Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CB was active on fetlife. JR was not the first person she met there.

I'm sure there is a slew of physical evidence and forensic evidence that will be discussed at the trial. But the prosecution is taking an interesting approach by suggesting that CB didn't set up this account. If they can prove this, it immediately implicates BB and AP. And if not, it seems like a big misstep. So I hope they are correct. Because they probably still could have made a case against them if this was CB's account.

I doubt any other convos would come out, unless the defense is able to subpoena fetlife directly. The prosecution wouldn't present evidence that would hurt their case.

It is a bold claim to say that "Her parents and friends said she wasn't into fetish stuff. So it's clearly someone else". I wonder what evidence they truly have. How many people tell their parents about their sex life? "Hi mom, how's dad? I'm going to have a guy come over and simulate r*ping me today. How's the knee been?"

I can absolutely understand why her friends and family are having a difficult time believing she could be into this. It’s really taboo and it’s hard to accept that people we love might have this whole other side to them that we don’t know about.

If I were the investigators, I’d rely less on family / friends statements and more on circumstantial evidence. What’s her browsing history like? Did she have a lot of, ahem, toys in her bedroom? Etc etc. We can hide stuff like this from our friends but if it was really her on that website, you’d think there’d be other signs of what she was into on her phone, computer and bedroom.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CB was active on fetlife. JR was not the first person she met there.

I'm sure there is a slew of physical evidence and forensic evidence that will be discussed at the trial. But the prosecution is taking an interesting approach by suggesting that CB didn't set up this account. If they can prove this, it immediately implicates BB and AP. And if not, it seems like a big misstep. So I hope they are correct. Because they probably still could have made a case against them if this was CB's account.

I doubt any other convos would come out, unless the defense is able to subpoena fetlife directly. The prosecution wouldn't present evidence that would hurt their case.

It is a bold claim to say that "Her parents and friends said she wasn't into fetish stuff. So it's clearly someone else". I wonder what evidence they truly have. How many people tell their parents about their sex life? "Hi mom, how's dad? I'm going to have a guy come over and simulate r*ping me today. How's the knee been?"

Does anyone have the details of location/time of the hearing on the 18th? I was thinking of going…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CB was active on fetlife. JR was not the first person she met there.

I'm sure there is a slew of physical evidence and forensic evidence that will be discussed at the trial. But the prosecution is taking an interesting approach by suggesting that CB didn't set up this account. If they can prove this, it immediately implicates BB and AP. And if not, it seems like a big misstep. So I hope they are correct. Because they probably still could have made a case against them if this was CB's account.

Agree with all of this.

Wonder if there will be another round of media coverage after the hearing to set trial dates? Think that one was the 18th? Can't imagine the grand jury won't indict.

Someone mentioned the WP being at the bond hearing but I never saw an article. Maybe they will do a "catch up" piece, the one in December had a lot of details.

No media allowed at the Grand Jury and defense does not present anything.

I am also wondering why WP and other outlets aren't reporting on what wen ton at the bond hearing b.c it apparently uncovered some new info.

The Grand Jury on the 15th is closed but there is a hearing re: trial schedule on the 18th which is open. I don't think new info will come out but was suggesting that the WP may do a piece around that time that could include details from the prior bond hearing (either from their reporter attending or from documents/transcript). WP has really cut local staffing coverage. Outlets that covered the prelim did not cover the bond hearing same week. Anyway, you are free to disagree with my speculation.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CB was active on fetlife. JR was not the first person she met there.

I'm sure there is a slew of physical evidence and forensic evidence that will be discussed at the trial. But the prosecution is taking an interesting approach by suggesting that CB didn't set up this account. If they can prove this, it immediately implicates BB and AP. And if not, it seems like a big misstep. So I hope they are correct. Because they probably still could have made a case against them if this was CB's account.

Agree with all of this.

Wonder if there will be another round of media coverage after the hearing to set trial dates? Think that one was the 18th? Can't imagine the grand jury won't indict.

