Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
06/22/2023 11:21
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
If it gets on the ballot, it will pass - it's just a matter of getting enough signatures.
https://floridiansprotectingfreedom.com/petition/
Anonymous
Anonymous
06/22/2023 11:13
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous
06/21/2023 21:26
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Read this tidbit from that article -- any anti-abortionists brave enough comment? Do you not care that these bans are going to impact women's access to health care in the states that enact them? Be honest now.
In February, a group of students, residents and faculty surveyed 2,063 licensed and trainee physicians and found that 82 percent want to work or train in states that retain abortion accessâand 76 percent would refuse to apply in states that restrict it. (The respondents worked in a mix of specialties; for those whose work would include performing abortions, the proportion intending to work where it remains legal soared above 99 percent.)
Then in April, a study from the Association of American Medical Colleges drawing on the first round of applications to residency programs after Dobbs found that ob-gyn applications in states with abortion restrictions sank by 10 percent compared to the previous year. Applications to all ob-gyn programs dropped by 5 percent. (Nationwide, all applications to residency went down 2 percent from 2021 to 2022.)
Last month, two preliminary pieces of research presented at the annual meeting of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists uncovered more perturbations. In Texasâwhere the restrictive law SB8 went into effect in September 2021, nine months before Dobbsâa multi-year upward trend in applications to ob-gyn residency slowed after the law passed. And in an unrelated national survey, 77 percent of 494 third- and fourth-year medical students said that abortion restrictions would affect where they applied to residency, while 58 percent said they were unlikely to apply to states with a ban.
Anonymous
06/21/2023 19:29
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
They don't care. All they'll say is that older women shouldn't be having babies. If women don't go to college and they start having babies when they leave school, the maternal and infant mortality rate will be lower. Educated women are competing for what they consider to be men's jobs.
I know dead women are a feature, not a bug, for the anti-abortion group, but looking at the uptick even in young women should give some of them pauseâŚ
Should, but wonât. I mean it when I say that women arenât people in the GOP. They donât care.
This is 100% correct. Women are dispensable vessels and if they die from childbirth, thatâs their fate. they are not people. They are livestock.
+1 Y'all cain't take away mah freedom.
Do shut up. You aren't funny.
Anonymous
06/21/2023 19:19
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
The people who wanted this wanted *this*.
They want you poorâ if youâre spending $1000 to get basic medical care out of state because you no longer can get a Pap smear, youâre not donating that $1000 to causes they hate.
They want you busyâ takes a whole day to get that Pap smear or mammogram? Youâre not teaching your kid to read. Youâre not showing up at a school board meeting to speak out against banning books.
They want you scaredâ they want you to think you could bleed out in a bathroom, be forced to deliver a headless fetus, watch your daughter beg for care until she dies of sepsisâŚbecause then you will believe they are powerful because there is nothing scarier than this.
Anonymous
06/21/2023 18:50
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Anonymous wrote:Found on the Elong Mush thread. Weâre up against censorship from one of the largest platforms on which we could organize. It is a coordinated assault on womenâs rights (and human rights in general) under the auspices of âfree speechâ and âIâm just asking questionsâ right wing flavored extremism.
That is ridiculous but the pro-choice candidates.are going to absolutely crush it on election day with or without Elon musk and Twitter.
Anonymous
06/21/2023 18:18
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Found on the Elong Mush thread. Weâre up against censorship from one of the largest platforms on which we could organize. It is a coordinated assault on womenâs rights (and human rights in general) under the auspices of âfree speechâ and âIâm just asking questionsâ right wing flavored extremism.
Anonymous
Anonymous
06/18/2023 09:47
Subject: Roe v Wade struck down
Where are the lawsuits.....men get better health care than women which is a violation if equal protection
Anonymous
06/18/2023 07:42
Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down
Oh for sure. Theyâre fascists. I find it funny that so many MoDeRaTeS are so eager to do the fascistsâ dirty work of low level PR. I mean thatâs kind of what this site can be, for all viewpoints, right?