Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yes, they look sleazy on men and women. Think of what you will look like withered up with that silly tattoo on your thigh in the nursing home.
As if I'd care by then....
Anonymous wrote:I'm a professional woman w/ a tattoo of a cartoon character on my ankle. I got it when I was 29 - very intentionally, totally sober, and something i had always wanted to do.
I'm 50 now and I still love it. I will get the color re-inked in a few years.
Anonymous wrote:yes, they look sleazy on men and women. Think of what you will look like withered up with that silly tattoo on your thigh in the nursing home.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a professional woman w/ a tattoo of a cartoon character on my ankle. I got it when I was 29 - very intentionally, totally sober, and something i had always wanted to do.
I'm 50 now and I still love it. I will get the color re-inked in a few years.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Zero. When I was young I thought they were boarder line trashy, hard to pull off in a classy dress with tattoos and definitely not pretty on aging stretched out skin.
Trust me, most people with tattoos--self included--are not getting them because of how "pretty" they look or will look on "aging stretched out skin." The obsession with beauty and signals of SES can be left to the many unhappy PPs commenting here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, I can't believe all the tattoo haters. I mostly find them attractive on both men and women but of course it depends on how they're done and how they fit with the overall look of the person that has them.
Why do you call people who [strikethrough]doesn't[/strikethrough] don't like tattoo haters? I don't hate them, it's just a matter of taste, you like one thing, I like something else. Just because I have a different taste and treat my body differently, doesn't make me a hater.