Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brandon liked a picture on Tina’s Instagram on May 23, 2020. Jen posted an anniversary post on June 30, 2020 and announced the family crisis a month or so later. I know you can like posts after the fact, however, he didn’t like another post for quite awhile and as soon as Tina posted him on Insta, he began liking all her posts. Seems unlikely he would scroll all the way back and only like that one post. I think he knew Tina before he and Jen split although he has said different. Also, a lot of her posts seem to be hinting at him very close to the official split.

He also liked a post of hers from August 2019.

Anonymous wrote:
this guy is an inch deep.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brandon liked a picture on Tina’s Instagram on May 23, 2020. Jen posted an anniversary post on June 30, 2020 and announced the family crisis a month or so later. I know you can like posts after the fact, however, he didn’t like another post for quite awhile and as soon as Tina posted him on Insta, he began liking all her posts. Seems unlikely he would scroll all the way back and only like that one post. I think he knew Tina before he and Jen split although he has said different. Also, a lot of her posts seem to be hinting at him very close to the official split.

He also liked a post of hers from August 2019.

Brandon also posted during quarantine that he just couldn’t find a rhythm, but what was helping him was exercise and outdoors. At the same time, Tina was posting lots of hikes and outdoor adventures…

Still an affairs just doesn’t seem to add up to all that has been alluded to…their male friends waiting outside to protect and support Jen while she confronted Brandon with what she could never unsee…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brandon liked a picture on Tina’s Instagram on May 23, 2020. Jen posted an anniversary post on June 30, 2020 and announced the family crisis a month or so later. I know you can like posts after the fact, however, he didn’t like another post for quite awhile and as soon as Tina posted him on Insta, he began liking all her posts. Seems unlikely he would scroll all the way back and only like that one post. I think he knew Tina before he and Jen split although he has said different. Also, a lot of her posts seem to be hinting at him very close to the official split.

He also liked a post of hers from August 2019.

Anonymous wrote:Brandon liked a picture on Tina’s Instagram on May 23, 2020. Jen posted an anniversary post on June 30, 2020 and announced the family crisis a month or so later. I know you can like posts after the fact, however, he didn’t like another post for quite awhile and as soon as Tina posted him on Insta, he began liking all her posts. Seems unlikely he would scroll all the way back and only like that one post. I think he knew Tina before he and Jen split although he has said different. Also, a lot of her posts seem to be hinting at him very close to the official split.

Anonymous wrote:

yeah yeah you are The Enlightened One who figured it all out and if we disagree with you we're closeminded haters and a homophobes who just like the other 5000 years worth of apostles and theologians don't understand what the bible "really meant" until it was revealed to some very precious holy chosen prophets within the last couple decades
blah blah 🥱
please let's move on

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we move onto more fun topics?!

Time should have stayed private. I thought (based on Brandon’s pics and the assessment given here) that she was probably super sweet, maybe a little dumb and caught up in a bunch of drama that she didn’t seek out or deserve. However, after reading through a bunch of her Insta posts - especially her most recent one 😅🙄 - I think she is HERE for the drama. A lot of her captions have the feel of being written by an immature girl to her “haters.” Soooooo much gushing about her man, describing their perfect night, how happy they are, etc. It’s like Jen, but she doesn’t have the writing skills to hide the fact that she’s posting with a clear agenda!

And why make her account public? She has over 1,500 followers now, but very little engagement on posts, so most people are just lurking. Does anyone know how many she previously had?

I do think she probably is genuinely into Brandon. The cheap dresses and shoes make me think she feels like she hit the jackpot with a guy that buys her tacky name brand gifts with oversized logos so everyone knows their name brand, takes her to expensive chain steakhouses, and on Mexico weekends. She probably really likes him, but as someone who was once in a relationship with a guy who had a toxic ex situation I know there’s a bit of an adrenaline high that comes from feeling like you won and wanting the right people to know you won. I also know those relationships often end badly.


yes - I am thinking she's more Mean Girl than Ditzy Sweet Girl.

Altho in 99.999% of divorces, ex trashes their ex to new boo. Who knows what Brandon has told her.

PS - Tina, Brandon used to have almost no SM interaction, especially Insta. Now he posts your boobs alllll the time. It is so obvious he and Jen are in the Olympics of F You competition via Instagram. So if you think he's over his ex-wife, girl, you're as dumb as you spend so much time and money trying to look.

