Anonymous
12/04/2020 08:34
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any chance LCPS can amend their stand on that non-scientific metrics? I’m not looking forward to catching covid in January.
Yeah they’ll amend them. When we hit them and people still demand kids in school so they just make them higher. I have zero faith in this board to do the right thing.
They're doing the right thing by getting kids in school. They're setting a greatly needed example for the rest of the region.
So can we hope you catch covid and suffer life long issues with your lungs?
Anonymous
12/04/2020 06:09
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any chance LCPS can amend their stand on that non-scientific metrics? I’m not looking forward to catching covid in January.
Yeah they’ll amend them. When we hit them and people still demand kids in school so they just make them higher. I have zero faith in this board to do the right thing.
They're doing the right thing by getting kids in school. They're setting a greatly needed example for the rest of the region.
Whatever you say
Anonymous
12/04/2020 06:03
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Any chance LCPS can amend their stand on that non-scientific metrics? I’m not looking forward to catching covid in January.
Yeah they’ll amend them. When we hit them and people still demand kids in school so they just make them higher. I have zero faith in this board to do the right thing.
They're doing the right thing by getting kids in school. They're setting a greatly needed example for the rest of the region.
Anonymous
12/04/2020 05:19
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Anonymous wrote:Any chance LCPS can amend their stand on that non-scientific metrics? I’m not looking forward to catching covid in January.
Yeah they’ll amend them. When we hit them and people still demand kids in school so they just make them higher. I have zero faith in this board to do the right thing.
Anonymous
12/04/2020 01:20
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Any chance LCPS can amend their stand on that non-scientific metrics? I’m not looking forward to catching covid in January.
Anonymous
12/03/2020 22:03
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you honestly believe in 70 years of research and development we have a 40% effective flu shot but in 10 months we have a 95% effective rona shot?
#darwinism
The flu shot would/could be just as effective if we knew exactly which strain of flu was planning to circulate the following year. Instead they have to guess in time to ramp up production.
But don’t let facts get in the way of your conspiracy theories.
No one is talking about conspiracy theories. But somehow that’s always the first resort when you Einsteins don’t have any substance to add. Funny though, how the world bank knew about covid 19 in March 2018 as per the internal documents that a brave soul leaked. What’s even funnier however, is the new “movie” called songbird coming next month. About covid23 and all its predictive programming that is not subliminal at all.
Please line up for the next dose.
Movies take 1-2 years between hiring actors, filing, editing, etc
They’ve been filming this movie before covid was actually a thing. Let that sink in.
Anonymous
12/03/2020 20:07
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you honestly believe in 70 years of research and development we have a 40% effective flu shot but in 10 months we have a 95% effective rona shot?
#darwinism
You need to go back and read about how the flu virus is different from other viruses we vaccinate against, such as measles or chickenpox. Also add to your reading list the vaccine development process so you can understand why it normally takes so long, and why the covid vaccine development was able to be accelerated.
Ignore the looney pp spouting Parler stuff.
Anonymous
12/03/2020 18:20
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Anonymous wrote:Do you honestly believe in 70 years of research and development we have a 40% effective flu shot but in 10 months we have a 95% effective rona shot?
#darwinism
You need to go back and read about how the flu virus is different from other viruses we vaccinate against, such as measles or chickenpox. Also add to your reading list the vaccine development process so you can understand why it normally takes so long, and why the covid vaccine development was able to be accelerated.
Anonymous
12/03/2020 18:17
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you honestly believe in 70 years of research and development we have a 40% effective flu shot but in 10 months we have a 95% effective rona shot?
#darwinism
The flu shot would/could be just as effective if we knew exactly which strain of flu was planning to circulate the following year. Instead they have to guess in time to ramp up production.
But don’t let facts get in the way of your conspiracy theories.
No one is talking about conspiracy theories. But somehow that’s always the first resort when you Einsteins don’t have any substance to add. Funny though, how the world bank knew about covid 19 in March 2018 as per the internal documents that a brave soul leaked. What’s even funnier however, is the new “movie” called songbird coming next month. About covid23 and all its predictive programming that is not subliminal at all.
Please line up for the next dose.
Anonymous
12/03/2020 16:32
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you honestly believe in 70 years of research and development we have a 40% effective flu shot but in 10 months we have a 95% effective rona shot?
#darwinism
The flu shot would/could be just as effective if we knew exactly which strain of flu was planning to circulate the following year. Instead they have to guess in time to ramp up production.
But don’t let facts get in the way of your conspiracy theories.
And the flu virus mutates more quickly and more significantly. It's like someone arguing that domestic cats and cougars should act the same because they're both felines.
Anonymous
12/03/2020 15:00
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Anonymous wrote:Do you honestly believe in 70 years of research and development we have a 40% effective flu shot but in 10 months we have a 95% effective rona shot?
#darwinism
The flu shot would/could be just as effective if we knew exactly which strain of flu was planning to circulate the following year. Instead they have to guess in time to ramp up production.
But don’t let facts get in the way of your conspiracy theories.
Anonymous
12/03/2020 14:32
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Do you honestly believe in 70 years of research and development we have a 40% effective flu shot but in 10 months we have a 95% effective rona shot?
#darwinism
#darwinism
Anonymous
12/03/2020 08:25
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There have only been 2 cases of school spread in K-2 since Oct 27. That is impressive and shows what can be accomplished.
I am very pleased with the general safety of the way LCPS is doing hybrid. I do think that needs to come with a caveat that there are two known, tracked cases of transmission K-2. If someone was positive but asymptomatic, there is no way to track the spread (and the estimate is, what, 50% of cases are asymptomatic?).
Perhaps. But the vast vast majority of positive cases reported to LCPS do not even have any close contacts within the school who are required to quarantine.
That’s because most aren’t even in back in yet. Until Tuesday it was k-2 and sped.
No. Close contacts are not determined based on the age of the person. Close contacts are determined based upon whether or not protocols are followed. There is no reason to think protocols will not continue to be followed. The few instances where a staffer had a close contact, it was most often another adult! If the rules are followed, it’s safe.
Anonymous
12/03/2020 04:51
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There have only been 2 cases of school spread in K-2 since Oct 27. That is impressive and shows what can be accomplished.
I am very pleased with the general safety of the way LCPS is doing hybrid. I do think that needs to come with a caveat that there are two known, tracked cases of transmission K-2. If someone was positive but asymptomatic, there is no way to track the spread (and the estimate is, what, 50% of cases are asymptomatic?).
Perhaps. But the vast vast majority of positive cases reported to LCPS do not even have any close contacts within the school who are required to quarantine.
That’s because most aren’t even in back in yet. Until Tuesday it was k-2 and sped.
Anonymous
12/02/2020 23:01
Subject: Re:Is LCPS doing that concurrent foolishness?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There have only been 2 cases of school spread in K-2 since Oct 27. That is impressive and shows what can be accomplished.
I am very pleased with the general safety of the way LCPS is doing hybrid. I do think that needs to come with a caveat that there are two known, tracked cases of transmission K-2. If someone was positive but asymptomatic, there is no way to track the spread (and the estimate is, what, 50% of cases are asymptomatic?).
Perhaps. But the vast vast majority of positive cases reported to LCPS do not even have any close contacts within the school who are required to quarantine.
Source? Your a$$hole is not a valid one.
Sigh. The school board. It’s pretty clear you are troll who doesn’t live in Loudoun because you seem woefully uninformed. But don’t let published facts get in the way of your trolling!