Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why won't Schiff release the transcripts of these interviews/depositions?
What is he hiding?

You don’t want to see them. You want to stop them. They will more than confirm the extortion that Trump, Giuliani, Sondland, Volker have already admitted. The Republicans don’t want a transparent investigation. They want to shut down the investigation.

Release the transcripts. Now.
Schiff won't because they don't fit his narrative.

PP’s labeling you guys “braindead zombies” is right on.

Us brain dead zombie heads, aka voters, would like to witness the testimony. If you are so secure in your knowledge that you can prove your theory, why not let us voters witness the investigation? The public supports police officers wear body cams when they enforce the law. Why does House leadership think they aren't accountable to the public?

Try growing a brain. It will help in a lot of ways.

NP. Translation: I support body cams so have no idea how to flip the truth around. I will insult the poster instead”

We watched the people going in for the depositions. That's equivalent to your "body cameras".

Police interviews aren't televised. Nor should they be.

They aren't? They are on tv shows frequently. Every jurisdiction is different, of course, and those being interviewed are mirandized, no? They have the right to counsel. This seems like a secret court proceeding to me. Maybe I'm not as smart as you think you are but, I can identify the multiple attempts to steal my vote for president.

People... this person has got to be a troll, pulling your chain. If not, then you PP are indeed not smart, not even a tiny bit.

You clearly don't understand the difference between an eye witness testimony and testimony from a suspect. Witnesses are not mirandized you dumba$$. You have zero understanding of our constitution which makes you either a troll or really ignorant.

Please show us what jurisdiction allows for police interviews to be televised while the investigation is on going. We will wait.......

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why won't Schiff release the transcripts of these interviews/depositions?
What is he hiding?

You don’t want to see them. You want to stop them. They will more than confirm the extortion that Trump, Giuliani, Sondland, Volker have already admitted. The Republicans don’t want a transparent investigation. They want to shut down the investigation.

Release the transcripts. Now.
Schiff won't because they don't fit his narrative.

PP’s labeling you guys “braindead zombies” is right on.

Us brain dead zombie heads, aka voters, would like to witness the testimony. If you are so secure in your knowledge that you can prove your theory, why not let us voters witness the investigation? The public supports police officers wear body cams when they enforce the law. Why does House leadership think they aren't accountable to the public?

Try growing a brain. It will help in a lot of ways.

NP. Translation: I support body cams so have no idea how to flip the truth around. I will insult the poster instead”

We watched the people going in for the depositions. That's equivalent to your "body cameras".

Police interviews aren't televised. Nor should they be.

They aren't? They are on tv shows frequently. Every jurisdiction is different, of course, and those being interviewed are mirandized, no? They have the right to counsel. This seems like a secret court proceeding to me. Maybe I'm not as smart as you think you are but, I can identify the multiple attempts to steal my vote for president.

Live, televised police interviews? Huh?

Do you mean on Law & Order? That’s not real.

OMG.. maybe the ^PP is a Russian troll, and turned on American tv one day, and saw Law & Order on the tv and thought it was the real deal, kind of like how when foreign countries think an Onion article is real. That is too funny.

Not law and order for goodness sake but, keep making up your BS narratives that have served you so well. Everything that humiliates and demeans the country is hilarious to you. Have a nice day.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the Republicans are doing is showing how utterly terrified they are by the impeachment investigation.

You literally do not understand the nation's conscience when you think it's totally cool to disenfranchise millions of voters by attempting to impeach because of a narrative you refuse to show the public.

You are seeking to depose a duly elected President of the United States of America behind closed doors. What did you think was going to happen?

That is not what is happening. The impeachment will be public. Relax and change your news source.

Idk...discovery doesn't seem to apply in this situation. I haven't been watching news lately because I prefer reading source documents. I looked for them in the Congressional Record and nada. This is still America, right?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why won't Schiff release the transcripts of these interviews/depositions?
What is he hiding?

You don’t want to see them. You want to stop them. They will more than confirm the extortion that Trump, Giuliani, Sondland, Volker have already admitted. The Republicans don’t want a transparent investigation. They want to shut down the investigation.

Release the transcripts. Now.
Schiff won't because they don't fit his narrative.

PP’s labeling you guys “braindead zombies” is right on.

Us brain dead zombie heads, aka voters, would like to witness the testimony. If you are so secure in your knowledge that you can prove your theory, why not let us voters witness the investigation? The public supports police officers wear body cams when they enforce the law. Why does House leadership think they aren't accountable to the public?

Try growing a brain. It will help in a lot of ways.

NP. Translation: I support body cams so have no idea how to flip the truth around. I will insult the poster instead”

We watched the people going in for the depositions. That's equivalent to your "body cameras".

Police interviews aren't televised. Nor should they be.

They aren't? They are on tv shows frequently. Every jurisdiction is different, of course, and those being interviewed are mirandized, no? They have the right to counsel. This seems like a secret court proceeding to me. Maybe I'm not as smart as you think you are but, I can identify the multiple attempts to steal my vote for president.

Live, televised police interviews? Huh?

