Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the numbers are not on par with magnets/privates in NY, MA ect
Not true. TJ has the best top college acceptances along with few elite BS nad public magnets.
Np, the TJ numbers are not particularly impressive given the large size of the class.
Based on the last 5 years, TJ has the most or one of the most acceptances to MIT (10- 17), Princeton (9 - 16), Stanford (10-14), Cornell (12-29), Michigan (14-28), Duke (9- 16), Berkeley (16 - 24), Yale (7 - 11) etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the numbers are not on par with magnets/privates in NY, MA ect
Not true. TJ has the best top college acceptances along with few elite BS nad public magnets.
Np, the TJ numbers are not particularly impressive given the large size of the class.
Based on the last 5 years, TJ has the most or one of the most acceptances to MIT (10- 17), Princeton (9 - 16), Stanford (10-14), Cornell (12-29), Michigan (14-28), Duke (9- 16), Berkeley (16 - 24), Yale (7 - 11) etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the numbers are not on par with magnets/privates in NY, MA ect
Not true. TJ has the best top college acceptances along with few elite BS nad public magnets.
Np, the TJ numbers are not particularly impressive given the large size of the class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the numbers are not on par with magnets/privates in NY, MA ect
Not true. TJ has the best top college acceptances along with few elite BS nad public magnets.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And the numbers are not on par with magnets/privates in NY, MA ect
Not true. TJ has the best top college acceptances along with few elite BS nad public magnets.
Anonymous wrote:And the numbers are not on par with magnets/privates in NY, MA ect
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP If your statement was true TJ would have higher acceptance numbers at elite schools. The elite school numbers for TJ are lower than other elite magnets and privates.
TJ Class of 2016 has students going to Harvard (6), MIT (13), Williams (1), Caltech (3), Harvey Mudd (1), Stanford (7), Berkeley (12), Chicago (13), Michigan (11), Brown (3), USAF (1), USCG (1), Carnegie Mellon (23), Penn (7), Yale (7), Dartmouth (4), Georgia Tech (6), Duke (8), Columbia (9), Cornell (8), Princeton (6), Olin (2), Wellesley (1), Swarthmore (3), Georgetown (5), Vanderbilt (3), Washington U. (2), Purdue (8), Rose-Hulman (2), Rennslauer (6), Rochester Tech (4). That is about 40% of the class of something like 457.
Another 1/3 go to UVA (81), W&M (32), or VA Tech (35).
Others go to places like NYU, UCLA, IU, Notre Dame, Colby, Bowdoin, VCU (6), JMU (3), George Mason (11), U of Colorado, Reed, Oregon State, Miami, USC, schools abroad, Richmond, Case Western, Penn State, GW, Syracuse, Rutgers.
What elite schools are missing?
Anonymous wrote:PP If your statement was true TJ would have higher acceptance numbers at elite schools. The elite school numbers for TJ are lower than other elite magnets and privates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:TJ is a special format of hell for the bottom half of the class
Explain please. Not enough info.
It's a lot of work but colleges only admit a certain number of students per school, no matter how good the school, so if you end up in the bottom half of TJ you are worse off than shining at your average high school or going to a private where not everyone is a stem superstar.
You're not thinking picture. A TJ kid in the middle of his h.s. class will easily be in the top 10% of his class at V-Tech.
That's a truly stupid statement. I am guessing you didn't go to college or (at least) you didn't go to college in the US. Any advantage a TJ kid has is "gone" by the end of first semester. If you don't work, you can't keep up in college. It doesn't matter which HS you attended.
Not my experience. Top private HS was far more challenging and required more work than college or first year of grad school.
I also know a number of kids from well-regarded publics who really struggled at elite universities--they were simply not as prepared as their private school educated peers. They either never caught up or took years to do so.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:TJ is a special format of hell for the bottom half of the class
Explain please. Not enough info.
It's a lot of work but colleges only admit a certain number of students per school, no matter how good the school, so if you end up in the bottom half of TJ you are worse off than shining at your average high school or going to a private where not everyone is a stem superstar.
You're not thinking picture. A TJ kid in the middle of his h.s. class will easily be in the top 10% of his class at V-Tech.
That's a truly stupid statement. I am guessing you didn't go to college or (at least) you didn't go to college in the US. Any advantage a TJ kid has is "gone" by the end of first semester. If you don't work, you can't keep up in college. It doesn't matter which HS you attended.
Anonymous wrote:Defenitly top boarding school. TJ is too much stress, too long commute. I know several kids from TJ personally, and I would not want their life for my kid. They have no time for anything else in life other than school. Maximum one club in school. No time for sports, no time for travel, just study, study and study.