Someone mentioned the WP being at the bond hearing but I never saw an article. Maybe they will do a "catch up" piece, the one in December had a lot of details.

No media allowed at the Grand Jury and defense does not present anything.

I am also wondering why WP and other outlets aren't reporting on what wen ton at the bond hearing b.c it apparently uncovered some new info.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CB was active on fetlife. JR was not the first person she met there.

I'm sure there is a slew of physical evidence and forensic evidence that will be discussed at the trial. But the prosecution is taking an interesting approach by suggesting that CB didn't set up this account. If they can prove this, it immediately implicates BB and AP. And if not, it seems like a big misstep. So I hope they are correct. Because they probably still could have made a case against them if this was CB's account.

Agree with all of this.

Wonder if there will be another round of media coverage after the hearing to set trial dates? Think that one was the 18th? Can't imagine the grand jury won't indict.

Someone mentioned the WP being at the bond hearing but I never saw an article. Maybe they will do a "catch up" piece, the one in December had a lot of details.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:CB was active on fetlife. JR was not the first person she met there.

I'm sure there is a slew of physical evidence and forensic evidence that will be discussed at the trial. But the prosecution is taking an interesting approach by suggesting that CB didn't set up this account. If they can prove this, it immediately implicates BB and AP. And if not, it seems like a big misstep. So I hope they are correct. Because they probably still could have made a case against them if this was CB's account.

I imagine the computer and the website may be able to provide information re: when the account was created. If there are spelling and grammar mistakes more consistent with ESL and it was set up recently would be significant.

I'm not sure how much it will come up in the trial against the AP since the current charges don't involve motive at all. I think that so much detail has come out to try to flip her. Maybe they will add charges. Otherwise seems most likely to come out if there is ever a trial against BB.

If she is convicted, serves sentence minus time already served and is deported, what does she gain by not flipping? Would she be able to come back to the US if he married her then? Is there some possible future together somehow? I really think her mom did her no favors by talking to media in Brazil. Better to keep it as quiet as possible, she is still really young.

If he doesn't slow down wonder if he may get weekend jail and suspended license?

Anonymous wrote:CB was active on fetlife. JR was not the first person she met there.

I'm sure there is a slew of physical evidence and forensic evidence that will be discussed at the trial. But the prosecution is taking an interesting approach by suggesting that CB didn't set up this account. If they can prove this, it immediately implicates BB and AP. And if not, it seems like a big misstep. So I hope they are correct. Because they probably still could have made a case against them if this was CB's account.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody has explained how he got up to her bedroom.

With his 2 legs. Walked in the door he was told would be unlocked and walked upstairs.

Likely.

So sad that JR and CB are not still alive. So much evil in the world. There was NO reason to not just separate but greed. Smh. And that poor little girl.

Anonymous wrote:Nobody has explained how he got up to her bedroom.

With his 2 legs. Walked in the door he was told would be unlocked and walked upstairs.

WHAT IF:

AP finds out about CB talking to JR
AP tells BB
BB then starts planning all of this?

Send the nanny w the kids to a hotel^

Not PP but since this is anonymous I gotta say it: I was a little crazy in my 20’s before I settled down. I used to be on sites like that, you guys have no idea how many of those “American Dream” families are on there.
Your kid’s teachers. Your doctors. Huge variety of people you’d never imagine having these kinds of thoughts.
No.Idea.
I’ve met a couple once that would send the nanny to a hotel so they had the house to themselves to throw swing parties.

Anonymous wrote:I think that is the same platform perv pedo mom Eleanor Hoppe was on when she made the plan that got her arrested.

PP, how does it work, are there forums for different interests like c*ck scenes, etc.?

It’s like Twitter (or X), with posts from different people, I think you can add connections, and look for people in your area.
There are events too. Like house parties, parties at hotels, etc Lol

I think that is the same platform perv pedo mom Eleanor Hoppe was on when she made the plan that got her arrested.

PP, how does it work, are there forums for different interests like c*ck scenes, etc.?