Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
He was probably polite. Or interacted with more experienced police. The cop in question had a chip on his shoulder, but if she just stopped the attitude...
Attitude is not against the law. And it is a part of a police officer's job to handle attitude appropriately.
Your right and he didn't Sonshe should have. Both are to blame. She was not a child, stop acting like she bears no responsiblity.
Actually I think it would remarkably childish for the police officer to say that Sandra Bland made him do it. Is it her fault that the police officer dragged her out of the car? No, it is not.
Lets say she put the cigarette out.
He was signing the citation while they spoke.
Lets say she said "thank you"when he handed her the citation.
What do YOU think would have happened next?
Let's say she was wearing a maxi dress instead of a mini dress.
Let's say that she had a button-up collar shirt on instead of a low cut V-neck form fitted sweater.
Let's say she was walking home from night school at 2100 hours instead of day school at 1500 hours.
Do you really think it's her fault, and the man made him rape her?
No, I dont think its her fault. But Sandra had an opportunity to be the better person. And like it or not, she did break the law. She also killed herself, until it is scientifically proven otherwise. Did the cop handle it well, heck no. But being an egomanical cop doesn't mean her killed her either.
Not sure how you stretched to an innocent female getting raped...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
He was probably polite. Or interacted with more experienced police. The cop in question had a chip on his shoulder, but if she just stopped the attitude...
Attitude is not against the law. And it is a part of a police officer's job to handle attitude appropriately.
Your right and he didn't Sonshe should have. Both are to blame. She was not a child, stop acting like she bears no responsiblity.
Actually I think it would remarkably childish for the police officer to say that Sandra Bland made him do it. Is it her fault that the police officer dragged her out of the car? No, it is not.
Lets say she put the cigarette out.
He was signing the citation while they spoke.
Lets say she said "thank you"when he handed her the citation.
What do YOU think would have happened next?
Let's say she was wearing a maxi dress instead of a mini dress.
Let's say that she had a button-up collar shirt on instead of a low cut V-neck form fitted sweater.
Let's say she was walking home from night school at 2100 hours instead of day school at 1500 hours.
Do you really think it's her fault, and the man made him rape her?
I don't think the cop was out to rape someone
Anonymous wrote:How on earth did she get so much marijuana into her system IN jail?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3172493/Sandra-Bland-smoked-swallowed-MARIJUANA-inside-jail-died.html
Very suspicious to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
He was probably polite. Or interacted with more experienced police. The cop in question had a chip on his shoulder, but if she just stopped the attitude...
Attitude is not against the law. And it is a part of a police officer's job to handle attitude appropriately.
Your right and he didn't Sonshe should have. Both are to blame. She was not a child, stop acting like she bears no responsiblity.
Actually I think it would remarkably childish for the police officer to say that Sandra Bland made him do it. Is it her fault that the police officer dragged her out of the car? No, it is not.
Lets say she put the cigarette out.
He was signing the citation while they spoke.
Lets say she said "thank you"when he handed her the citation.
What do YOU think would have happened next?
Let's say she was wearing a maxi dress instead of a mini dress.
Let's say that she had a button-up collar shirt on instead of a low cut V-neck form fitted sweater.
Let's say she was walking home from night school at 2100 hours instead of day school at 1500 hours.
Do you really think it's her fault, and the man made him rape her?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Lets say she put the cigarette out.
He was signing the citation while they spoke.
Lets say she said "thank you"when he handed her the citation.
What do YOU think would have happened next?
So you basically are saying that Sandra Bland made him do it. It was her fault that the police officer acted the way he did.
Alternatively, the police officer has an obligation to act ethically, legally, and responsibly regardless of the behavior of the person the police officer is interacting with.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
He was probably polite. Or interacted with more experienced police. The cop in question had a chip on his shoulder, but if she just stopped the attitude...
Attitude is not against the law. And it is a part of a police officer's job to handle attitude appropriately.
Your right and he didn't Sonshe should have. Both are to blame. She was not a child, stop acting like she bears no responsiblity.
Actually I think it would remarkably childish for the police officer to say that Sandra Bland made him do it. Is it her fault that the police officer dragged her out of the car? No, it is not.
Lets say she put the cigarette out.
He was signing the citation while they spoke.
Lets say she said "thank you"when he handed her the citation.
What do YOU think would have happened next?
Let's say she was wearing a maxi dress instead of a mini dress.
Let's say that she had a button-up collar shirt on instead of a low cut V-neck form fitted sweater.
Let's say she was walking home from night school at 2100 hours instead of day school at 1500 hours.
Do you really think it's her fault, and the man made him rape her?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
He was probably polite. Or interacted with more experienced police. The cop in question had a chip on his shoulder, but if she just stopped the attitude...
Attitude is not against the law. And it is a part of a police officer's job to handle attitude appropriately.
Your right and he didn't Sonshe should have. Both are to blame. She was not a child, stop acting like she bears no responsiblity.
Actually I think it would remarkably childish for the police officer to say that Sandra Bland made him do it. Is it her fault that the police officer dragged her out of the car? No, it is not.
Lets say she put the cigarette out.
He was signing the citation while they spoke.
Lets say she said "thank you"when he handed her the citation.
What do YOU think would have happened next?
Anonymous wrote:
Lets say she put the cigarette out.
He was signing the citation while they spoke.
Lets say she said "thank you"when he handed her the citation.
What do YOU think would have happened next?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
He was probably polite. Or interacted with more experienced police. The cop in question had a chip on his shoulder, but if she just stopped the attitude...
Attitude is not against the law. And it is a part of a police officer's job to handle attitude appropriately.
Your right and he didn't Sonshe should have. Both are to blame. She was not a child, stop acting like she bears no responsiblity.
Actually I think it would remarkably childish for the police officer to say that Sandra Bland made him do it. Is it her fault that the police officer dragged her out of the car? No, it is not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
He was probably polite. Or interacted with more experienced police. The cop in question had a chip on his shoulder, but if she just stopped the attitude...
Attitude is not against the law. And it is a part of a police officer's job to handle attitude appropriately.
Your right and he didn't Sonshe should have. Both are to blame. She was not a child, stop acting like she bears no responsiblity.
Anonymous wrote:OMG!
I have been posting on this thread and totally forgot that I started it!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
He was probably polite. Or interacted with more experienced police. The cop in question had a chip on his shoulder, but if she just stopped the attitude...
Attitude is not against the law. And it is a part of a police officer's job to handle attitude appropriately.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know what drives me nuts is that not 6 months ago, you had a bunch of white "patriots" on Cliven Bundy's ranch aiming their weapons at police and federal agents and NOTHING happened to them.
But a Black lady refuses to put out a cigarette and asks if she's being arrested, and she deserves to be beaten and murdered.
Or the recent case, as in within the past week, where a white guy with a Confederate flag painted on the hood of his car reached for a gun twice during a confrontation with the cops and was not injured in any way.
He was probably polite. Or interacted with more experienced police. The cop in question had a chip on his shoulder, but if she just stopped the attitude...
YOU CALL REACHING FOR A GUN POLITE????