Anonymous wrote:To the 2 posters debating the "if only our best athletes played soccer" topic: please get off this thread. This is supposed to be about travel tryouts coming up this Spring, not a place for general soccer-related discussion. Please consider starting a new thread if you want to continue that converation.
Thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:McLean tryouts: http://www.mcleansoccer.org/Travel_Tryouts
Girls tryouts start Sunday and the club hasn't even told us the coaching list. How can that be? They require 24 hour advance registration, but they should at least tell us the coach list when we are less then 48 hrs away!
Nutso. Is this because of the coming departure of the TD?
List of coaches is here:
http://www.mcleansoccer.org/travel_staff_2017
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:asksoccernova wrote:There's a reason I didn't try to go play their sport... because it doesn't cross over. That's my point here - athleticism does not mean you are good at another sport. With all the athleticism that a soccer player has, you still can't dribble a basketball well or shoot accurately.
My point here is that the motor skills required to play soccer and other team sports do not cross over very well. The closest thing out there is NFL kickers.
This is why the American audience doesn't appreciate or understand the sport as much, the thought process behind it is different - it's a totally different game than the sports most people have grown up with.
If you don't think the skills required to play football, basketball, hockey, etc. Translate to soccer directly then I'm sorry to say that you simply are not a top level athlete and you have apparently never had the chance to spend time with one to discuss how sports work in their world. There's a reason Alexi Lalas was great at hockey, Steve Nash started as a serious soccer player, Rafael Nadal could have played pro soccer and Odell Beckham Junior could have played national team soccer. There's even a reason Tim Tebow is making a legit run at baseball. Great athletes are great athletes! They choose to train at a select sport because of interests, body types, family pressures, environment, opportunities and future aspirations. But apart from the bobby Hurley/Michael Bradley types who worked tirelessly and had a serious coach dad, I can almost guarantee that most world classs athletes at some point had to chose what they wanted to work toward dominating.
To put it another way. If Allen iverson or Dion Sanders grew with Bob Bradley as a dad, I'm 100% confident they would have been the best soccer players the US has ever produced- even while playing other sports.
The problem is you are still using a stopwatch, a ruler and a scale as your metrics. Would the US have spotted Messi or Cryuff? Because our sports require size and speed we tend to apply that to soccer when it doesn't. Until Jordan grew he was relegated to JV at his High School. That says all you need to know about how we select our athletes.
But, lets play along. Even if Dion Sanders picked up soccer at 13 today there is no chance that he becomes a world class talent. Even Dion Sanders would have had to start playing soccer at 5 like Messi did. Athleticism cannot overcome the thousands and thousands of touches required to have world class technical skill.
Do you think Messi is not fast and quick? Messi is one of the fastest and quickest players playing. Messi is an elite athlete. If Dion Sanders grow up in Argentina? The point is soccer in the US does not get the Messi. Anyways back to tryouts.
Anonymous wrote:McLean tryouts: http://www.mcleansoccer.org/Travel_Tryouts
Girls tryouts start Sunday and the club hasn't even told us the coaching list. How can that be? They require 24 hour advance registration, but they should at least tell us the coach list when we are less then 48 hrs away!
Nutso. Is this because of the coming departure of the TD?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:asksoccernova wrote:There's a reason I didn't try to go play their sport... because it doesn't cross over. That's my point here - athleticism does not mean you are good at another sport. With all the athleticism that a soccer player has, you still can't dribble a basketball well or shoot accurately.
My point here is that the motor skills required to play soccer and other team sports do not cross over very well. The closest thing out there is NFL kickers.
This is why the American audience doesn't appreciate or understand the sport as much, the thought process behind it is different - it's a totally different game than the sports most people have grown up with.
If you don't think the skills required to play football, basketball, hockey, etc. Translate to soccer directly then I'm sorry to say that you simply are not a top level athlete and you have apparently never had the chance to spend time with one to discuss how sports work in their world. There's a reason Alexi Lalas was great at hockey, Steve Nash started as a serious soccer player, Rafael Nadal could have played pro soccer and Odell Beckham Junior could have played national team soccer. There's even a reason Tim Tebow is making a legit run at baseball. Great athletes are great athletes! They choose to train at a select sport because of interests, body types, family pressures, environment, opportunities and future aspirations. But apart from the bobby Hurley/Michael Bradley types who worked tirelessly and had a serious coach dad, I can almost guarantee that most world classs athletes at some point had to chose what they wanted to work toward dominating.
To put it another way. If Allen iverson or Dion Sanders grew with Bob Bradley as a dad, I'm 100% confident they would have been the best soccer players the US has ever produced- even while playing other sports.
The problem is you are still using a stopwatch, a ruler and a scale as your metrics. Would the US have spotted Messi or Cryuff? Because our sports require size and speed we tend to apply that to soccer when it doesn't. Until Jordan grew he was relegated to JV at his High School. That says all you need to know about how we select our athletes.
But, lets play along. Even if Dion Sanders picked up soccer at 13 today there is no chance that he becomes a world class talent. Even Dion Sanders would have had to start playing soccer at 5 like Messi did. Athleticism cannot overcome the thousands and thousands of touches required to have world class technical skill.
Anonymous wrote:Any feedback on the boys side for FPYC. Thinking about checking it out for a U9
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Few coaches can afford coaching only one team!
FPYC has been great for us (U11 now). But it is a small club, with all the pros and cons that come along with that. Find out who the coach will be and go from there.
What are the pro and cons of a small club?..First time travel parent here.
p/
(IMO) Small Club Pros: More attention for your child. Less cost (due to less overhead/infrastructure). Better access to coaches and TD. More likely to move up/progress/develop. Small Club Cons: Less organized communications. Very coach/manager centric since small club won't have enough centralized staff to help. No direct path to DA (if your child is in the 0.1% who has a chance to go pro.). Small player pool (so if 1-2 players quit/leave, it can really hurt a team.)
Make sense. Another question..for the small clubs that just have one team at a particular age group does that mean they only roster enough kids for one team or only have enough interest at tryouts to make one team?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Few coaches can afford coaching only one team!
FPYC has been great for us (U11 now). But it is a small club, with all the pros and cons that come along with that. Find out who the coach will be and go from there.
What are the pro and cons of a small club?..First time travel parent here.
p/
(IMO) Small Club Pros: More attention for your child. Less cost (due to less overhead/infrastructure). Better access to coaches and TD. More likely to move up/progress/develop. Small Club Cons: Less organized communications. Very coach/manager centric since small club won't have enough centralized staff to help. No direct path to DA (if your child is in the 0.1% who has a chance to go pro.). Small player pool (so if 1-2 players quit/leave, it can really hurt a team.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Few coaches can afford coaching only one team!
FPYC has been great for us (U11 now). But it is a small club, with all the pros and cons that come along with that. Find out who the coach will be and go from there.
What are the pro and cons of a small club?..First time travel parent here.
Anonymous wrote:Few coaches can afford coaching only one team!
FPYC has been great for us (U11 now). But it is a small club, with all the pros and cons that come along with that. Find out who the coach will be and go from there.