Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

Then please consider voting Democrat for House and Senate, no matter who. Because you don't want a federal ban on women's freedoms, you don't want a massive rollback of climate change plans that will affect you in your lifetime, you don't want a country more awash in guns than it already is.

All of those are good goals, but we are facing some immediate crises in our nation that will not go away on their own. I will continue to consider her, but in Georgia, we have been well-insulated (relatively speaking) from the gas crisis with the lowest prices in the US. Although inflation is high in the north ATL suburbs, it is low overall. Covid was handled well so our business environment is good. Crime escalated in north ATL with the defund the police nonsense, but the rest of the state fared well and ATL is getting its crap together. This is all making Georgia affordable for lower income while being an attractive home to wealthier residents. This is too precarious to screw around with for undefined abortion and climate goals that are usually too extreme to win.

Pregnant 10 years olds and elementary schools getting shot up with AR-15s are defined issues to me. But I guess you don’t care unless it’s your own kid who gets raped or shot.

Its one thing to care about these issues and quite a different thing to think and inexperienced but famous Stacey Abrams will be able to fix them. Kemp has a solid track record for results and Abrams doesnt-- as a voter, why would I take that risk? Other states that have taken similar risks have suffered for their choice.

How is she inexperienced? 10 years in the Georgia Assembly, 6 as Minority Leader, career as tax attorney and legal consultant, involved in dozens of state and local organizations and initiatives.

Are you supporting Hershel Walker for Senate but saying Stacey Abrams isn’t qualified for Governor?

She’s not inexperienced. Right wingers just realize that their old coded language was getting too obvious. So now the experienced person is “inexperienced.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

Then please consider voting Democrat for House and Senate, no matter who. Because you don't want a federal ban on women's freedoms, you don't want a massive rollback of climate change plans that will affect you in your lifetime, you don't want a country more awash in guns than it already is.

All of those are good goals, but we are facing some immediate crises in our nation that will not go away on their own. I will continue to consider her, but in Georgia, we have been well-insulated (relatively speaking) from the gas crisis with the lowest prices in the US. Although inflation is high in the north ATL suburbs, it is low overall. Covid was handled well so our business environment is good. Crime escalated in north ATL with the defund the police nonsense, but the rest of the state fared well and ATL is getting its crap together. This is all making Georgia affordable for lower income while being an attractive home to wealthier residents. This is too precarious to screw around with for undefined abortion and climate goals that are usually too extreme to win.

Pregnant 10 years olds and elementary schools getting shot up with AR-15s are defined issues to me. But I guess you don’t care unless it’s your own kid who gets raped or shot.

Its one thing to care about these issues and quite a different thing to think and inexperienced but famous Stacey Abrams will be able to fix them. Kemp has a solid track record for results and Abrams doesnt-- as a voter, why would I take that risk? Other states that have taken similar risks have suffered for their choice.

How is she inexperienced? 10 years in the Georgia Assembly, 6 as Minority Leader, career as tax attorney and legal consultant, involved in dozens of state and local organizations and initiatives.

Are you supporting Hershel Walker for Senate but saying Stacey Abrams isn’t qualified for Governor?

Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t she still claim she won the last election?

Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t she still claim she won the last election?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

Then please consider voting Democrat for House and Senate, no matter who. Because you don't want a federal ban on women's freedoms, you don't want a massive rollback of climate change plans that will affect you in your lifetime, you don't want a country more awash in guns than it already is.

All of those are good goals, but we are facing some immediate crises in our nation that will not go away on their own. I will continue to consider her, but in Georgia, we have been well-insulated (relatively speaking) from the gas crisis with the lowest prices in the US. Although inflation is high in the north ATL suburbs, it is low overall. Covid was handled well so our business environment is good. Crime escalated in north ATL with the defund the police nonsense, but the rest of the state fared well and ATL is getting its crap together. This is all making Georgia affordable for lower income while being an attractive home to wealthier residents. This is too precarious to screw around with for undefined abortion and climate goals that are usually too extreme to win.

Pregnant 10 years olds and elementary schools getting shot up with AR-15s are defined issues to me. But I guess you don’t care unless it’s your own kid who gets raped or shot.

