Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She only looks good because the woman next to her has no neck. I don't think that dress is becoming at all.

It looks better than Kate’s by a mile. They’re both wearing white too. To be a fly on the wall in that room!

I disagree. Kate looks regal. This woman looks like she walked in from Forever 21.

I’d say Rose has that Carolyn Bessette Kennedy elegance about her. The dress isn’t wearing her, she’s the focus and it’s gorgrous. She was born to wealth and blue bloods - the regal air without the tiara is incredible.

+1 Less is more. Rose looks smashing and what most men would swoon for.

I have to keep reminding myself that DCUM isn’t diverse bc this statement is only true for a certain group of men.

Anonymous wrote:
They both look good in their own way, and it largely has to do with their body type, so it's not as if a dress change would fix anything. Rose has an elongated frame, and this will always make her look elegant, provided she doesn't stoop. Kate has a lovely figure, and I think she looks handsome, but nothing about her is striking. This is a good look for a future Queen - she looks like Everywoman (only better looking than average).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at #1 on Britain's most popular list.

Then look at #10.

https://www.tatler.com/gallery/social-power-index-2019

Tatler is run by Middleton friends. Hence why they published a recent profile on James Middleton that no one asked for.

That’s a very flattering photo they used of Rose.

What kind of friends highlight the mistress? They ran two profiles of Rose in the space of a month.

https://www.tatler.com/article/who-is-rose-hanbury-the-marchioness-of-cholmondeley

https://www.tatler.com/article/rose-hanbury-attends-state-banquet

I doubt she was looking for the press.....

*that* kind of friend.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at #1 on Britain's most popular list.

Then look at #10.

https://www.tatler.com/gallery/social-power-index-2019

Tatler is run by Middleton friends. Hence why they published a recent profile on James Middleton that no one asked for.

That’s a very flattering photo they used of Rose.

What kind of friends highlight the mistress? They ran two profiles of Rose in the space of a month.

https://www.tatler.com/article/who-is-rose-hanbury-the-marchioness-of-cholmondeley

https://www.tatler.com/article/rose-hanbury-attends-state-banquet

Anonymous wrote:I personally am loving this bit from the Sun article:

"According to one friend, David could instantly see that Rose “was the girl who could give him the family he needed”.

Six years later they were engaged. They married the very next day, with Rose’s mother revealing her daughter was expecting."

That's a lot of instants!

The article also says as good as outright that he is gay suspect. What straight man buys a house with a close male friend and remains "extremely close" to him?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at #1 on Britain's most popular list.

Then look at #10.

https://www.tatler.com/gallery/social-power-index-2019

Tatler is run by Middleton friends. Hence why they published a recent profile on James Middleton that no one asked for.

That’s a very flattering photo they used of Rose.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If not Rose then it will be someone else. All these princes have mistresses.

Who is Harry's mistress?