Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How soon until they know an official cause?
Maryland is a no fault state, so we might never know. The police aren't going to the press with the forensics now or later. BTW, they already have everything - witness statements, engine recorder info, spoke with survivors.
No forensics? Wow, that seems pretty incredible given that 3 people died in this crash. I would assume that accident reconstruction would be standard procedure in a tragedy like this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't stop thinking about this tragedy, perhaps because I know some of the players, or perhaps because I'm a parent. One very odd question...when someone is taken to the hospital unconscious, how are loved ones found? In the example of this poor child that lived, how do they track down her extended family to come care for her? So heartbreaking.
Usually in high profile cases like this the extended family reaches out to the hospital/police. Hospitals and police will also use phone records to track down someone and find out who next of kin is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How soon until they know an official cause?
Maryland is a no fault state, so we might never know. The police aren't going to the press with the forensics now or later. BTW, they already have everything - witness statements, engine recorder info, spoke with survivors.
Anonymous wrote:I don't get how all three died from a hit and ending up in a ditch. I'm assuming the other car only hit one side. They didn't crash after, only landed in a ditch. So the airbags killed them?
Anonymous wrote:I can't stop thinking about this tragedy, perhaps because I know some of the players, or perhaps because I'm a parent. One very odd question...when someone is taken to the hospital unconscious, how are loved ones found? In the example of this poor child that lived, how do they track down her extended family to come care for her? So heartbreaking.
Anonymous wrote:How soon until they know an official cause?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry if this has been asked, but why not close off the turn? There are protected turns at Wilson and Whittier.
Why not put a traffic signal there?
Because it is a major commuting thoroughfare. And traffic lights can increase accidents.
And every traffic light costs ca. 300K.
Circa is only used to approximate time and dates.
Sorry but that's like the third time I've seen it on here lately, it isn't correct!
Anonymous wrote:How soon until they know an official cause?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I drive this road all the time; a change in speed limit truly isn't required - there are no sidewalks along River, few residences that abut the road and huge medians throughout. The few schools on River have entrances well into their property and no child is at risk right at the roadside. What is needed is a LIGHT at this particular spot.
I don't think a light is needed. I don't think there is enough traffic crossing at most times during the day and I think it is too close to the light at Wilson. I think they should just close the median. I don't think anyone needs to go across River Road there.
Nobody NEEDS to use River Road at all, except for the people/facilities with driveways off it. Plenty of people WANT to use River Road, though. And plenty of people evidently want to use that intersection.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sorry if this has been asked, but why not close off the turn? There are protected turns at Wilson and Whittier.
Why not put a traffic signal there?
Because it is a major commuting thoroughfare. And traffic lights can increase accidents.
And every traffic light costs ca. 300K.