Do you mean on Law & Order? That’s not real.

OMG.. maybe the ^PP is a Russian troll, and turned on American tv one day, and saw Law & Order on the tv and thought it was the real deal, kind of like how when foreign countries think an Onion article is real. That is too funny.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge Napolitano on Fox News said that Chairman Schiff is following House rules and the Republicans should show respect for the process. The Fox News host immediately jumped in asking ’their rules - don’t they make the rules’ (meaning the Democrats). To which Judge Napolitano answered that actually they cannot just make up rules and they are following rules that were instituted in 2015 by a Republican held House and signed by John boehner

I am paraphrasing

Go turn on Fox News, MAGAs - maybe you will learn something there after all.

Fox is a liberal bastion. OANN is where it's at.

This is an oxymoron and/or ironic given who is behind the network.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Judge Napolitano on Fox News said that Chairman Schiff is following House rules and the Republicans should show respect for the process. The Fox News host immediately jumped in asking ’their rules - don’t they make the rules’ (meaning the Democrats). To which Judge Napolitano answered that actually they cannot just make up rules and they are following rules that were instituted in 2015 by a Republican held House and signed by John boehner

I am paraphrasing

Go turn on Fox News, MAGAs - maybe you will learn something there after all.

Fox is a liberal bastion. OANN is where it's at.

Anonymous wrote:Judge Napolitano on Fox News said that Chairman Schiff is following House rules and the Republicans should show respect for the process. The Fox News host immediately jumped in asking ’their rules - don’t they make the rules’ (meaning the Democrats). To which Judge Napolitano answered that actually they cannot just make up rules and they are following rules that were instituted in 2015 by a Republican held House and signed by John boehner

I am paraphrasing

Go turn on Fox News, MAGAs - maybe you will learn something there after all.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why won't Schiff release the transcripts of these interviews/depositions?
What is he hiding?

You don’t want to see them. You want to stop them. They will more than confirm the extortion that Trump, Giuliani, Sondland, Volker have already admitted. The Republicans don’t want a transparent investigation. They want to shut down the investigation.

Release the transcripts. Now.
Schiff won't because they don't fit his narrative.

That is delusional. They will come out when the investigation is complete, as is appropriate. Trump admitted the narrative. Giuliani admitted the narrative. Sondland admitted the narrative. Volker produced the receipts. Yovanovitch, Hill, and Taylor are rock-solid witnesses to the extortion scheme. How is all of that not obvious?

But it’s not appropriate. Not taking a full house vote is very unusual.

Presidents committing crimes is very unusual, too. Impeachment is very unusual. All of this is very unusual.

Understatement of the year.

Isn’t it though? It’s also unusual to call for an impeachment before a President is even seated, and furthermore, to accuse a President of having Russia hack votes for a win.

It's unusual that the Russians actually influenced our election, per the R controlled Senate IC. It's also unusual for a POTUS to violate ethics laws numerous times; make money for his businesses by funneling government related business his way.. yes, unusual times.

Exactly.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why won't Schiff release the transcripts of these interviews/depositions?
What is he hiding?

You don’t want to see them. You want to stop them. They will more than confirm the extortion that Trump, Giuliani, Sondland, Volker have already admitted. The Republicans don’t want a transparent investigation. They want to shut down the investigation.

Release the transcripts. Now.
Schiff won't because they don't fit his narrative.

PP’s labeling you guys “braindead zombies” is right on.

Us brain dead zombie heads, aka voters, would like to witness the testimony. If you are so secure in your knowledge that you can prove your theory, why not let us voters witness the investigation? The public supports police officers wear body cams when they enforce the law. Why does House leadership think they aren't accountable to the public?

Try growing a brain. It will help in a lot of ways.

NP. Translation: I support body cams so have no idea how to flip the truth around. I will insult the poster instead”

We watched the people going in for the depositions. That's equivalent to your "body cameras".

Police interviews aren't televised. Nor should they be.

They aren't? They are on tv shows frequently. Every jurisdiction is different, of course, and those being interviewed are mirandized, no? They have the right to counsel. This seems like a secret court proceeding to me. Maybe I'm not as smart as you think you are but, I can identify the multiple attempts to steal my vote for president.

A) you see police interviews on TV after the investigation is over.
B) the person being interviewed by the police has the right to counsel in that interview. The person being interviewed’s boss, or the company he or she works for, does not have the right to counsel in that interview.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why won't Schiff release the transcripts of these interviews/depositions?
What is he hiding?

You don’t want to see them. You want to stop them. They will more than confirm the extortion that Trump, Giuliani, Sondland, Volker have already admitted. The Republicans don’t want a transparent investigation. They want to shut down the investigation.

Release the transcripts. Now.
Schiff won't because they don't fit his narrative.

PP’s labeling you guys “braindead zombies” is right on.

Us brain dead zombie heads, aka voters, would like to witness the testimony. If you are so secure in your knowledge that you can prove your theory, why not let us voters witness the investigation? The public supports police officers wear body cams when they enforce the law. Why does House leadership think they aren't accountable to the public?