Its one thing to care about these issues and quite a different thing to think and inexperienced but famous Stacey Abrams will be able to fix them. Kemp has a solid track record for results and Abrams doesnt-- as a voter, why would I take that risk? Other states that have taken similar risks have suffered for their choice.

She consistently violates election laws with most ever one she runs because it is required for the candidate to say their name and they approve this message.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

Then please consider voting Democrat for House and Senate, no matter who. Because you don't want a federal ban on women's freedoms, you don't want a massive rollback of climate change plans that will affect you in your lifetime, you don't want a country more awash in guns than it already is.

All of those are good goals, but we are facing some immediate crises in our nation that will not go away on their own. I will continue to consider her, but in Georgia, we have been well-insulated (relatively speaking) from the gas crisis with the lowest prices in the US. Although inflation is high in the north ATL suburbs, it is low overall. Covid was handled well so our business environment is good. Crime escalated in north ATL with the defund the police nonsense, but the rest of the state fared well and ATL is getting its crap together. This is all making Georgia affordable for lower income while being an attractive home to wealthier residents. This is too precarious to screw around with for undefined abortion and climate goals that are usually too extreme to win.

Pregnant 10 years olds and elementary schools getting shot up with AR-15s are defined issues to me. But I guess you don’t care unless it’s your own kid who gets raped or shot.

Its one thing to care about these issues and quite a different thing to think and inexperienced but famous Stacey Abrams will be able to fix them. Kemp has a solid track record for results and Abrams doesnt-- as a voter, why would I take that risk? Other states that have taken similar risks have suffered for their choice.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

Then please consider voting Democrat for House and Senate, no matter who. Because you don't want a federal ban on women's freedoms, you don't want a massive rollback of climate change plans that will affect you in your lifetime, you don't want a country more awash in guns than it already is.

All of those are good goals, but we are facing some immediate crises in our nation that will not go away on their own. I will continue to consider her, but in Georgia, we have been well-insulated (relatively speaking) from the gas crisis with the lowest prices in the US. Although inflation is high in the north ATL suburbs, it is low overall. Covid was handled well so our business environment is good. Crime escalated in north ATL with the defund the police nonsense, but the rest of the state fared well and ATL is getting its crap together. This is all making Georgia affordable for lower income while being an attractive home to wealthier residents. This is too precarious to screw around with for undefined abortion and climate goals that are usually too extreme to win.

Pregnant 10 years olds and elementary schools getting shot up with AR-15s are defined issues to me. But I guess you don’t care unless it’s your own kid who gets raped or shot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

I’m curious; are you White?

Kemp cheated to get the job. I’m really appalled at the number of people who not only excuse that but want to reward it.

(And if you think he didn’t, then you should ask yourself why he oversaw his own election and why the election servers were wiped after they were subpoenaed.)

Ah - so you're keeping up the lie that Stacey Abrams won? But I bet you're appalled at the Stop the Steal business, right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm in Georgia and I won't vote for her. Im a swing voter that has been leaning right lately, but I still consider Ds. Kemp is doing a good job, and Im of the opinion that there is no reason to kick him out unless he begins to become ineffective. Abrams is also the riskier of the two-- she is relatively less experienced, and her high national profile counts as a negative because it means she will be looking to appease people who are not necessarily her constituents. Finally, her trash talk about Georgia is tone deaf.

Then please consider voting Democrat for House and Senate, no matter who. Because you don't want a federal ban on women's freedoms, you don't want a massive rollback of climate change plans that will affect you in your lifetime, you don't want a country more awash in guns than it already is.

All of those are good goals, but we are facing some immediate crises in our nation that will not go away on their own. I will continue to consider her, but in Georgia, we have been well-insulated (relatively speaking) from the gas crisis with the lowest prices in the US. Although inflation is high in the north ATL suburbs, it is low overall. Covid was handled well so our business environment is good. Crime escalated in north ATL with the defund the police nonsense, but the rest of the state fared well and ATL is getting its crap together. This is all making Georgia affordable for lower income while being an attractive home to wealthier residents. This is too precarious to screw around with for undefined abortion and climate goals that are usually too extreme to win.