Anonymous wrote:If Arlington adds another DA team, where are all of the teams going to find field space to practice?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For example, here is the Arlington U12 age groups for both boys and girls:
BOYS:
DA
Red
White
Blue
Black
Silver
6 Teams
GIRLS:
Red
White
Blue
Black
Silver
Gold
6 Teams
Having a Boys DA team at U12 did not add another boys team. Understand this and you will be fine.
In the DA, the U12 age group consists of 2 teams of 9v9. It's the same at every club. That's just the way the DA is structured. That's why Arlington's U12 DA roster has 28 players, which is 14 per team for 2 teams of 9v9 (http://asas.ussoccerda.com/sam/teams/index.php?team=7401056).
So there are actually 7 boys teams and 6 girls teams in that age group.
Helps to have your facts straight before you decide to get snarky.
26 players as part of a player pool that will get knocked down to the 20 or so players at U13. They are only treated as two teams on game day simply because it is 9v9.
Please point to me the "two teams" you speak of according to US Soccer:
http://asas.ussoccerda.com/sam/teams/index.php?team=7401056
LOL, you are hopeless.
There are 28 (not 26) players that train as an academy. On game days they have two rosters of 14 each. The rosters are fluid from week to week to allow for player movement between teams. The reality is as the previous poster said, that is the equivalent of 2 teams. Treating them as one as part of your field space math is asinine.
Are you really claiming the U12 DA with it's 28 players gets the same field space per week as the 14 players on the U12 Red team? Of course not. The U12 DA gets the same as the U12 Red + U12 White combined.
Anonymous wrote:Instead of crying about DA, maybe you should be crying about the fact that ASA has the nerve to have 6-7 travel teams in one age group.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For example, here is the Arlington U12 age groups for both boys and girls:
BOYS:
DA
Red
White
Blue
Black
Silver
6 Teams
GIRLS:
Red
White
Blue
Black
Silver
Gold
6 Teams
Having a Boys DA team at U12 did not add another boys team. Understand this and you will be fine.
In the DA, the U12 age group consists of 2 teams of 9v9. It's the same at every club. That's just the way the DA is structured. That's why Arlington's U12 DA roster has 28 players, which is 14 per team for 2 teams of 9v9 (http://asas.ussoccerda.com/sam/teams/index.php?team=7401056).
So there are actually 7 boys teams and 6 girls teams in that age group.
Helps to have your facts straight before you decide to get snarky.
26 players as part of a player pool that will get knocked down to the 20 or so players at U13. They are only treated as two teams on game day simply because it is 9v9.
Please point to me the "two teams" you speak of according to US Soccer:
http://asas.ussoccerda.com/sam/teams/index.php?team=7401056
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For example, here is the Arlington U12 age groups for both boys and girls:
BOYS:
DA
Red
White
Blue
Black
Silver
6 Teams
GIRLS:
Red
White
Blue
Black
Silver
Gold
6 Teams
Having a Boys DA team at U12 did not add another boys team. Understand this and you will be fine.
In the DA, the U12 age group consists of 2 teams of 9v9. It's the same at every club. That's just the way the DA is structured. That's why Arlington's U12 DA roster has 28 players, which is 14 per team for 2 teams of 9v9 (http://asas.ussoccerda.com/sam/teams/index.php?team=7401056).
So there are actually 7 boys teams and 6 girls teams in that age group.
Helps to have your facts straight before you decide to get snarky.
Anonymous wrote:U12 is a bad example to make your point because U12 Boys DA has 26 players. When they play games, there are 2 games, so in effect it is equivalent to two teams (hence they did add a team).
Also, look at practice field distribution. Six girls team use 1 field for practice. 5 Boys teams (non-DA) use 1 field for practice. DA uses a half field for practice (maybe it's a full field, but it's at least a half). So by adding DA, ASA needed to add a minimum of a half field per U12 practice session.
Anonymous wrote:For example, here is the Arlington U12 age groups for both boys and girls:
BOYS:
DA
Red
White
Blue
Black
Silver
6 Teams
GIRLS:
Red
White
Blue
Black
Silver
Gold
6 Teams
Having a Boys DA team at U12 did not add another boys team. Understand this and you will be fine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With partial boys and girls DA, without any DA, or with full DA, the # of travel players ASA serves is all going to be very similar. It is built into the planning and budget. There will be more practices now with the coming full DA and future split age groups, and on premium field resources, then in the past, and this is the future FBOFW. Anyone saying otherwise is lieing to you. The lower travel, ADP, and rec players will be impacted.
For the sake of an honest conversation, let's stick to the facts. This is not a debate class.
5 teams x4 practices = 20 practices a week.
No amount of debate changes that.
7 teams x 3 practices = 21 practices a week.
No amount of debate changes that.
No, U13 - U19
With Full DA
5 teams 4x/week = 20 practices, 30 hours
16 teams 3x/week = 48 practices 72 hours
Total practices/week = 68
Total teams = 21
Total hours = 102/week
Without DA
Total Teams = 23
Total Practices/week = 69
Total Hours/week = 103
A full DA program will have robbed a grand total of 1 whole hour per week across all DA eligible age groups.
No one is arguing the basic math, but I think your basic assumption about the number of teams is wrong, for a couple of reasons. First, why would Arlington drop a team in the combined age group? For next year we are talking 04-03, which will be the U16/17 age group in DA in the 2019-20 season. Currently, on the boys side Arlington has four 04 teams (DA + Red-Blue-White), and three 03 teams (Red-Blue-White). When they take the best of the 04DA and 03Red teams to make the 04/03 DA team, what happens to the rest of those players? Most of the ones who don't make the cut will be 04s, but the club won't want to lose them because they'll need them to move back up to the DA team during their U17 year. So they'll move them to 04 Red, push some Red to White, and some White to Blue. So you're saying on top of all this they're going to drop the Blue team entirely? Sorry but I just don't see any reason why they would do that. So at a minimum you would have 6 travel teams in the 04 and 03 age groups, the same number as there are U16 & U17 teams now.
The second factor you are missing is the number of players who will come or stay at Arlington just because of the DA. For example, the boys 04 team only has 3 of its 18 players who are actually from Arlington. If the 03s get DA status (again) next year, they will attract more players to the program. Beyond a doubt not all of the existing 03 Red players will make the 03/04 DA team. So what will they do if they have enough paying players to fill the DA plus Red-White-Blue travel teams next year? Turn them away? I don't think so. More likely they will end up with one U16-17 DA team, and then Red-White-Blue in both age groups.
A look at the existing age groups shows that the effect of the DA has been to add another team above and on top of the existing travel structure, rather than replace one. The boys U12s have DA + 5 travel teams. U13s are DA + 4. U14s and U15s are each DA + 3. They don't go down to 3 teams until after the DA ages. For the girls in the DA age groups (U13-U15) it is DA + 3, then it drops to 2 teams at the non-DA ages.
Bottom line is that getting DA status grows a travel program, it doesn't shrink it.
A DA program attracts more talented players but it does not mean the actual number of teams will increase.