Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You hardly even have to make time. At lease once a week we multitask and lock the bathroom door in the morning and shower together and have sex. We've been together 15yrs and at a minimum do it twice a week and it takes no more than 30min out of my week (and im being generous)...hardly a hardship.
I spend more time each week on this stupid fucking website.
Lame lame excuses. These people in these sexless marriages, I hoe, are getting laid on the side. What a horrible existance to have a passionless marriage.
How many kids do you have? Were you doing it twice/week when they were infants? Did you have PPD? Have you been in perimenopause yet? Does your DH work 70 hours/week so you do all the household stuff, on top of your own job? Do your kids have any chronic health problems? Do you?
If not, then stop being so arrogant and assuming that because your life allows for morning shower sex, everyone's should.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Woah...OP really steuck a nerve. 13 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs.
Actually, no. We have a great sex life, now. But for 2-3 years when the kids were little? Nope. Good when it happened, but not nearly frequent enough -- and it WAS me saying no. But thank GOD my DH is nothing like these losers spouting their childish, selfish, pathetic misogynistic crap. I could never respect someone like that. He saw it as our problem, and worked to try to help me get back to where we needed to be. Just like I worked with him when he had a hard time in another area of life. How do you not take care of the mother of your children? What kind of man behaves like that? She's going through something, so you bail. Nice vows. That's not a man. THat's not even an adult.
His kids are in ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. They are not little.
How do you not take care of your spouse at all? Does his emotional needs mean NOTHING.
I stand by my statement, but modify it to
Woah...OP really struck a nerve. 18 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs
You already made that dead between the legs jibe and no one cared then and no one cares now.
I certainly rattled you enough to respond.
Different PP here, but do you know the difference between "disagreeing" and "rattled"? Because it sounds like if anyone responds and disagrees with you, you think they're "rattled". Um, maybe we need to work on some basic vocab.
What are you blathering on about again?
Good comeback. Really. You're a genius.
Ha! my 12yr old said that just today! it's a classic!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Woah...OP really steuck a nerve. 13 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs.
Actually, no. We have a great sex life, now. But for 2-3 years when the kids were little? Nope. Good when it happened, but not nearly frequent enough -- and it WAS me saying no. But thank GOD my DH is nothing like these losers spouting their childish, selfish, pathetic misogynistic crap. I could never respect someone like that. He saw it as our problem, and worked to try to help me get back to where we needed to be. Just like I worked with him when he had a hard time in another area of life. How do you not take care of the mother of your children? What kind of man behaves like that? She's going through something, so you bail. Nice vows. That's not a man. THat's not even an adult.
His kids are in ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. They are not little.
How do you not take care of your spouse at all? Does his emotional needs mean NOTHING.
I stand by my statement, but modify it to
Woah...OP really struck a nerve. 18 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs
Then you'd still be wrong. And why isn't he taking care of his spouse's emotional needs? Because clearly he isn't.
How is this clear? Are you clairvoyant?
Well, let's see: 1) she used to be sexually interested and now she's pretty much asexual. That indicates that she has some physical or emotional needs that aren't being met, or her sexual function would be healthier. 2) His response to the situation is to call her fat and plan to leave her.
I can't know for sure, but I feel like it's a pretty safe bet.
Oh, so you're jist making a bunch of shit up. I see, I thought you had a crystal ball.
Maybe he should do Some chores. I hear That makes women really horney.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Woah...OP really steuck a nerve. 13 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs.
Actually, no. We have a great sex life, now. But for 2-3 years when the kids were little? Nope. Good when it happened, but not nearly frequent enough -- and it WAS me saying no. But thank GOD my DH is nothing like these losers spouting their childish, selfish, pathetic misogynistic crap. I could never respect someone like that. He saw it as our problem, and worked to try to help me get back to where we needed to be. Just like I worked with him when he had a hard time in another area of life. How do you not take care of the mother of your children? What kind of man behaves like that? She's going through something, so you bail. Nice vows. That's not a man. THat's not even an adult.
His kids are in ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. They are not little.
How do you not take care of your spouse at all? Does his emotional needs mean NOTHING.
I stand by my statement, but modify it to
Woah...OP really struck a nerve. 18 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs
You already made that dead between the legs jibe and no one cared then and no one cares now.
I certainly rattled you enough to respond.
Different PP here, but do you know the difference between "disagreeing" and "rattled"? Because it sounds like if anyone responds and disagrees with you, you think they're "rattled". Um, maybe we need to work on some basic vocab.
What are you blathering on about again?
Good comeback. Really. You're a genius.
