Anonymous wrote:As a parent of a rising 9th grader, I would be devastated if she doesn't get her first choice in the college admission process. She is smart enough to ALWAYS get her first choice so it won't be a stretch for her advisor. I am glad the school made the change now. They still have three years to make sure all the money we invested will send her on the way to her dreams.
Anonymous wrote:As a parent of a rising 9th grader, I would be devastated if she doesn't get her first choice in the college admission process. She is smart enough to ALWAYS get her first choice so it won't be a stretch for her advisor. I am glad the school made the change now. They still have three years to make sure all the money we invested will send her on the way to her dreams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you are the top 25% of your class you will get decent counseling from the school Jr and Sr year, as well the top athletes with OK grades.
Everyone else will get the small SLAC (esp boys), U of Vermont, and Elon pitch.
As a Sidwell parent with a not-top-of-the-class kid this gives me chills
This should not give you chills. If so, you’re delusional. If your child is not near the top of the class, the Sidwell name alone is not going to get your child into a TOP school. Sidwell will get your child into a mid level school that he/she is probably still not qualified for. So that’s what you’re paying for. The chance to get into a mid level SLAC or U Vermont etc. because your average kid coming from your local public might be lucky to get into Towson.
Sorry, I was not clear. I'm in no way delusional. The part that I find relatively upsetting is the implication that if you're not in the top 25% of class, you won't get decent counseling from the school. Did I misunderstand that? Believe me, I know my kid's limitations.
Anonymous wrote:Guess Bryan Garman is going to continue to ingore the parents. Unless you have a place in Martha's Vineyard.
Such a disappointment.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People are trying to say it obliquely yet others continue to suggest the problem is just parents with unrealistic demands. So to be direct: One of the college counseling staff turned out to be incompetent at his job, and the director insisted on keeping him on long after the problem was obvious to students, parents and other school staff.
That brings up more questions. Why was he keeping him in the job? Given the salary, did he think it will be hard to attract anyone else to replace him? Also, are the parents expectation aligned with the reality? If a kid is not fit/prepared for certain school then no matter how hard the counselors push he/she won't be accepted, I can understand after spending so much why some parents will be unwilling to hear that.
I don't think that is the issue. According to what some wrote earlier in the thread, the counselor in question sent recommendations that had grammatical errors etc. which obviously provides little confidence to the admissions staff reading it. I think most people understand that colleges are more selective today than 15 or 30 years ago and not everyone is groomed for Harvard.
Well, in this generation not everyone cares that much about classist and racist Harvard.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As someone who has worked in private schools, this thread is terrifying. Most people want to do a good job and want to find an employer who is a good fit. Most adults can tolerate constructure criticism too, even if it stings a little when we receive it. But threads like this are the professional equivalent of a burn book. Who would sign up for that, particularly if you don’t exactly get rich doing it? Yikes.
If one is competent at the job, there are no issues. It is clear there was a bad hire that has caused many issues for the department. With a clean slate, things will be better in the short term.
Anonymous wrote:As someone who has worked in private schools, this thread is terrifying. Most people want to do a good job and want to find an employer who is a good fit. Most adults can tolerate constructure criticism too, even if it stings a little when we receive it. But threads like this are the professional equivalent of a burn book. Who would sign up for that, particularly if you don’t exactly get rich doing it? Yikes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The general feeling about the departing counselors among many seniors and their parents seems to be “don’t let the door hit you on the way out!”
And you know because...
There have been juniors who have cried when they got assigned to the one counselor, because it was like drawing the short straw. SFS has to put those days behind it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The general feeling about the departing counselors among many seniors and their parents seems to be “don’t let the door hit you on the way out!”
And you know because...