Anonymous
Post 03/01/2012 15:07     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
So now 05:50 is arguing with us about what comes out of her pores?
Anonymous
Post 03/01/2012 13:09     Subject: Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I dig Snakey too. 05:50, you are a tough room. Do you limit your reading only to book reviewed favorably by michiko kakutani? Or maybe only to books adjudged classics by Mortimer Adler? Lighten up. Everybody doesn't hit pay dirt every time. Meanwhile, if I may, I find your criticism dry and vague. If you want to be the Michiko of DCUM thread criticism, you need to step up your game.


I normally hate this but... +1. The humor is not exactly oozing out of your pores 5:50.


How do you know?


I know.


no, you don't.
Anonymous
Post 03/01/2012 13:08     Subject: Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I dig Snakey too. 05:50, you are a tough room. Do you limit your reading only to book reviewed favorably by michiko kakutani? Or maybe only to books adjudged classics by Mortimer Adler? Lighten up. Everybody doesn't hit pay dirt every time. Meanwhile, if I may, I find your criticism dry and vague. If you want to be the Michiko of DCUM thread criticism, you need to step up your game.


I normally hate this but... +1. The humor is not exactly oozing out of your pores 5:50.


How do you know?


I know.
Anonymous
Post 03/01/2012 12:53     Subject: Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
Over 8000 page views on this thread. Pretty soon it will eclipse the thread about gaps on the resumes of SAHMs. . .
Anonymous
Post 03/01/2012 12:37     Subject: Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I dig Snakey too. 05:50, you are a tough room. Do you limit your reading only to book reviewed favorably by michiko kakutani? Or maybe only to books adjudged classics by Mortimer Adler? Lighten up. Everybody doesn't hit pay dirt every time. Meanwhile, if I may, I find your criticism dry and vague. If you want to be the Michiko of DCUM thread criticism, you need to step up your game.


I normally hate this but... +1. The humor is not exactly oozing out of your pores 5:50.


How do you know?
Anonymous
Post 03/01/2012 12:29     Subject: Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
Anonymous wrote:I dig Snakey too. 05:50, you are a tough room. Do you limit your reading only to book reviewed favorably by michiko kakutani? Or maybe only to books adjudged classics by Mortimer Adler? Lighten up. Everybody doesn't hit pay dirt every time. Meanwhile, if I may, I find your criticism dry and vague. If you want to be the Michiko of DCUM thread criticism, you need to step up your game.


I normally hate this but... +1. The humor is not exactly oozing out of your pores 5:50.
Anonymous
Post 03/01/2012 11:49     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
Jelson?
Anonymous
Post 03/01/2012 11:28     Subject: Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
I dig Snakey too. 05:50, you are a tough room. Do you limit your reading only to book reviewed favorably by michiko kakutani? Or maybe only to books adjudged classics by Mortimer Adler? Lighten up. Everybody doesn't hit pay dirt every time. Meanwhile, if I may, I find your criticism dry and vague. If you want to be the Michiko of DCUM thread criticism, you need to step up your game.
Anonymous
Post 03/01/2012 09:44     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
I don't know about the rest of you, but I love the Snakey character. Greatest addition to the DCUM family since Crazy Morning Drop-off Ranter.
Anonymous
Post 03/01/2012 05:50     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
ok, 21:58, 22:41, 22:45, 23:29; You are not remotely clever or funny. Again, 1 HI-larious post followed by so many lame ones.
boring.
Anonymous
Post 02/29/2012 23:29     Subject: Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
You see there Snake, this mongoose has a sharp sense of smell. But s/he's a fan of yours, so no need to leave.
Anonymous
Post 02/29/2012 22:54     Subject: Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
OK Snake-Wack.
Anonymous
Post 02/29/2012 22:45     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This is literally the stupidest thread I have ever seen on these boards -- and it had a lot of competition.


It's the fourth ranked thread in DCUM's hottest topics--- how can it be stupid?


Umm... You're not actually suggesting that this is proof that it isn't stupid, are you?

Many threads and posts here get really over the top -- but this is ridiculous. There is the grain of REAL and USEFUL information that I occasionally glean on the rare occasions that I frequent this board. But this thread really says something about the FREQUENT POSTERS here on DCUM. Hint: it isn't something positive.



SSSS I agree with you. SSSS
Anonymous
Post 02/29/2012 22:41     Subject: Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
Snakes don't bite they strike. Also, you'll never know the length of a snake until you stretch it out.

Hey there, Janney's dad I caught you looking while I was shaking my rattler. Girl's he is a black mamba!!!!
Anonymous
Post 02/29/2012 21:58     Subject: Re:Lack Of Eye Candy At Janney
HAH!

How about banishing the sourpusses to their own forum?

Oh, right, forgot my 80's adolescent snark: "Heh, you said PROPORTION."