Anonymous wrote:Twenty pages of internal deliberations and executive privilege not invoked. Why?
Anonymous wrote:Twenty pages of internal deliberations and executive privilege not invoked. Why?
Anonymous wrote:The leaking on the left is so predictable...
Anonymous wrote:The leaking on the left is so predictable...
Anonymous wrote:The leaking on the left is so predictable...
Anonymous wrote:The leaking on the left is so predictable...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I bet Nancy knew about the book when she held on to the impeachment. The timing is pretty suspect--especially with SOU next week. Just like with Kavanaugh. Save the "best" for last.
The timing of the book would have no bearing on the timing of the trial. Regardless of when, Bolton would have to make himself available to the Senate trial. He was never going to stonewall them, then turn around and say it in a book months after the trial. Doing that would be the ultimate f-u to America. Either you keep the secret or you don't.
Anonymous wrote:I bet Nancy knew about the book when she held on to the impeachment. The timing is pretty suspect--especially with SOU next week. Just like with Kavanaugh. Save the "best" for last.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I am curious as to how NYT got the entire book, when both House prosecutors and White House defense were unaware of its exact contents.
It's been sitting on Trump's desk since Dec. 30.
Someone in the White House leaked it.
Bolton team is accusing that WH made copies of it and circulated...
I love that there are moles in the WH.
Anonymous wrote:John Kelly needs to step up. All of the former officials need to step up.
Anonymous wrote:John Kelly needs to step up. All of the former officials need to step up.
Anonymous wrote:I bet Nancy knew about the book when she held on to the impeachment. The timing is pretty BRILLIANT -especially with SOU next week. Just like with Kavanaugh. Save the "best" for last.