Anonymous wrote:You hardly even have to make time. At lease once a week we multitask and lock the bathroom door in the morning and shower together and have sex. We've been together 15yrs and at a minimum do it twice a week and it takes no more than 30min out of my week (and im being generous)...hardly a hardship.
I spend more time each week on this stupid fucking website.
Lame lame excuses. These people in these sexless marriages, I hoe, are getting laid on the side. What a horrible existance to have a passionless marriage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Woah...OP really steuck a nerve. 13 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs.
Actually, no. We have a great sex life, now. But for 2-3 years when the kids were little? Nope. Good when it happened, but not nearly frequent enough -- and it WAS me saying no. But thank GOD my DH is nothing like these losers spouting their childish, selfish, pathetic misogynistic crap. I could never respect someone like that. He saw it as our problem, and worked to try to help me get back to where we needed to be. Just like I worked with him when he had a hard time in another area of life. How do you not take care of the mother of your children? What kind of man behaves like that? She's going through something, so you bail. Nice vows. That's not a man. THat's not even an adult.
His kids are in ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. They are not little.
How do you not take care of your spouse at all? Does his emotional needs mean NOTHING.
I stand by my statement, but modify it to
Woah...OP really struck a nerve. 18 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs
Then you'd still be wrong. And why isn't he taking care of his spouse's emotional needs? Because clearly he isn't.
How is this clear? Are you clairvoyant?
Well, let's see: 1) she used to be sexually interested and now she's pretty much asexual. That indicates that she has some physical or emotional needs that aren't being met, or her sexual function would be healthier. 2) His response to the situation is to call her fat and plan to leave her.
I can't know for sure, but I feel like it's a pretty safe bet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please explain why your needs should come before those of small children.
Who said anything about my needs come before those of small children ?
Because that suggests that some childcare need is going unmet, but that is not the case at all.
Every single reasonable need of the kids is being met.
And there is plenty of time left over for her needs and mine.
Are you meeting your wife's needs? Do you even know what they really are? Are you meeting your kids's needs? Or do you expect your wife to manage all of those needs (ie, do you know what need to be fed at what age? What size clothes and shoes they wear? When they need their nails trimmed? Do y have the schools' phone numbers on your cell phone? Do you know when their next check up at the peds office is due? Do you schedule those appointments, or do you expect your wife to know those?)
I do.all that and still find the 10 Minutes it takes to have sex with my husband and affection? Not very hard. You have to be a pretty cold and dead fish to not manage to muster some affection.
You all act like having sex is akin to ruuning a marathon. The above is a load of excuses. Your passion is dead. Your vagina is dead.
Exactly. If you wanted sex you'd make time. And sadly, for DHs everywhere, YOU DON'T WANT TO HAVE SEX.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Woah...OP really steuck a nerve. 13 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs.
Actually, no. We have a great sex life, now. But for 2-3 years when the kids were little? Nope. Good when it happened, but not nearly frequent enough -- and it WAS me saying no. But thank GOD my DH is nothing like these losers spouting their childish, selfish, pathetic misogynistic crap. I could never respect someone like that. He saw it as our problem, and worked to try to help me get back to where we needed to be. Just like I worked with him when he had a hard time in another area of life. How do you not take care of the mother of your children? What kind of man behaves like that? She's going through something, so you bail. Nice vows. That's not a man. THat's not even an adult.
His kids are in ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. They are not little.
How do you not take care of your spouse at all? Does his emotional needs mean NOTHING.
I stand by my statement, but modify it to
Woah...OP really struck a nerve. 18 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs
You already made that dead between the legs jibe and no one cared then and no one cares now.
I certainly rattled you enough to respond.
Different PP here, but do you know the difference between "disagreeing" and "rattled"? Because it sounds like if anyone responds and disagrees with you, you think they're "rattled". Um, maybe we need to work on some basic vocab.
What are you blathering on about again?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please explain why your needs should come before those of small children.
Who said anything about my needs come before those of small children ?
Because that suggests that some childcare need is going unmet, but that is not the case at all.
Every single reasonable need of the kids is being met.
And there is plenty of time left over for her needs and mine.
Are you meeting your wife's needs? Do you even know what they really are? Are you meeting your kids's needs? Or do you expect your wife to manage all of those needs (ie, do you know what need to be fed at what age? What size clothes and shoes they wear? When they need their nails trimmed? Do y have the schools' phone numbers on your cell phone? Do you know when their next check up at the peds office is due? Do you schedule those appointments, or do you expect your wife to know those?)
I do.all that and still find the 10 Minutes it takes to have sex with my husband and affection? Not very hard. You have to be a pretty cold and dead fish to not manage to muster some affection.