Also, she’s not as cute as I thought she was.

OOF that overbite on her. Why spend all that money on fake boobs and fake hair and fake nails when you have that kinda overbite?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Honest question here, I promise. I do not mean this as a “gotcha” or argumentative in any way. I’m just seeking to learn more.
You stated here that basic human rights are being denied to whole groups of people. I assume you are referring to LGBTQ based on the thread. Re-reading through the comments, it seems like the issue being debated is whether or not this is considered a “sin”. For those with a traditional, biblical belief system, I think the answer is yes. So the basic human right being denied is - whether or not someone thinks someone else is going to heaven (or hell)? I’m genuinely confused. It seems as though the demand here is for people to alter their personal beliefs to assure someone else is “ok”. It seems strange. I consider myself a “sinner”. Whether or not you believe I am going to heaven (or hell) is of no consequence to me.

No offense taken to the question! The basic human rights I’m referring to are marriage, adoption, affirming health care for trans people, etc. These things are under very real attack at both the state and national level right now.

While I think the non-affirming position is incorrect theologically and harmful to the church, I don’t mean to equate that with human rights. The problem is that the lack of separation between church and state allows the former to influence the latter.

yeah yeah you are The Enlightened One who figured it all out and if we disagree with you we're closeminded haters and a homophobes who just like the other 5000 years worth of apostles and theologians don't understand what the bible "really meant" until it was revealed to some very precious holy chosen prophets within the last couple decades
blah blah 🥱
please let's move on

I take offense— honestly, if someone puts LBGQT…. All the letters, into a class that is less than any one else, then that person and the “religion” or “god” they follow is simply a terrible human being. Seriously. If you can’t accept someone because of how and who they love, then you are a bad human and frankly I don’t want anything to do with that type of person. And don’t give me the “hate the sin, love the sinner” BS. That’s just a cop out. You are literally saying that you are better than some one because he/she is gay or trans or whatever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can we move onto more fun topics?!

Time should have stayed private. I thought (based on Brandon’s pics and the assessment given here) that she was probably super sweet, maybe a little dumb and caught up in a bunch of drama that she didn’t seek out or deserve. However, after reading through a bunch of her Insta posts - especially her most recent one 😅🙄 - I think she is HERE for the drama. A lot of her captions have the feel of being written by an immature girl to her “haters.” Soooooo much gushing about her man, describing their perfect night, how happy they are, etc. It’s like Jen, but she doesn’t have the writing skills to hide the fact that she’s posting with a clear agenda!

And why make her account public? She has over 1,500 followers now, but very little engagement on posts, so most people are just lurking. Does anyone know how many she previously had?

I do think she probably is genuinely into Brandon. The cheap dresses and shoes make me think she feels like she hit the jackpot with a guy that buys her tacky name brand gifts with oversized logos so everyone knows their name brand, takes her to expensive chain steakhouses, and on Mexico weekends. She probably really likes him, but as someone who was once in a relationship with a guy who had a toxic ex situation I know there’s a bit of an adrenaline high that comes from feeling like you won and wanting the right people to know you won. I also know those relationships often end badly.


yes - I am thinking she's more Mean Girl than Ditzy Sweet Girl.

Altho in 99.999% of divorces, ex trashes their ex to new boo. Who knows what Brandon has told her.

PS - Tina, Brandon used to have almost no SM interaction, especially Insta. Now he posts your boobs alllll the time. It is so obvious he and Jen are in the Olympics of F You competition via Instagram. So if you think he's over his ex-wife, girl, you're as dumb as you spend so much time and money trying to look.

Also, she’s not as cute as I thought she was.

Anonymous wrote:Can we move onto more fun topics?!

Time should have stayed private. I thought (based on Brandon’s pics and the assessment given here) that she was probably super sweet, maybe a little dumb and caught up in a bunch of drama that she didn’t seek out or deserve. However, after reading through a bunch of her Insta posts - especially her most recent one 😅🙄 - I think she is HERE for the drama. A lot of her captions have the feel of being written by an immature girl to her “haters.” Soooooo much gushing about her man, describing their perfect night, how happy they are, etc. It’s like Jen, but she doesn’t have the writing skills to hide the fact that she’s posting with a clear agenda!

And why make her account public? She has over 1,500 followers now, but very little engagement on posts, so most people are just lurking. Does anyone know how many she previously had?

