Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK I read like 3 articles and I *think* I finally understand what short selling is. Someone thinks a stock is going to go down, so they borrow shares at a certain price (say, $10) and pay a fee for doing so. Then when the price goes down to say $5, they buy a bunch of shares on the open market at the lower price to pay back the ones they borrowed. Is that right? So they sell the borrowed ones for 10 and buy replacements at 5, and make $5 per share (minus the borrowing fee).
if so, what is "naked" shorting? Something about not having a timeline on the borrowing? I need someone to ELI5 all of this haha.
Naked means not owning the underlying shares.
In other words, selling something they don't own. The borrowing is just to make it legalish and they have no rights to those shares.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like the stonks. Who bought AMC at 22 today. Lol
I’m in at 12.50 but even if it goes to 20 again AH I am not selling until I see what happens tomorrow. It’ll be a wild ride!
I bought 1 share of NOK, GME, and amc to support my wsb brethren but this won’t end well
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like the stonks. Who bought AMC at 22 today. Lol
I’m in at 12.50 but even if it goes to 20 again AH I am not selling until I see what happens tomorrow. It’ll be a wild ride!
I bought 1 share of NOK, GME, and amc to support my wsb brethren but this won’t end well
End well for whom? For you? I have no idea. For Robinhood? I agree, they're not going to end well.
For Gamestop? This is better for them than the undervaluing.
I'm guessing PP is talking about the majority of the retail investors that are left holding the bag. I don't know one way or another, I'm holding the line and willing to take it in the chin to F the short sellers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK I read like 3 articles and I *think* I finally understand what short selling is. Someone thinks a stock is going to go down, so they borrow shares at a certain price (say, $10) and pay a fee for doing so. Then when the price goes down to say $5, they buy a bunch of shares on the open market at the lower price to pay back the ones they borrowed. Is that right? So they sell the borrowed ones for 10 and buy replacements at 5, and make $5 per share (minus the borrowing fee).
if so, what is "naked" shorting? Something about not having a timeline on the borrowing? I need someone to ELI5 all of this haha.
Naked means not owning the underlying shares.
PP here - so that means they're on the hook for the shares they already short sold, and have to get them wherever they can - like buying on the open market at a high price? And in this case I guess there aren't that many shares out there in the first place.
Now I need to figure out what calls and options are. If anyone knows of a good 101-level resource (other than Wikipedia) I'd love it!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK I read like 3 articles and I *think* I finally understand what short selling is. Someone thinks a stock is going to go down, so they borrow shares at a certain price (say, $10) and pay a fee for doing so. Then when the price goes down to say $5, they buy a bunch of shares on the open market at the lower price to pay back the ones they borrowed. Is that right? So they sell the borrowed ones for 10 and buy replacements at 5, and make $5 per share (minus the borrowing fee).
if so, what is "naked" shorting? Something about not having a timeline on the borrowing? I need someone to ELI5 all of this haha.
Naked means not owning the underlying shares.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK I read like 3 articles and I *think* I finally understand what short selling is. Someone thinks a stock is going to go down, so they borrow shares at a certain price (say, $10) and pay a fee for doing so. Then when the price goes down to say $5, they buy a bunch of shares on the open market at the lower price to pay back the ones they borrowed. Is that right? So they sell the borrowed ones for 10 and buy replacements at 5, and make $5 per share (minus the borrowing fee).
if so, what is "naked" shorting? Something about not having a timeline on the borrowing? I need someone to ELI5 all of this haha.
Naked means not owning the underlying shares.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OK I read like 3 articles and I *think* I finally understand what short selling is. Someone thinks a stock is going to go down, so they borrow shares at a certain price (say, $10) and pay a fee for doing so. Then when the price goes down to say $5, they buy a bunch of shares on the open market at the lower price to pay back the ones they borrowed. Is that right? So they sell the borrowed ones for 10 and buy replacements at 5, and make $5 per share (minus the borrowing fee).
if so, what is "naked" shorting? Something about not having a timeline on the borrowing? I need someone to ELI5 all of this haha.
Naked means not owning the underlying shares.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like the stonks. Who bought AMC at 22 today. Lol
I’m in at 12.50 but even if it goes to 20 again AH I am not selling until I see what happens tomorrow. It’ll be a wild ride!
I bought 1 share of NOK, GME, and amc to support my wsb brethren but this won’t end well
End well for whom? For you? I have no idea. For Robinhood? I agree, they're not going to end well.
For Gamestop? This is better for them than the undervaluing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like the stonks. Who bought AMC at 22 today. Lol
I’m in at 12.50 but even if it goes to 20 again AH I am not selling until I see what happens tomorrow. It’ll be a wild ride!
I bought 1 share of NOK, GME, and amc to support my wsb brethren but this won’t end well
Anonymous wrote:OK I read like 3 articles and I *think* I finally understand what short selling is. Someone thinks a stock is going to go down, so they borrow shares at a certain price (say, $10) and pay a fee for doing so. Then when the price goes down to say $5, they buy a bunch of shares on the open market at the lower price to pay back the ones they borrowed. Is that right? So they sell the borrowed ones for 10 and buy replacements at 5, and make $5 per share (minus the borrowing fee).
if so, what is "naked" shorting? Something about not having a timeline on the borrowing? I need someone to ELI5 all of this haha.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like the stonks. Who bought AMC at 22 today. Lol
I’m in at 12.50 but even if it goes to 20 again AH I am not selling until I see what happens tomorrow. It’ll be a wild ride!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Schwab restricted margin trades, which is reasonable, but allowed buy orders. Robin Hood is partly owned by Citadel who also have a large investment in one of the hedge funds getting killed by this. Did anyone other than RH completely bar buy orders?
ApexClearing blocked buy orders of GME, AMC, and others. Apex provides clearing for retail platforms on SoFi, Goldman Sachs, etc.
Tons of platforms were locked out buying, but only allowing selling,
"Because of the volatility"? What were they thinking? Do they think they'll get away with this?