Anonymous wrote:I guess she doesn't call blacks "predators" anymore now that she needs their votes.
Anonymous wrote:Why is she not killing him? He seem very rational and even tempered. Not racist or sexist or a bully.
Anonymous wrote:Are Trump supporters this stupid that they think that one person as SoS can impact tax policies? Or that one senator can do so alone? You know what it takes: a willingness to listen to the other side. Something many Republican congress people have stated that HRC would do; Trump, not so much.
Anonymous wrote:So when Trump says "law and order" is the solution to the problem, he means he wants to flood black neighborhoods with police that stop and frisk everyone?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went into this debate undecided and at this point I'm leaning towards trump. I think he has a point about Clinton has had X number of years to accomplish these things and she hasn't.
+1
You two must not know how the government works.
Trump thinks being POTUS means you can do whatever you want. He has no clue that the POTUS has to work with Congress.
So? You think Clinton will be able to work with congress? LOL You know the republicans are planning to not let any of her nominates to the floor. This means she will not get anyone on the court.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went into this debate undecided and at this point I'm leaning towards trump. I think he has a point about Clinton has had X number of years to accomplish these things and she hasn't.
+1
You two must not know how the government works.
Trump thinks being POTUS means you can do whatever you want. He has no clue that the POTUS has to work with Congress.
So? You think Clinton will be able to work with congress? LOL You know the republicans are planning to not let any of her nominates to the floor. This means she will not get anyone on the court.
And it's Clinton's fault that Republicans won't do their job? Sound logic.![]()
Anonymous wrote:The dumbs who vote for Trump will not be dissuaded by this debate. It's not even entertaining to watch this moron because other morons might actually elect him.
Anonymous wrote:The dumbs who vote for Trump will not be dissuaded by this debate. It's not even entertaining to watch this moron because other morons might actually elect him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went into this debate undecided and at this point I'm leaning towards trump. I think he has a point about Clinton has had X number of years to accomplish these things and she hasn't.
when could she have accomplished these things?
she was a US Senator, so one of 100 and advocated for many of these things, but of course she wasn't running the show, and as Secy of State, her portfolio didn't include job creation, etc...
which things should she have accomplished and when?
and what makes you think he has any clue?
I don't know, you guys all promote her years of service as proof of her qualifications.
And what has Trump accomplished?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is flailing; Clinton looks like she's done this before.
She has. Thirty-something times.
She is droning now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is flailing; Clinton looks like she's done this before.
She has. Thirty-something times.
She is droning now.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I went into this debate undecided and at this point I'm leaning towards trump. I think he has a point about Clinton has had X number of years to accomplish these things and she hasn't.
+1
You two must not know how the government works.
Trump thinks being POTUS means you can do whatever you want. He has no clue that the POTUS has to work with Congress.
So? You think Clinton will be able to work with congress? LOL You know the republicans are planning to not let any of her nominates to the floor. This means she will not get anyone on the court.