I do think she probably is genuinely into Brandon. The cheap dresses and shoes make me think she feels like she hit the jackpot with a guy that buys her tacky name brand gifts with oversized logos so everyone knows their name brand, takes her to expensive chain steakhouses, and on Mexico weekends. She probably really likes him, but as someone who was once in a relationship with a guy who had a toxic ex situation I know there’s a bit of an adrenaline high that comes from feeling like you won and wanting the right people to know you won. I also know those relationships often end badly.


yes - I am thinking she's more Mean Girl than Ditzy Sweet Girl.

Altho in 99.999% of divorces, ex trashes their ex to new boo. Who knows what Brandon has told her.

PS - Tina, Brandon used to have almost no SM interaction, especially Insta. Now he posts your boobs alllll the time. It is so obvious he and Jen are in the Olympics of F You competition via Instagram. So if you think he's over his ex-wife, girl, you're as dumb as you spend so much time and money trying to look.

Also, she’s not as cute as I thought she was.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Honest question here, I promise. I do not mean this as a “gotcha” or argumentative in any way. I’m just seeking to learn more.
You stated here that basic human rights are being denied to whole groups of people. I assume you are referring to LGBTQ based on the thread. Re-reading through the comments, it seems like the issue being debated is whether or not this is considered a “sin”. For those with a traditional, biblical belief system, I think the answer is yes. So the basic human right being denied is - whether or not someone thinks someone else is going to heaven (or hell)? I’m genuinely confused. It seems as though the demand here is for people to alter their personal beliefs to assure someone else is “ok”. It seems strange. I consider myself a “sinner”. Whether or not you believe I am going to heaven (or hell) is of no consequence to me.

No offense taken to the question! The basic human rights I’m referring to are marriage, adoption, affirming health care for trans people, etc. These things are under very real attack at both the state and national level right now.

While I think the non-affirming position is incorrect theologically and harmful to the church, I don’t mean to equate that with human rights. The problem is that the lack of separation between church and state allows the former to influence the latter.

yeah yeah you are The Enlightened One who figured it all out and if we disagree with you we're closeminded haters and a homophobes who just like the other 5000 years worth of apostles and theologians don't understand what the bible "really meant" until it was revealed to some very precious holy chosen prophets within the last couple decades
blah blah 🥱
please let's move on

I take offense— honestly, if someone puts LBGQT…. All the letters, into a class that is less than any one else, then that person and the “religion” or “god” they follow is simply a terrible human being. Seriously. If you can’t accept someone because of how and who they love, then you are a bad human and frankly I don’t want anything to do with that type of person. And don’t give me the “hate the sin, love the sinner” BS. That’s just a cop out. You are literally saying that you are better than some one because he/she is gay or trans or whatever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Honest question here, I promise. I do not mean this as a “gotcha” or argumentative in any way. I’m just seeking to learn more.
You stated here that basic human rights are being denied to whole groups of people. I assume you are referring to LGBTQ based on the thread. Re-reading through the comments, it seems like the issue being debated is whether or not this is considered a “sin”. For those with a traditional, biblical belief system, I think the answer is yes. So the basic human right being denied is - whether or not someone thinks someone else is going to heaven (or hell)? I’m genuinely confused. It seems as though the demand here is for people to alter their personal beliefs to assure someone else is “ok”. It seems strange. I consider myself a “sinner”. Whether or not you believe I am going to heaven (or hell) is of no consequence to me.

No offense taken to the question! The basic human rights I’m referring to are marriage, adoption, affirming health care for trans people, etc. These things are under very real attack at both the state and national level right now.

While I think the non-affirming position is incorrect theologically and harmful to the church, I don’t mean to equate that with human rights. The problem is that the lack of separation between church and state allows the former to influence the latter.

yeah yeah you are The Enlightened One who figured it all out and if we disagree with you we're closeminded haters and a homophobes who just like the other 5000 years worth of apostles and theologians don't understand what the bible "really meant" until it was revealed to some very precious holy chosen prophets within the last couple decades
blah blah 🥱
please let's move on


I take offense— honestly, if someone puts LBGQT…. All the letters, into a class that is less than any one else, then that person and the “religion” or “god” they follow is simply a terrible human being. Seriously. If you can’t accept someone because of how and who they love, then you are a bad human and frankly I don’t want anything to do with that type of person. And don’t give me the “hate the sin, love the sinner” BS. That’s just a cop out. You are literally saying that you are better than some one because he/she is gay or trans or whatever.