Try growing a brain. It will help in a lot of ways.

NP. Translation: I support body cams so have no idea how to flip the truth around. I will insult the poster instead”

We watched the people going in for the depositions. That's equivalent to your "body cameras".

Police interviews aren't televised. Nor should they be.

They aren't? They are on tv shows frequently. Every jurisdiction is different, of course, and those being interviewed are mirandized, no? They have the right to counsel. This seems like a secret court proceeding to me. Maybe I'm not as smart as you think you are but, I can identify the multiple attempts to steal my vote for president.

Live, televised police interviews? Huh?

Do you mean on Law & Order? That’s not real.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why won't Schiff release the transcripts of these interviews/depositions?
What is he hiding?

You don’t want to see them. You want to stop them. They will more than confirm the extortion that Trump, Giuliani, Sondland, Volker have already admitted. The Republicans don’t want a transparent investigation. They want to shut down the investigation.

Release the transcripts. Now.
Schiff won't because they don't fit his narrative.

PP’s labeling you guys “braindead zombies” is right on.

Us brain dead zombie heads, aka voters, would like to witness the testimony. If you are so secure in your knowledge that you can prove your theory, why not let us voters witness the investigation? The public supports police officers wear body cams when they enforce the law. Why does House leadership think they aren't accountable to the public?

Try growing a brain. It will help in a lot of ways.

NP. Translation: I support body cams so have no idea how to flip the truth around. I will insult the poster instead”

We watched the people going in for the depositions. That's equivalent to your "body cameras".

Police interviews aren't televised. Nor should they be.

They aren't? They are on tv shows frequently. Every jurisdiction is different, of course, and those being interviewed are mirandized, no? They have the right to counsel. This seems like a secret court proceeding to me. Maybe I'm not as smart as you think you are but, I can identify the multiple attempts to steal my vote for president.

Stop being a freaking baby. There are consequences to law breaking. We all have to face them. So does Trump. Be angry at him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All the Republicans are doing is showing how utterly terrified they are by the impeachment investigation.

You literally do not understand the nation's conscience when you think it's totally cool to disenfranchise millions of voters by attempting to impeach because of a narrative you refuse to show the public.

You are seeking to depose a duly elected President of the United States of America behind closed doors. What did you think was going to happen?

That is not what is happening. The impeachment will be public. Relax and change your news source.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why won't Schiff release the transcripts of these interviews/depositions?
What is he hiding?

You don’t want to see them. You want to stop them. They will more than confirm the extortion that Trump, Giuliani, Sondland, Volker have already admitted. The Republicans don’t want a transparent investigation. They want to shut down the investigation.

Release the transcripts. Now.
Schiff won't because they don't fit his narrative.

PP’s labeling you guys “braindead zombies” is right on.

Us brain dead zombie heads, aka voters, would like to witness the testimony. If you are so secure in your knowledge that you can prove your theory, why not let us voters witness the investigation? The public supports police officers wear body cams when they enforce the law. Why does House leadership think they aren't accountable to the public?

Try growing a brain. It will help in a lot of ways.

NP. Translation: I support body cams so have no idea how to flip the truth around. I will insult the poster instead”

We watched the people going in for the depositions. That's equivalent to your "body cameras".

Police interviews aren't televised. Nor should they be.

They aren't? They are on tv shows frequently. Every jurisdiction is different, of course, and those being interviewed are mirandized, no? They have the right to counsel. This seems like a secret court proceeding to me. Maybe I'm not as smart as you think you are but, I can identify the multiple attempts to steal my vote for president.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why won't Schiff release the transcripts of these interviews/depositions?
What is he hiding?

You don’t want to see them. You want to stop them. They will more than confirm the extortion that Trump, Giuliani, Sondland, Volker have already admitted. The Republicans don’t want a transparent investigation. They want to shut down the investigation.

Release the transcripts. Now.
Schiff won't because they don't fit his narrative.

No, he won’t because there are still upcoming witnesses and he doesn’t want them to tailor their testimony to what’s already been testified to.

Oh, please. That is such a BS excuse.
Most of these "witnesses'" opening statements have already been made public. The public knows what they have said due to leaks.
Why can't we see the questions that were asked and their responses? Because..... they don't fit Schiff's narrative.
The Democrats learned from the Mueller testimony that open hearings don't work in their favor. Simple solution - make everything secretive.

DP.. you are a moron if you think an opening statement is the entire sum of a person's testimony. Investigations are always private, whether in the government or the local police.

Notice how when local police are investigating a crime they don't make every statement they gather public right then and there. Any junior law enforcement person would tell you that.

What happens when the suspect asks for a lawyer during interrogation? The police must STOP their interrogation. Due process

Trump is not the one being questioned at the moment. Has anyone being questioned been denied access to lawyer? The suspect can't tell witnesses to not testify, but in this case, Trump has done just that.

Also.. as a Trumpster, you really shouldn't be talking about "due process" ... "lock her up"... remember that chant?

Anonymous wrote:Unauthorized access to a SCIF is a federal crime.

This. If accessed the one in my building I could (would) go to jail.