedent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reply brief! As dumb as I thought it would be
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22273348-trump-filing-responding-to-doj-in-his-request-for-a-special-master
Dear lord that’s a shitty brief.
And yet the judge will till appoint a special master because she can. DOJ recognized the likelihood and set forth ground rules it would seem reasonable.
This judge is a real wild card because she was appointed by Trump. It has been pointed out that she was also a federal prosecutor, but then again, so was Sidney Powell.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reply brief! As dumb as I thought it would be
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22273348-trump-filing-responding-to-doj-in-his-request-for-a-special-master
Dear lord that’s a shitty brief.
And yet the judge will till appoint a special master because she can. DOJ recognized the likelihood and set forth ground rules it would seem reasonable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reply brief! As dumb as I thought it would be
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22273348-trump-filing-responding-to-doj-in-his-request-for-a-special-master
Dear lord that’s a shitty brief.
And yet the judge will till appoint a special master because she can. DOJ recognized the likelihood and set forth ground rules it would seem reasonable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Reply brief! As dumb as I thought it would be
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/22273348-trump-filing-responding-to-doj-in-his-request-for-a-special-master
Dear lord that’s a shitty brief.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she probably meant obscure, except neither espionage or obstruction should be obscure especially not to a lawyer. Did she actually go to law school and practice law anywhere professionally?
You might be surprised what seems to be obscure from the standpoint of a lawyer practicing the high stakes field of parking garage litigation.
She just admitted that Trump has frequent guests in his office that was full of top secret classified documents.
What a complete idiot.
No one thinks Trump had those files out on the floor. They took whatever documents were found in the desk or drawers, and spread them out IN THE ROOM WHERE THEY WERE FOUND, to document what materials were located in the rooms. They were spread out so they could be photographed. The floor is likely the only available space with enough square footage to spread the documents out like that. A large conference table would also have worked.
The shocking thing is that the documents were there, and that apparently this woman was admits she was frequently in the office and would have had access to them. They were absolutely not secure in that case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she probably meant obscure, except neither espionage or obstruction should be obscure especially not to a lawyer. Did she actually go to law school and practice law anywhere professionally?
You might be surprised what seems to be obscure from the standpoint of a lawyer practicing the high stakes field of parking garage litigation.
She just admitted that Trump has frequent guests in his office that was full of top secret classified documents.
Is she a lawyer?
My understanding of the PRA is that Trump doesn't own any of the records from his administration. Is she just lying or a complete idiot?
And if the records are "declassified" as she claims, why aren't they marked as such? Why is there no official record of Trump declassifying them? And why are these records in a location that's not secured? How is that not illegal?
And doesn't she see the ruler and the card in the photo identifying these items as evidence? Pretty standard police procedure as I understand it. How could she not know that?
Can she be disbarred for being stupid? Ignorant of the law? Lying on TV?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she probably meant obscure, except neither espionage or obstruction should be obscure especially not to a lawyer. Did she actually go to law school and practice law anywhere professionally?
You might be surprised what seems to be obscure from the standpoint of a lawyer practicing the high stakes field of parking garage litigation.
She just admitted that Trump has frequent guests in his office that was full of top secret classified documents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she probably meant obscure, except neither espionage or obstruction should be obscure especially not to a lawyer. Did she actually go to law school and practice law anywhere professionally?
You might be surprised what seems to be obscure from the standpoint of a lawyer practicing the high stakes field of parking garage litigation.
She just admitted that Trump has frequent guests in his office that was full of top secret classified documents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think she probably meant obscure, except neither espionage or obstruction should be obscure especially not to a lawyer. Did she actually go to law school and practice law anywhere professionally?
You might be surprised what seems to be obscure from the standpoint of a lawyer practicing the high stakes field of parking garage litigation.