Anonymous wrote:I can't stand her screaming voice. She's incredebly rude and takes up too much space...it's like she's running her own show....i barely watch anymore...too bad for Hoda....

Anonymous wrote:Yes - she wouldn't have been hired for the job if she were any other person. BUT she wouldn't have kept the job for 11 years if she was really that bad at being a co-host.

Nepotism got her in the door. Nepotism is not making her survive in that job for 11 years.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes - she wouldn't have been hired for the job if she were any other person. BUT she wouldn't have kept the job for 11 years if she was really that bad at being a co-host.

Nepotism got her in the door. Nepotism is not making her survive in that job for 11 years.

You don’t understand what nepotism is. It’s literally getting a job you don’t deserve and wouldn’t have otherwise gotten on your own merits.

I think she deserves it, and I don't enjoy those shows at all. My criteria is: do I cringe and want to change channels if they are on? The answer is no for her. She is fine at what she does. Many are not. I could not stand Matt Lauer for instance (well before the scandal), regardless of whether he got his job through nepotism.

I couldn’t stand Katie Couric with that big fake-y smile.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes - she wouldn't have been hired for the job if she were any other person. BUT she wouldn't have kept the job for 11 years if she was really that bad at being a co-host.

Nepotism got her in the door. Nepotism is not making her survive in that job for 11 years.

You don’t understand what nepotism is. It’s literally getting a job you don’t deserve and wouldn’t have otherwise gotten on your own merits.

I think she deserves it, and I don't enjoy those shows at all. My criteria is: do I cringe and want to change channels if they are on? The answer is no for her. She is fine at what she does. Many are not. I could not stand Matt Lauer for instance (well before the scandal), regardless of whether he got his job through nepotism.

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy watching the olympics on the Today Show for this main reason. Glad Ms. Bush is not on this assignment. She is not that good in her job.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes - she wouldn't have been hired for the job if she were any other person. BUT she wouldn't have kept the job for 11 years if she was really that bad at being a co-host.

Nepotism got her in the door. Nepotism is not making her survive in that job for 11 years.

You don’t understand what nepotism is. It’s literally getting a job you don’t deserve and wouldn’t have otherwise gotten on your own merits.

Anonymous wrote:Yes - she wouldn't have been hired for the job if she were any other person. BUT she wouldn't have kept the job for 11 years if she was really that bad at being a co-host.

Nepotism got her in the door. Nepotism is not making her survive in that job for 11 years.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy watching the olympics on the Today Show for this main reason. Glad Ms. Bush is not on this assignment. She is not that good in her job.

not good at her job? yeah, that must be why she still has it vs after 11 years of not being good at her job.

Have you watched the show? She is NOT good. Yes, slightly less horrible then when she first started 11 years ago, but if she was anyone else she would have been gone (not to mention never hired in the first place).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy watching the olympics on the Today Show for this main reason. Glad Ms. Bush is not on this assignment. She is not that good in her job.

not good at her job? yeah, that must be why she still has it vs after 11 years of not being good at her job.

Anonymous wrote:Enjoy watching the olympics on the Today Show for this main reason. Glad Ms. Bush is not on this assignment. She is not that good in her job.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She bugs ... on so many levels. And she has a speech impediment that is VERY distracting.

Must be nice to be able to live off the fact that you're the daughter of a president...and NOTHING else.

I think Chelsea Clinton digs it too.

Wikipedia on Chelsea-
"She pursued her undergraduate education at Stanford University and also earned master's degrees from University College, Oxford, and Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. She is currently pursuing a doctoral degree at University of Oxford."

"In 2011, Clinton began pursuing a doctoral degree in international relations from Oxford University, doing her work from New York where she is employed.[33][34]
[edit]Columbia University and New York University
In the spring of 2010, Clinton completed a Master of Public Health degree at Columbia Mailman School of Public Health.[35][36]
Starting in 2010, she has served as Assistant Vice Provost for the Global Network University of New York University, working on international recruitment strategies.[34] She is the co-founder of the Of Many Institute for Multifaith Leadership at NYU and serves as its co-chair.[37]
Clinton received an award from the Temple of Understanding for her "work in advancing a new model of integrating interfaith and cross-cultural education into campus life," together with Imam Khalid Latif and Rabbi Yehuda Sarna.[38]
In 2012, Clinton started teaching graduate classes at Columbia's Mailman School of Public Health.[39]"

Chelsea and Jenna are NOT the same.

????

I do not know what you mean. Everything you put up about Chelsea indicates that she is a fake and has done nothing with her life. Most of that stuff is word salad and not real. She has no PhD. She has had no real job.

This thread is 11 years old. It said at that time she was starting a doctoral degree. If she didn’t finish, so be it.

The information came from Wikipedia - if it reads as word salad, that’s why.

She does have multiple degrees. Jenna does not. That was the point.

She has multiple BS degrees. Even if they were real who cares? A degree does not make you better than another.

Doing the work for all those degrees is at least worthy of some respect. I was done after one Master's. Whether you think the topics are B or not isn't re;evant - they at least involved reading, tests and papers. That's a time commitment.

Oh yes, it's so so challenging to do b.s. busy work as a career student trust funder to accumulate bogus degree mill "advanced" degrees. Try actually earning a living, then get back to me.

Oxford is a degree mill?