.Anonymous wrote:
What month do the royals tend to announce pregnancies? She must be past the 12 week mark if she is showing already.
There isn't a 'set' month. It's dependent on the couple. Kate and William tried to wait on their first but a nurse managed to blab her condition (and illness) to the public when two radio jockeys tricked her into thinking it was the FREAKING QUEEN on the line.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/kate-middl...nurse-falls-for-hoax-call.html
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/kate-middl...ich-led-to-nurses-suicide.html
Basically everyone knew Kate was pregnant at 8 weeks. And that continued for each pregnancy.
I think Meghan might announce in October (near her 16-day tour of Australia, New Zealand, etc) because A) She's able to work through her pregnancy (clearly), and B) Its her first - so I think she's treasuring the 'secret'

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm the op. Told ya so!
You did! Great call!!
Anonymous wrote:She is going to be a place where Zika is a concern. They claim they have spoken with doctors, but still, just because you are royal does not mean you are immune from tragedy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was nice they waited to make the announcement until after Beatrice’s wedding.
It was Eugenie's wedding but agree that it was nice that they waited. She seems healthy and energetic even after touching down in Australia.
So Harry’s children further bump E&B down the line for the crown, right?
Yep! More of a concern for Andrew their father though. He’s about to become #8 in line for the throne.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was nice they waited to make the announcement until after Beatrice’s wedding.
It was Eugenie's wedding but agree that it was nice that they waited. She seems healthy and energetic even after touching down in Australia.
So Harry’s children further bump E&B down the line for the crown, right?
Yep! More of a concern for Andrew their father though. He’s about to become #8 in line for the throne.
Anonymous wrote:I'm the op. Told ya so!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't she kind of old for this? What is she, close to 40?
Among the wealthy, child-bearing can occur later because there are resources $$ to bring up the baby. Also, she is a very youthful 37!
I’m not wealthy or look particularly youngish but I easily got pregnant with my first at 37 and my second at 39. The kids are healthy and thriving. The thing with fertility is that you can’t tell what’s going on inside by what things look like on the outside
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was nice they waited to make the announcement until after Beatrice’s wedding.
It was Eugenie's wedding but agree that it was nice that they waited. She seems healthy and energetic even after touching down in Australia.
So Harry’s children further bump E&B down the line for the crown, right?
Yep! More of a concern for Andrew their father though. He’s about to become #8 in line for the throne.
Anonymous wrote:I'm hoping for one of each! A ginger lassie and a son like the cellist at their wedding...

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Isn't she kind of old for this? What is she, close to 40?
Go away, jealous harpy!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was nice they waited to make the announcement until after Beatrice’s wedding.
It was Eugenie's wedding but agree that it was nice that they waited. She seems healthy and energetic even after touching down in Australia.
So Harry’s children further bump E&B down the line for the crown, right?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It was nice they waited to make the announcement until after Beatrice’s wedding.
It was Eugenie's wedding but agree that it was nice that they waited. She seems healthy and energetic even after touching down in Australia.