You all act like having sex is akin to ruuning a marathon. The above is a load of excuses. Your passion is dead. Your vagina is dead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Woah...OP really steuck a nerve. 13 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs.
Actually, no. We have a great sex life, now. But for 2-3 years when the kids were little? Nope. Good when it happened, but not nearly frequent enough -- and it WAS me saying no. But thank GOD my DH is nothing like these losers spouting their childish, selfish, pathetic misogynistic crap. I could never respect someone like that. He saw it as our problem, and worked to try to help me get back to where we needed to be. Just like I worked with him when he had a hard time in another area of life. How do you not take care of the mother of your children? What kind of man behaves like that? She's going through something, so you bail. Nice vows. That's not a man. THat's not even an adult.
His kids are in ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. They are not little.
How do you not take care of your spouse at all? Does his emotional needs mean NOTHING.
I stand by my statement, but modify it to
Woah...OP really struck a nerve. 18 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs
You already made that dead between the legs jibe and no one cared then and no one cares now.
I certainly rattled you enough to respond.
Different PP here, but do you know the difference between "disagreeing" and "rattled"? Because it sounds like if anyone responds and disagrees with you, you think they're "rattled". Um, maybe we need to work on some basic vocab.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Woah...OP really steuck a nerve. 13 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs.
Actually, no. We have a great sex life, now. But for 2-3 years when the kids were little? Nope. Good when it happened, but not nearly frequent enough -- and it WAS me saying no. But thank GOD my DH is nothing like these losers spouting their childish, selfish, pathetic misogynistic crap. I could never respect someone like that. He saw it as our problem, and worked to try to help me get back to where we needed to be. Just like I worked with him when he had a hard time in another area of life. How do you not take care of the mother of your children? What kind of man behaves like that? She's going through something, so you bail. Nice vows. That's not a man. THat's not even an adult.
His kids are in ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. They are not little.
How do you not take care of your spouse at all? Does his emotional needs mean NOTHING.
I stand by my statement, but modify it to
Woah...OP really struck a nerve. 18 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs
Then you'd still be wrong. And why isn't he taking care of his spouse's emotional needs? Because clearly he isn't.
How is this clear? Are you clairvoyant?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Woah...OP really steuck a nerve. 13 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs.
Actually, no. We have a great sex life, now. But for 2-3 years when the kids were little? Nope. Good when it happened, but not nearly frequent enough -- and it WAS me saying no. But thank GOD my DH is nothing like these losers spouting their childish, selfish, pathetic misogynistic crap. I could never respect someone like that. He saw it as our problem, and worked to try to help me get back to where we needed to be. Just like I worked with him when he had a hard time in another area of life. How do you not take care of the mother of your children? What kind of man behaves like that? She's going through something, so you bail. Nice vows. That's not a man. THat's not even an adult.
His kids are in ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. They are not little.
How do you not take care of your spouse at all? Does his emotional needs mean NOTHING.
I stand by my statement, but modify it to
Woah...OP really struck a nerve. 18 pages.
Me thinks many of you who are so upset are the spouse who is dead between the legs
You already made that dead between the legs jibe and no one cared then and no one cares now.
I certainly rattled you enough to respond.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please explain why your needs should come before those of small children.
Who said anything about my needs come before those of small children ?
Because that suggests that some childcare need is going unmet, but that is not the case at all.
Every single reasonable need of the kids is being met.
And there is plenty of time left over for her needs and mine.
Are you meeting your wife's needs? Do you even know what they really are? Are you meeting your kids's needs? Or do you expect your wife to manage all of those needs (ie, do you know what need to be fed at what age? What size clothes and shoes they wear? When they need their nails trimmed? Do y have the schools' phone numbers on your cell phone? Do you know when their next check up at the peds office is due? Do you schedule those appointments, or do you expect your wife to know those?)
I do.all that and still find the 10 Minutes it takes to have sex with my husband and affection? Not very hard. You have to be a pretty cold and dead fish to not manage to muster some affection.
You all act like having sex is akin to ruuning a marathon. The above is a load of excuses. Your passion is dead. Your vagina is dead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Please explain why your needs should come before those of small children.
Who said anything about my needs come before those of small children ?
Because that suggests that some childcare need is going unmet, but that is not the case at all.
Every single reasonable need of the kids is being met.
And there is plenty of time left over for her needs and mine.
Are you meeting your wife's needs? Do you even know what they really are? Are you meeting your kids's needs? Or do you expect your wife to manage all of those needs (ie, do you know what need to be fed at what age? What size clothes and shoes they wear? When they need their nails trimmed? Do y have the schools' phone numbers on your cell phone? Do you know when their next check up at the peds office is due? Do you schedule those appointments, or do you expect your wife to know those?)