Anonymous wrote:I think the "Final Thoughts" explains a lot this year.
"The identification of advanced academic potential must be grounded in an expanded understanding of intelligence that embraces diverse cultural, ethnic, and linguistic manifestations. A narrow definition of intelligence that is measured by how well children perform on assessments that require a knowledge of words and numbers learned in school precludes from participation in gifted programs certain populations of students who have not had the opportunity to attain this knowledge before coming to school. As we move from an understanding of intelligence as innate ability grounded in a cultural and social context tied to Western, affluent populations to an understanding of intelligence as a student’s evolving potential that is contextually-based and is nurtured through experience, we provide numerous possibilities for understanding giftedness as developing potential in a much broader range of students."
"embraces diverse cultural, ethnic, and linguistic manifestations"
"As we move from an understanding of intelligence as innate ability grounded in a cultural and social context tied to Western, affluent populations "... -->not taking as many Western, affluent children?
"contextually-based" = look at address, race, school?
Anonymous wrote:Our center is 4 feeder schools + the center school = 5. Is that not the norm?
Regardless, it had two very small 3rd AAP classes last year, but my child was not accepted this year despite having 3 Fs 1 C, and high in pool test scores. I don’t know any children at our school who were admitted. We are about 50% FARMs/ELL kids.
So I don’t think your theory is correct.
Anonymous wrote:“Six professionals with different areas of expertise” and 4/6 yeses to get level 4 is different this year, isn’t it?
Anonymous wrote:https://www.fcps.edu/node/32650
Read this. Talks about four reviewers this year
Need for context and mentions culture
And says 120+ screened for level iii
Never remember reading this years ago. I believe it's new
Anonymous wrote:How do you get an 11 with the F,C,O format?